Ethereum enters FTX-era stress: Is this structural deleveraging?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-01Last updated on 2026-02-01

Abstract

Ethereum experienced severe market stress reminiscent of the FTX era, driven by geopolitical tensions and forced deleveraging. Funding rates collapsed to extreme negative levels as ETH's price fell sharply toward $2,300, resulting in over $1.1 billion in ETH liquidations. Large holders, such as BitMine, faced near 40% unrealized losses with ETH trading far below its $3,800 acquisition cost. Both ETH and BTC reflected a synchronized market unwind, with price failing to hold above key resistance levels. Momentum indicators turned bearish, with support now tested near $2,400–$2,600. A break below could lead to further declines, while recovery depends on improved macro conditions and renewed institutional inflows.

Ethereum’s Funding Rates collapsed to FTX-era extremes as derivatives absorbed a violent macro shock.

Rising U.S.–Iran tensions reignited risk aversion, pushing Ethereum [ETH] sharply lower while leverage amplified the move.

As price slid toward the $2300 level, forced selling accelerated, liquidating roughly $1.1 billion in ETH positions within a broader $2.5 billion market-wide wipeout.

That pressure drove perpetual prices below their spot, forcing funding on Binance down to -0.028%.

Similar stress hit Bitcoin [BTC] over the weekend, sharing the same catalyst: geopolitical risk tightening liquidity.

Together, ETH and BTC reflected a deleveraging phase, where panic-driven flows dominated and market depth briefly vanished.

BitMine’s ETH position slips into structural drawdown

BitMine’s portfolio reflects acute stress as ETH trades near $2,415 against an estimated $3,800 weighted acquisition price.

The catalyst came from a sharp risk-off shock, driven by geopolitical tensions and forced deleveraging, which accelerated ETH’s 7-day decline of roughly 17.7%.

That move pushed unrealized losses to about $5.9 billion on a $15.6 billion position. This drawdown nears 40%, signaling structural pressure rather than noise.

The cost basis now acts as gravity, not guaranteed support. The timing below it reflects liquidity withdrawal and sentiment compression.

A shift would require easing macro risk, renewed inflows, and sustained spot demand. The distance from the cost basis defines the current drawdown distribution.

At press time, Ethereum traded near $2,430–$2,450, extending an 8–9% daily drop as capital rotated out of risk assets and into safe havens like gold and silver.

That shift tightened crypto liquidity, and ETH absorbed the pressure quickly.

Failed breakout hints at bearish structure

Price failed to sustain a breakout above $3,400, then slipped back through the $2,780–$2,800 zone as momentum faded.

This rejection reflects more than tired bulls. Macro stress and deleveraging amplified the move, accelerating liquidations and reinforcing a lower-high, lower-low structure.

Momentum indicators confirmed the tone. Weekly RSI trended below neutral, signaling weakening demand rather than oversold relief.

Meanwhile, MACD remained negative and compressing, showing bearish momentum persists but may be slowing.

Support now clusters around $2,400–$2,600, where buyers test conviction.

A clean break risks a deeper slide toward $2,000–$2,200, while stabilization would require easing macro pressure and renewed spot inflows.


Final Thoughts

  • Geopolitical risk drained liquidity, triggered $2.5 billion in liquidations, and dragged both ETH and BTC into a synchronized unwind.
  • ETH’s slide below the ~$3,800 institutional cost basis left large holders facing a near 40% drawdown, turning that level into gravitational resistance while price probes fragile support near $2,400–$2,600.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat caused the sharp decline in Ethereum's price and the collapse of its funding rates to levels similar to the FTX era?

ARising U.S.-Iran geopolitical tensions reignited risk aversion, leading to a violent macro shock. This triggered forced selling and massive liquidations, with roughly $1.1 billion in ETH positions being wiped out as part of a broader $2.5 billion market-wide deleveraging event.

QWhat was the significance of Ethereum's funding rate on Binance dropping to -0.028%?

AThe negative funding rate indicates that perpetual swap prices were trading below the spot price. This is a sign of extreme market stress and intense selling pressure, as traders holding short positions were paying those holding long positions to keep the market in a state of contango.

QHow does BitMine's ETH portfolio illustrate the concept of 'structural deleveraging' and what is its current drawdown?

ABitMine's portfolio shows acute stress with ETH trading near $2,415 against a weighted acquisition price of ~$3,800. This represents an unrealized loss of roughly $5.9 billion on a $15.6 billion position, signaling a near 40% drawdown. This is described as a 'structural pressure' rather than market noise, indicating a deep, fundamental deleveraging is underway.

QWhat technical factors, beyond geopolitical risk, contributed to Ethereum's bearish price structure according to the article?

ATechnically, ETH failed to sustain a breakout above $3,400 and then fell back through the $2,780–$2,800 support zone. This rejection established a lower-high, lower-low structure. Momentum indicators like the weekly RSI trending below neutral and a negative MACD confirmed weakening demand and persistent bearish momentum.

QWhat does the article identify as key requirements for the market to stabilize and for Ethereum's price to see a shift in trend?

AA shift would require an easing of macro geopolitical risk, renewed capital inflows into the crypto market, and sustained spot demand for Ethereum. The article states that stabilization is contingent on these factors, otherwise, a break below the $2,400–$2,600 support cluster risks a deeper slide toward $2,000–$2,200.

Related Reads

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit5h ago

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit5h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit5h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit5h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit5h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit5h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit5h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片