Dogecoin, Solana, & Other Altcoins End 2025 With Half The Weekly Volume Of 2024

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-01-01Last updated on 2026-01-01

Abstract

On-chain data from Santiment reveals that Dogecoin, Solana, and other major altcoins are experiencing a significant decline in weekly trading volume, now at less than half the level seen at the end of 2024. This trend is observed across multiple assets, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Cardano, BNB, XRP, Tron, and Chainlink. The drop in volume is attributed to recent price consolidation, which has reduced trader interest, as well as the holiday season's typical lull. Unlike the previous year, when altcoins remained active, current volumes are substantially lower. This lack of trading activity suggests muted price movement may continue unless unexpected news triggers market volatility. Dogecoin, for example, briefly rose to $0.128 but has since retreated to $0.122, reflecting the ongoing consolidation.

On-chain data shows Dogecoin, Solana, and other altcoins are currently seeing half the weekly Trading Volume compared to the end of 2024.

Dogecoin, Solana, & Others Have Seen A Decline In Volume Recently

In a new post on X, on-chain analytics firm Santiment has talked about the latest trend in the Trading Volume for the various assets in the cryptocurrency sector. This indicator measures, as its name suggests, the total amount of a given token that became involved in trading activities on exchanges over the past week.

When the value of the metric rises, it means trading activity related to the asset is going up. Such a trend can be a sign that interest in the cryptocurrency is increasing.

On the other hand, the indicator going down can imply investors are shifting their attention away from the coin as they are participating in a lower amount of trading.

Now, here is the chart shared by Santiment that shows the trend in the Trading Volume for nine major assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dogecoin, Cardano, Solana, BNB, XRP, Tron, and Chainlink.

How the current volume in the market compares against the same time from last year | Source: Santiment on X

As displayed in the above graph, the Trading Volume has witnessed a plunge across the sector over the last couple of weeks. Bitcoin, Dogecoin, and other assets have all shown price consolidation in this period, so the cooldown in trading activity could partly be due to traders getting bored.

Generally, investors like to trade more when price action is “exciting.” Volatile moves like rallies or crashes especially attract attention to the market. In phases of sideways price action, though, interest tends to die down.

There is also another reason behind the recent decline in the Trading Volume besides the price action: the holidays. From the chart, it’s visible that the holiday period at the end of 2024 also saw the indicator have a similarly low value for Bitcoin.

There has been one big difference in market behavior between now and then, however. As the analytics firm has explained:

Ethereum and other altcoins like Solana, Cardano, and Dogecoin were still seeing significant movement. This year, they have less than half the weekly trading volume.

What could be the consequence of this low activity? While hard to say for certain, price action usually tends to be muted when there is a lack of trading interest, as moves fail to build momentum in either direction.

Thus, it’s possible that the current phase of consolidation could stretch for the market, unless some surprise news drops that becomes a trigger for volatility.

DOGE Price

Dogecoin saw a surge to $0.128 earlier in the week, but the memecoin’s price has declined since then as it’s back at $0.122.

Looks like the price of the coin has overall moved sideways over the last few days | Source: DOGEUSDT on TradingView

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat does the on-chain data show about the weekly trading volume of Dogecoin, Solana, and other altcoins at the end of 2025 compared to 2024?

AThe on-chain data shows that Dogecoin, Solana, and other altcoins are currently seeing half the weekly trading volume compared to the end of 2024.

QAccording to Santiment, what is a potential reason for the recent decline in trading volume across the cryptocurrency sector?

AAccording to Santiment, a potential reason for the decline is price consolidation, which leads to traders getting bored, as they generally prefer to trade more during volatile or 'exciting' price action.

QBesides price consolidation, what other factor contributed to the low trading volume mentioned in the article?

AThe holiday period was another factor that contributed to the low trading volume, as similar low values were observed at the end of 2024.

QHow does the current trading volume for altcoins like Ethereum, Solana, and Dogecoin compare to the same period last year?

AThis year, altcoins like Ethereum, Solana, and Dogecoin have less than half the weekly trading volume they had during the same period last year.

QWhat is the potential consequence of low trading activity for cryptocurrency prices, as suggested in the article?

AThe potential consequence is that price action tends to be muted and consolidation phases could stretch, as moves fail to build momentum without significant trading interest or a trigger for volatility.

Related Reads

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片