Ethereum ETFs flip to $117mln inflows – Will ETH reclaim $3K next?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-28Last updated on 2026-01-28

Abstract

Ethereum ETFs recorded $117 million in net inflows on January 26th, led by Fidelity with $137 million, while BlackRock saw outflows, indicating selective institutional interest rather than broad accumulation. Despite this, Ethereum's price action remained constrained, trading around $2,908 with key support near $2,900 and $2,850. Breaking the $3,000 resistance is crucial for a potential move toward $3,200–$3,400, though weak momentum indicators like the MACD and RSI suggest limited buying pressure. Additionally, Ethereum’s network fees dropped to multi-year lows, improving scalability but raising questions about sustained long-term growth.

Ethereum rebounded on the 26th of January, posting $117 million in net inflows into U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs. Fidelity dominated the session, recording $137 million in inflows and snapping a four-day outflow streak.

By contrast, BlackRock registered net outflows on the day. That divergence highlighted selective institutional positioning rather than broad-based accumulation.

The reversal in ETF flows followed multiple sessions of sustained outflows. That shift left traders focused on whether institutions were rebuilding exposure or executing short-term reallocations.

Even so, inflows alone did not guarantee immediate price expansion.

Ethereum network fees hit multi-year lows

Glassnode data showed Ethereum’s Total Transaction Fees fell to their lowest level since May 2017 on the 27th of January.

This sharp decline boosted scalability and security, driving the ecosystem forward. Lower fees solidified a healthier ecosystem, but the real challenge remains sustaining explosive long-term growth. This mirrors the powerful expansions of 2017 and 2021 when fees also dropped to these levels.

Liquidity thickens below $2,900

Ethereum’s liquidity clusters around $2,900 and $2,850 offered crucial downside support. Large buy orders in these zones triggered accumulation from whales, creating solid backing.

But what happens if the price drops below these levels? Will market makers hunt that liquidity, causing a cascading effect and leading to a deeper pullback?

At the time of writing, Ethereum [ETH] was trading at $2,908. Reclaiming and breaking the $3,000 level became the new benchmark. A successful reclaim and clearing of the downtrend could have pushed Ethereum toward the $3,200-$3,400 resistance zone.

However, momentum indicators like the MACD showed signs of weakness, and the RSI was in the 40s, indicating a lack of strong buying momentum. Ethereum’s ability to break the $3,000 resistance would have defined its next move.


Final Thoughts

  • Ethereum saw $117 million in net inflows into U.S. spot ETFs. While Fidelity absorbed most inflows, BlackRock posted net outflows, signaling selective positioning rather than uniform institutional accumulation.
  • Liquidity clustered near $2,900 and $2,850 offered support.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the net inflow amount for U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs on January 26th, and which firm dominated the session?

AThe net inflow was $117 million, and Fidelity dominated the session with $137 million in inflows.

QAccording to Glassnode, when was the last time Ethereum's Total Transaction Fees were as low as they were on January 27th?

AThe last time fees were this low was in May 2017.

QWhat are the two key liquidity support levels mentioned for Ethereum's price?

AThe key liquidity support levels are $2,900 and $2,850.

QWhat does the article suggest the RSI indicator being in the 40s signifies for Ethereum?

AIt indicates a lack of strong buying momentum.

QWhat resistance zone could Ethereum have moved toward if it successfully reclaimed the $3,000 level?

AIt could have moved toward the $3,200-$3,400 resistance zone.

Related Reads

Bitcoin Mining Farms Are Becoming AI Factories

Bitcoin mines are transforming into AI factories. This shift is driven by the convergence of three key assets from the previous crypto cycle: infrastructure, talent, and capital. Crypto mining companies like Crusoe, CoreWeave, and Bitdeer are repurposing their core competency—securing power, land, and grid connections in remote locations—to build data centers for AI clients. These firms are signing multi-billion dollar, long-term contracts with companies like Anthropic, AWS, and Microsoft, as AI's demand for reliable, high-capacity compute surpasses the profitability of Bitcoin mining. Simultaneously, crypto entrepreneurs and engineers are applying their skills to new AI ventures. Examples include OpenSea's co-founder launching OpenRouter (an AI model aggregator), and former Coinbase engineers building Fal.ai (a generative media infrastructure platform). Their experience in building scalable, global software networks translates effectively to the AI space. Furthermore, capital accumulated during the crypto boom is now fueling AI. Figures like Jed McCaleb (co-founder of Ripple) funded Voltage Park, a large-scale GPU cloud provider. Notably, some crypto investments, like FTX's early bets on Anthropic and Cursor, have generated astronomical paper returns, demonstrating how high-risk crypto capital flowed into AI before it became mainstream. The transition is not just about repurposing hardware, but about redirecting critical resources—power infrastructure, distributed systems expertise, and venture funding—to the next technological frontier: artificial intelligence.

链捕手1h ago

Bitcoin Mining Farms Are Becoming AI Factories

链捕手1h ago

Morpho Launches Fixed-Rate Product Midnight: Lenders and Borrowers Set Their Own Rates, Ending the Era of Interest Rate Models

Morpho Launches Fixed-Rate Product Midnight: Lenders and Borrowers Set Their Own Rates, Ending the Era of Algorithmic Interest Models On-chain lending has grown to $60 billion but remains minuscule compared to traditional finance's $200 trillion annual credit volume. Morpho identifies the lack of fixed rates and maturity dates as key bottlenecks. Institutions need predictability, not the passive floating rates set by algorithmic models. Midnight allows lenders and borrowers to directly quote rates, set terms, and become price makers, not takers. Fixed-rate lending is now viable due to cheaper, faster blockchains and the entry of institutions demanding control and certainty over returns, costs, and duration. Morpho Blue previously gave users control over risk; Midnight adds control over interest rates. Past attempts at on-chain fixed-rate lending failed primarily because they were built on top of floating-rate pools (creating unpredictability) or lacked sufficient active participants. Midnight avoids these pitfalls as a standalone primitive with fixed rates at its core, built upon Morpho Blue's existing large and active user base. Midnight offers distinct value: institutions gain predictable term structures and full control; fintech companies can offer tailored fixed-rate products; lenders/borrowers achieve predictability and efficiency; and curators can now differentiate by configuring both risk and interest rates. Morpho Midnight is not a replacement for Morpho Blue. The Morpho network will now feature two complementary market structures: floating-rate/open-term (Blue) for flexibility and fixed-rate/fixed-term (Midnight) for predictability. Liquidity can flow between them. The launch will be gradual, prioritizing security. Initially, it will support direct lending on Base network with one trading pair (cbBTC/USDC) and limited maturity dates. Advanced features like auto-rollovers will be introduced later.

marsbit1h ago

Morpho Launches Fixed-Rate Product Midnight: Lenders and Borrowers Set Their Own Rates, Ending the Era of Interest Rate Models

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片