Data: 75% of Traders on Hyperliquid Are Losing Money. What Are the Profitable Ones Using?

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-20Last updated on 2026-05-20

Abstract

On Hyperliquid, approximately 75% of addresses are losing money, indicating that manual traders are increasingly competing against automated systems. Profitable traders primarily employ one of three approaches: 1) Running systematic, high-frequency strategies (e.g., one address executed 261k trades with a 64.75% win rate), 2) Placing high-conviction, asymmetric bets with large positions (e.g., 50 trades yielding $4.48M at a 28% win rate), or 3) Using algorithms for execution while making manual macro judgments. The article argues that traditional methods like chart patterns or reacting to social media news are often already priced in by bots, making such traders the "exit liquidity" for systematic players. Success now depends on unique narrative timing, structural insights, or conviction during market capitulation.

Author: Stacy Muur

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: Three-quarters of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. It's not bad luck; the rules of the game have changed. While you're still looking at candlestick patterns for formations, arbitrage bots have already made their profit. Data shows that truly profitable traders either use algorithmic systematic execution or place large bets on asymmetric opportunities with high conviction. Manual retail traders watching screens are becoming the exit liquidity for others.

About 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are in a loss-making position.

The reality is that people trading manually on Hyperliquid are competing against systems that never rest. The trading opportunity you just discovered has likely already been priced in by the system.

When you see a certain pattern, chances are it has already been arbitraged.

Extreme funding rates are balanced in an instant.

Technical patterns have already appeared across more than 50 order books.

News headlines are priced in as soon as they appear.

What the most profitable traders are doing:

→1. Running systematic strategies (the second most profitable address executed 261,000 trades this month with a 64.75% win rate)

→ 2. Holding high-conviction positions, betting on asymmetric returns (a wallet made $4.48 million with just 50 trades and a 28% win rate)

→ 3. Using algorithms as execution tools while making macro judgments manually

If you have timing in narratives, structural insight, or conviction when everyone else capitulates, you can still make profitable trades.

But if your trades are based on chart patterns or news you saw on X, you are likely just exit liquidity.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what percentage of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money, and what is presented as the primary reason?

AApproximately 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. The primary reason is that manual traders are competing against automated, systemized strategies that execute trades faster and more efficiently, often pricing in opportunities before a human trader can act.

QWhat are the two main strategies used by the most profitable traders on Hyperliquid, as described in the article?

AThe two main strategies are: 1. Running systematic, automated strategies (one example executed 261,000 trades with a 64.75% win rate). 2. Holding high-conviction positions to bet on asymmetric opportunities (one wallet made $4.48M with only 50 trades, despite a 28% win rate).

QThe article suggests that several common trading signals are often ineffective. Name at least three of these signals.

AThree common but often ineffective signals mentioned are: 1. Technical chart patterns (which appear across many order books). 2. Extreme funding rates (which get arbitraged instantly). 3. News headlines (which are priced in immediately upon release).

QWhat role does the article suggest algorithms can play for a trader who still wants to make manual, high-level decisions?

AThe article suggests using algorithms as an execution tool. A trader can make macro or high-level directional judgments manually, and then use an algorithm to handle the rapid, systematic execution of trades based on that judgment.

QAccording to the article's conclusion, what kind of manual trader is most likely to succeed, and what kind is most likely to fail?

AA manual trader who succeeds is likely one acting on deep narrative timing, unique structural insights, or having strong conviction when others are capitulating. A manual trader who fails is likely one whose decisions are based on commonly seen chart patterns or news headlines found on social media (like X), as they become 'exit liquidity' for others.

Related Reads

Trade.xyz's Rebase Refusal Sparks Controversy, On-Chain Pre-IPO Market Faces Major Pricing Test

The debate surrounding Trade.xyz's refusal to adjust its SPCX (SpaceX pre-IPO) perpetual contract pricing amid updated share count revelations highlights a key challenge for on-chain pre-IPO markets. While several centralized exchanges (CEXs) paused and repriced their contracts after SpaceX's filing showed a ~10% increase in total shares, Trade.xyz maintained its market-driven pricing logic, which tracks expected per-share price sentiment rather than fundamental valuation metrics like market cap. This discrepancy triggered cross-platform arbitrage and caused leveraged long positions on Trade.xyz to suffer significant losses, as the platform's HIP-3 architecture lacks a native "Rebase" mechanism to neutrally adjust all user positions following such corporate actions. The incident underscores the difficulty for decentralized perpetual exchanges (Perp DEXs) to implement Rebase—a process CEXs handle by centrally pausing markets and adjusting ledger data. On-chain, this requires complex smart contract modifications, increasing gas costs, complexity, and potential attack surfaces. While some DEXs have managed similar adjustments, Trade.xyz's current design does not natively support it, though the team is reportedly exploring solutions for future events like stock splits. Ultimately, the controversy serves as a critical case study for the nascent on-chain pre-IPO sector, raising questions about price discovery reliability, transparent rule disclosure, and the readiness of DeFi infrastructures to handle traditional corporate actions as real-world assets (RWAs) gain traction.

marsbit4m ago

Trade.xyz's Rebase Refusal Sparks Controversy, On-Chain Pre-IPO Market Faces Major Pricing Test

marsbit4m ago

The 'Middle Eastern Prince' Swindles a Wealthy Woman: Renting Planes and Rolls-Royces, Scamming 120 Million Over Three Years

Two brothers who posed as "Middle Eastern princes" have been sentenced in the United States to 24 and 23 years in prison, respectively, and ordered to pay over $21.2 million in restitution and back taxes. Over three years, they fraudulently obtained approximately $21 million, primarily by promoting fictitious investment projects, including a non-existent cryptocurrency mining operation in a former General Electric industrial park in East Cleveland. The brothers, aged 42 and 33, created elaborate personas: one claimed to be a wealthy royal family heir and the city's "International Economic Advisor," while the other posed as a hedge fund manager with expertise from watching the TV show *Billions*. They bolstered their image by renting luxury cars and private jets and cultivating a relationship with a local mayor's chief of staff, who provided official-looking documents and government event access. A significant portion of the victims' funds, about $18 million, came from a single Chinese investor, a woman from Sichuan with experience in Bitcoin mining. The brothers also defrauded several women, including one former girlfriend. Their scheme unraveled when the primary investor discovered her $6 million worth of mining equipment had been sold off. The case highlights a trend of impostors using fabricated "Middle Eastern royal" identities to target wealthy individuals. Similar incidents include a "Dubai prince" who recently promoted a $500 million family office in Hong Kong and a Colombian man who impersonated a Saudi prince for decades in the US before being caught and sentenced in 2019.

marsbit19m ago

The 'Middle Eastern Prince' Swindles a Wealthy Woman: Renting Planes and Rolls-Royces, Scamming 120 Million Over Three Years

marsbit19m ago

a16z Partner: Being in the Flow of Capital Is the True Moat

A16z Partner: Standing in the Cash Flow is the True Moat Historically, many of the strongest companies built their moats by positioning themselves within "cash flows"—facilitating value creation and transfer in a network and taking a cut. The more value flows, the larger they grow. Crypto is the first modern technology natively built for this. With open ledgers, programmable settlement, and stablecoins enabling internet-speed global value transfer, it allows startups to inherit network effects from day one. Well-designed tokens align users, developers, and the protocol towards network growth, distributing value to contributors. This model isn't new (e.g., railroads, Visa, Google, AWS) but Crypto democratizes it. It lets entrepreneurs target areas with high inefficiency and profit extraction—like traditional finance's payments, custody, FX, and settlement—to compress costs, increase speed, and redistribute value by standing in the new flow. The opportunity extends beyond finance to emerging markets like GPU/compute, AI training data, energy, and space, where new, programmable infrastructure can be built without legacy constraints. Key questions for founders: Are you already in the cash flow? Does your revenue scale 10x with network activity? Where is profit extraction highest relative to value created in your market? The strategy is clear: compress the old cost structure, position yourself in the new value stream, and let the network compound.

marsbit46m ago

a16z Partner: Being in the Flow of Capital Is the True Moat

marsbit46m ago

Capturing 15 Top-Tier Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: A Consensus Protocol Debug Agent Framework Built by 0G Lab in Collaboration with Teams from NUS, PKU, and BUPT

"Agents Capture 15 Critical Zero-Day Bugs: 0G Lab's Multi-Agent Framework Automates Debugging in Consensus Protocols" Distributed consensus protocols are notoriously difficult to debug due to complex, intertwined states. A novel framework, Agora, developed by 0G Labs with researchers from NUS, Peking University, and Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, tackles this by fusing deep domain expertise with a collaborative multi-agent LLM architecture. Agora moves beyond the limitations of single LLMs and traditional testing like fuzzing. It employs three specialized agents: an Orchestrator for global state, a Strategy agent for generating attack scenarios using distributed systems knowledge, and a TestGen agent that creates executable tests. A core innovation is its efficient "Succinct Memory & Communication" mechanism and a dynamic test harness. This allows the system to translate abstract hypotheses into concrete tests across languages like Go and Rust, run them, capture failures, and refine the approach in a closed loop—all with minimal token overhead. In rigorous evaluations on production-level protocols including Raft, EPaxos, and components from etcd and Sui, Agora discovered 15 previously unknown deep logic bugs (e.g., execution divergence, liveness violations). In stark contrast, powerful standalone LLMs like GPT-5.2 and Claude 4.5 found zero such bugs. Agora achieved this with a high precision of 73.9% and at an average cost of only about $40 per bug found. The framework demonstrates high generalizability. Its decoupled design allows the "Multi-Agent + Hypothesis-Driven Testing" paradigm to be applied to other complex domains like database concurrency control, OS kernels, and Web3 smart contract auditing. By enabling efficient, automated detection of deep logic flaws, Agora points the way for AI-powered security in critical infrastructure, aligning with the growing trends of agentic systems and automated quality control.

marsbit49m ago

Capturing 15 Top-Tier Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: A Consensus Protocol Debug Agent Framework Built by 0G Lab in Collaboration with Teams from NUS, PKU, and BUPT

marsbit49m ago

a16z crypto Partner: Cash Flow Is the True Moat

Title: a16z Crypto Partner: Capital Flow is the True Moat In business history, enduringly successful enterprises often share a core logic: capturing value by facilitating its creation and transfer within an ecosystem, taking a share of the proceeds. The scale of value flowing through the ecosystem directly correlates with the company's growth. Cryptography is the first modern technology natively suited to this commercial logic. Startups that don't leverage this framework in product design and business model construction miss significant opportunities. Stablecoins enable internet-speed, 24/7 global settlement of value with end-to-end programmability. With open underlying channels for capital flow and transparent unit economics, every circulating dollar globally represents potential flow in this arena. Blockchain is inherently a network business model. All transactions are recorded on a shared ledger, and each new participant strengthens this foundational system for future developers. More users and applications increase the network's value for all. Crypto entrepreneurs start with built-in network effects, unlike traditional businesses that spend years building them on legacy infrastructure. Network tokens amplify this advantage. A well-designed token system aligns users, developers, service providers, and validators around a common goal—network growth—while distributing rewards based on contribution. All proceeds flow back to ecosystem participants, creating a virtuous cycle of value circulation. This is not a new logic; the crypto industry simply makes it easier for startups to implement and scale. Historic giants like railroads, Standard Oil, AT&T, and modern leaders like Google and AWS succeeded by positioning themselves at critical junctures of value flow. In finance, Visa processed $15.7 trillion in payments (net revenue: $35.9B), and top market makers like Jane Street thrive by being in the path of order flow, benefiting from volume. Combining capital flow with network effects creates one of business's most robust models. As Jeff Bezos noted, "Your margin is my opportunity." This is acutely true in traditional finance, where sectors like payments, custody, and settlements extract significant fees (e.g., 2-3% for card networks, 6-9% for cross-border transfers). These profits represent opportunities for disruption by reducing costs and increasing efficiency, as proven by Stripe and Square in payments. Crypto founders can build the next-generation infrastructure: programmable, instant, global, and inherently embedded in capital flow paths. Opportunities extend beyond finance to markets like compute/GPU trading, AI training data, energy, robotics, and critical minerals—areas poised for massive global value movement that existing channels cannot handle. These are blue oceans for new, programmable infrastructure centered on capital flow, free from entrenched platforms and intermediaries. Founders should ask: Is your business at the heart of a value flow? Does your revenue scale 10x with ecosystem transaction growth? Where are the highest margins relative to value created in your target market? The answers point to the opportunity: cut existing costs, enter new value flow arenas, and grow through network effects.

Foresight News50m ago

a16z crypto Partner: Cash Flow Is the True Moat

Foresight News50m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片