Ethereum enters FTX-era stress: Is this structural deleveraging?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-01Last updated on 2026-02-01

Abstract

Ethereum experienced severe market stress reminiscent of the FTX era, driven by geopolitical tensions and forced deleveraging. Funding rates collapsed to extreme negative levels as ETH's price fell sharply toward $2,300, resulting in over $1.1 billion in ETH liquidations. Large holders, such as BitMine, faced near 40% unrealized losses with ETH trading far below its $3,800 acquisition cost. Both ETH and BTC reflected a synchronized market unwind, with price failing to hold above key resistance levels. Momentum indicators turned bearish, with support now tested near $2,400–$2,600. A break below could lead to further declines, while recovery depends on improved macro conditions and renewed institutional inflows.

Ethereum’s Funding Rates collapsed to FTX-era extremes as derivatives absorbed a violent macro shock.

Rising U.S.–Iran tensions reignited risk aversion, pushing Ethereum [ETH] sharply lower while leverage amplified the move.

As price slid toward the $2300 level, forced selling accelerated, liquidating roughly $1.1 billion in ETH positions within a broader $2.5 billion market-wide wipeout.

That pressure drove perpetual prices below their spot, forcing funding on Binance down to -0.028%.

Similar stress hit Bitcoin [BTC] over the weekend, sharing the same catalyst: geopolitical risk tightening liquidity.

Together, ETH and BTC reflected a deleveraging phase, where panic-driven flows dominated and market depth briefly vanished.

BitMine’s ETH position slips into structural drawdown

BitMine’s portfolio reflects acute stress as ETH trades near $2,415 against an estimated $3,800 weighted acquisition price.

The catalyst came from a sharp risk-off shock, driven by geopolitical tensions and forced deleveraging, which accelerated ETH’s 7-day decline of roughly 17.7%.

That move pushed unrealized losses to about $5.9 billion on a $15.6 billion position. This drawdown nears 40%, signaling structural pressure rather than noise.

The cost basis now acts as gravity, not guaranteed support. The timing below it reflects liquidity withdrawal and sentiment compression.

A shift would require easing macro risk, renewed inflows, and sustained spot demand. The distance from the cost basis defines the current drawdown distribution.

At press time, Ethereum traded near $2,430–$2,450, extending an 8–9% daily drop as capital rotated out of risk assets and into safe havens like gold and silver.

That shift tightened crypto liquidity, and ETH absorbed the pressure quickly.

Failed breakout hints at bearish structure

Price failed to sustain a breakout above $3,400, then slipped back through the $2,780–$2,800 zone as momentum faded.

This rejection reflects more than tired bulls. Macro stress and deleveraging amplified the move, accelerating liquidations and reinforcing a lower-high, lower-low structure.

Momentum indicators confirmed the tone. Weekly RSI trended below neutral, signaling weakening demand rather than oversold relief.

Meanwhile, MACD remained negative and compressing, showing bearish momentum persists but may be slowing.

Support now clusters around $2,400–$2,600, where buyers test conviction.

A clean break risks a deeper slide toward $2,000–$2,200, while stabilization would require easing macro pressure and renewed spot inflows.


Final Thoughts

  • Geopolitical risk drained liquidity, triggered $2.5 billion in liquidations, and dragged both ETH and BTC into a synchronized unwind.
  • ETH’s slide below the ~$3,800 institutional cost basis left large holders facing a near 40% drawdown, turning that level into gravitational resistance while price probes fragile support near $2,400–$2,600.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat caused the sharp decline in Ethereum's price and the collapse of its funding rates to levels similar to the FTX era?

ARising U.S.-Iran geopolitical tensions reignited risk aversion, leading to a violent macro shock. This triggered forced selling and massive liquidations, with roughly $1.1 billion in ETH positions being wiped out as part of a broader $2.5 billion market-wide deleveraging event.

QWhat was the significance of Ethereum's funding rate on Binance dropping to -0.028%?

AThe negative funding rate indicates that perpetual swap prices were trading below the spot price. This is a sign of extreme market stress and intense selling pressure, as traders holding short positions were paying those holding long positions to keep the market in a state of contango.

QHow does BitMine's ETH portfolio illustrate the concept of 'structural deleveraging' and what is its current drawdown?

ABitMine's portfolio shows acute stress with ETH trading near $2,415 against a weighted acquisition price of ~$3,800. This represents an unrealized loss of roughly $5.9 billion on a $15.6 billion position, signaling a near 40% drawdown. This is described as a 'structural pressure' rather than market noise, indicating a deep, fundamental deleveraging is underway.

QWhat technical factors, beyond geopolitical risk, contributed to Ethereum's bearish price structure according to the article?

ATechnically, ETH failed to sustain a breakout above $3,400 and then fell back through the $2,780–$2,800 support zone. This rejection established a lower-high, lower-low structure. Momentum indicators like the weekly RSI trending below neutral and a negative MACD confirmed weakening demand and persistent bearish momentum.

QWhat does the article identify as key requirements for the market to stabilize and for Ethereum's price to see a shift in trend?

AA shift would require an easing of macro geopolitical risk, renewed capital inflows into the crypto market, and sustained spot demand for Ethereum. The article states that stabilization is contingent on these factors, otherwise, a break below the $2,400–$2,600 support cluster risks a deeper slide toward $2,000–$2,200.

Related Reads

In Jinjiang, Fujian, a Storage Super Unicorn Lies Quiet

In Fujian's Jinjiang, a city known for sportswear, lies a quiet semiconductor giant: Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co. (JHICC). Once a promising domestic DRAM manufacturer alongside Yangtze Memory and ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), its journey was derailed in 2018 when the U.S. placed it on an Entity List and filed criminal charges for alleged trade secret theft. This halted production for years. A turning point came in February 2024 when a U.S. federal court found JHICC not guilty. However, it had lost crucial time. While CXMT soared to become a top-valued A-share company in 2024, JHICC, with an estimated valuation of 80 billion RMB, was just restarting. Its current output is primarily customized DDR4 chips, not the advanced DDR5/HBM demanded for AI, but it still benefits from the broader memory chip upcycle. JHICC's story is tied to Chen Zhengkun, a veteran engineer who left Micron to lead the venture. Founded in 2016 with state-backed funding, JHICC partnered with Taiwan's UMC to develop DRAM technology. Rapid progress was cut short by the U.S. actions, which Micron initiated, partly due to its heavy reliance on the Chinese market. Post-sanctions, Chen's team worked to rebuild the production line with reduced reliance on U.S. technology. According to its records, JHICC achieved small-scale production and revenue growth under immense pressure. It now focuses on the stable "niche" DRAM market (e.g., TVs, routers) with a monthly capacity of ~40,000 wafers, aiming for 60,000 by 2026. It holds over 1,000 patents but remains on the Entity List. For Jinjiang, investing in JHICC was a bold industrial leap. The local government provided unwavering financial and logistical support during the crisis, helping the company survive. JHICC has become the anchor for a growing local semiconductor cluster. Though its scale lags behind domestic peers, JHICC's persistence symbolizes a hard-won foothold in a global market long dominated by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron. Having missed one boom, it seeks a place in the new AI-driven memory supercycle.

marsbit42m ago

In Jinjiang, Fujian, a Storage Super Unicorn Lies Quiet

marsbit42m ago

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

**Summary: Key Events and Developments to Watch (August 3-9)** The upcoming week is marked by significant financial disclosures, key legislative deadlines, and notable product updates. **Major Financial Events:** Several companies are scheduled to release their Q2 2026 earnings. American Bitcoin (ABTC) will report on August 3, followed by SpaceX and Hut 8 Mining Corp. on August 4, and Circle on August 5. Notably, a significant portion of SpaceX shares (up to 12% of total shares) will be unlocked on August 6 following their earnings release. **Key Legislative Deadline:** The U.S. Senate faces an August 7 deadline to secure 60 votes for the CLARITY Act, a bipartisan bill aiming to establish a federal regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The Senate may hold a full vote on the bill during the week. **Economic Data:** The U.S. July Non-Farm Payrolls report will be released on August 7, providing crucial labor market data. **Technology & Product Updates:** * **Shutdowns:** DeFi portfolio tracker Zapper and wallet app Ctrl Wallet will cease operations on August 3. * **Upgrades:** LayerZero will deprecate its v1 relayers on August 3. XRP Ledger's new version 3.3.0, featuring five new functions, is expected next week. * **AI:** Elon Musk announced that the advanced Grok 4.6 AI model is set for release around August 7. * **Bitcoin:** The BIP-110 forced signaling for a potential Bitcoin network change is scheduled to begin around August 8. **Other Notable Events:** Chinese robotics firm Unitree Tech has set its preliminary price inquiry for its IPO for August 5. South Korean exchange Upbit will delist AQT and AERGO tokens on August 3.

marsbit2h ago

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片