Ethereum (ETH) Momentum Check: Will $2.9K Hold or Break?

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2025-12-19Last updated on 2025-12-19

Abstract

Ethereum (ETH) is experiencing mixed signals amid a slight market uptick. While it gained over 3.73% in 24 hours, trading between $2,777 and $2,994, it remains under downside pressure. Currently trading around $2,959, its market cap is $356.61 billion with a 44.72% surge in daily volume to $37.15 billion. Technical indicators show bearish momentum with MACD below zero, but mild buying pressure is noted with a CMF of 0.06. Key support lies at $2,947; a break below could lead to further declines, while a bullish push might test resistance at $2,971. A breakout could drive prices toward $2,983. The Bull Bear Power indicates bullish dominance, but RSI at 52.40 suggests neutral momentum, reflecting a consolidation phase.

A brief 1.19% uptick in the market cap has triggered it to reach $2.97 trillion. This has resulted in mixed signals across the crypto assets, sending the prices up and down. The largest asset, Bitcoin (BTC), is attempting to enter the bullish zone and escape from the bear grip. Meanwhile, Ethereum (ETH), the largest altcoin, has been under prolonged downside pressure.

The asset has posted a gain of over 3.73% in the last 24 hours. Today’s low and high ranges of ETH were marked at around $2,777.12 and $2,994.55. If the bulls steadily gained strength, they could form a bullish trend line. On the attempts failing, the price movement may end up losing more momentum in the market.

At the time of writing, Ethereum traded within the $2,959 range, with the market cap at $356.61 billion. Additionally, the daily trading volume of the asset has soared by over 44.72%, reaching the $37.15 billion mark. As per Coinglass data, the market has experienced a 24-hour liquidation of $158.28 million worth of Ethereum.

Can Ethereum Flip Momentum and Break Higher?

Ethereum’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line and the signal line are below the zero line, pointing out bearish momentum. Notably, the short-term price trend is weaker than the longer-term trend. Besides, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator at 0.06 hints at mild buying pressure in the ETH market. The money is flowing into the asset, showing early accumulation, but not strong enough to confirm a solid uptrend.

With the ongoing downside correction, the Ethereum price could retrace to the support zone at $2,947. A potential bearish pressure might trigger the death cross to take place, and send the price below the $2,935 range. Conversely, if Ethereum momentum turns bullish, it might rise and find the resistance at the $2,971 level. A breakout could likely initiate a strong upside shift, and the golden cross would unfold to drive the price toward $2,983.

Moreover, the Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of ETH at 101.29 indicates strong bullish dominance in the market, reflecting upside momentum. Higher readings can signal the overextension condition. Ethereum’s daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) resting at 52.40 suggests neutral momentum. Significantly, neither the buyers nor the sellers are in clear control, but this is often seen during the consolidation phases.

Top Updated Crypto News

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Momentum Builds: Could $600 Be Hit by Day’s End?

TagsAltcoinCryptocurrencyETHETH PriceETHEREUM

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Questions

QWhat is the current trading range of Ethereum (ETH) as mentioned in the article?

AAt the time of writing, Ethereum traded within the $2,959 range.

QWhat does the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator value of 0.06 suggest about the ETH market?

AA CMF value of 0.06 hints at mild buying pressure in the ETH market, indicating that money is flowing into the asset and showing early accumulation, but it is not strong enough to confirm a solid uptrend.

QAccording to the technical indicators, what is the significance of Ethereum's MACD and signal lines being below the zero line?

AThe Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line and the signal line being below the zero line point out a bearish momentum, indicating that the short-term price trend is weaker than the longer-term trend.

QWhat are the potential price targets for Ethereum if the momentum turns bullish, according to the analysis?

AIf Ethereum's momentum turns bullish, it might rise and find resistance at the $2,971 level. A breakout could initiate a strong upside shift, potentially driving the price toward $2,983.

QWhat does the Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of 101.29 indicate for Ethereum's market?

AA Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of 101.29 indicates strong bullish dominance in the market, reflecting upside momentum. However, higher readings can also signal an overextension condition.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit13m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit13m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit29m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit29m ago

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

United Stables' U token has surpassed $1 billion in market capitalization, with Chainlink Data Feeds providing the critical pricing and collateral data infrastructure across its deployment chains. This milestone highlights that robust oracle infrastructure is essential for stablecoin credibility, as DeFi protocols require reliable data for integration. Chainlink's role is foundational, enabling automated collateral auditing and pricing verification, which helps make the U token safer for the broader market to evaluate and use. While this strengthens Chainlink's position in the stablecoin infrastructure narrative, it does not directly guarantee increased fees or value for LINK token holders. The growth of U indicates both widening competition in the stablecoin sector and the increasing dependence of scalable stablecoins on dependable external data services.

bitcoinist1h ago

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

bitcoinist1h ago

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

The BonkDAO treasury suffered an approximately $20 million drain due to a malicious governance proposal passed through the Realms platform on Solana. This incident highlights governance as a critical attack surface for DAOs, distinct from smart contract exploits. The attack leveraged the DAO's own voting mechanics to move funds, demonstrating that flawed governance design—such as weak proposal rules or voter weight calculations—can be exploited even when the underlying blockchain functions correctly. The event serves as a warning for Solana DAOs to rigorously review and strengthen their governance safeguards, including quorum thresholds, timelocks, and execution permissions. While damaging to community trust, especially for the prominent BONK meme ecosystem, the issue is not a failure of the Solana base layer but a widespread application-level risk common across blockchain ecosystems.

bitcoinist2h ago

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

bitcoinist2h ago

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

Midnight's NIGHT token plummeted roughly 30% following a $13.2 million exploit on a Wanchain cross-chain bridge. The attacker drained 515 million NIGHT tokens by exploiting a signature reuse flaw in the bridge's infrastructure, not the core Cardano or Midnight networks. This incident highlights the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, which are critical for asset transfers but introduce complex security risks. While the underlying blockchains remained secure, the token's price suffered due to liquidity disruption and lost market confidence. The response from Wanchain, including pausing the affected bridge and providing clear communication on recovery efforts, will be crucial for stabilizing the situation. The event serves as a reminder for traders to factor in bridge-related risks when evaluating tokens reliant on cross-chain liquidity.

bitcoinist2h ago

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

bitcoinist2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions