Crypto Group Pushes Back on CLARITY Act Bank Plan

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-14Last updated on 2026-02-14

Abstract

The Digital Chamber, a crypto trade association, has pushed back against proposals from major U.S. banks in the ongoing debate over the CLARITY Act. While acknowledging the banking sector's concerns about stablecoin yields potentially undermining traditional deposits, the group rejected automatic regulatory rules following a proposed two-year study. CEO Cody Carbone indicated openness to compromise, such as limiting interest-like features, but insisted on preserving incentives for transactions and innovation. Recent White House meetings between industry and banking stakeholders failed to produce an agreement, with both sides maintaining their positions. Patrick Witt of the President’s Council of Advisors warned that the narrowing legislative window before midterm elections adds urgency to reaching a compromise. The core dispute remains whether yield-paying stablecoins threaten financial stability or represent technological progress. With time running out, the fate of the CLARITY Act—which aims to provide regulatory clarity for digital assets—hangs in the balance.

The CLARITY Act debate has intensified after the Digital Chamber released a competing set of principles to challenge proposals backed by major U.S. banks. The blockchain trade association defended the current draft bill while signaling room for compromise on specific issues.

The banking sector has pushed for tighter restrictions, particularly around stablecoin yields. Bank representatives argue that allowing rewards or yield on stablecoins could weaken the traditional deposit system.

The Digital Chamber acknowledged banks’ request for a two-year study on the impact of stablecoins on bank deposits. However, the group rejected any automatic regulatory rulemaking that would follow such a study. CEO Cody Carbone told lawmakers the crypto industry remains open to negotiation, but it will not accept measures that effectively ban innovation.

Carbone emphasized that crypto firms already made concessions by limiting features that resemble traditional interest payments. He stated that the industry is ready to make changes to the static reward for holding, but still wants the flexibility to provide incentives for transactions. The coverage of developments in crypto regulations mentions that the stablecoin rewards are still a sticking point.

White House Meetings Signal Urgency

The recent meetings between the crypto industry and banking stakeholders at the White House did not lead to a final agreement. Both parties showed a willingness to continue negotiations, but there was no significant shift in their stance.

Patrick Witt, executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, warned that the legislative window is narrowing. He said that lawmakers need to act swiftly before the focus turns to the campaigns for the midterm elections. Witt called for nimbleness on the part of the crypto industry leaders and the large banks to come to a compromise.

“We’ve hosted numerous meetings and will continue to encourage negotiation,” Witt said in a statement that was made public.

Industry analysts monitoring the situation on WhiteHouse.gov point out that regulatory certainty is still a high priority for digital asset markets. Analysts at Yahoo Finance also point out how a lack of clarity on the CLARITY Act is holding back institutional investment.

Stablecoin Yields Remain Core Dispute

Banks say that yield-paying stablecoins could potentially steer deposits away from banks. They say that this could potentially destabilize lending and the financial system as a whole. Crypto enthusiasts say that rewards on the blockchain are a sign of technological advancement and not a threat to the financial system.

The Digital Chamber said that if banks do not agree to further negotiations, the industry will stick with the current stablecoin yield structure. Carbone called on banking organizations to come back to the negotiating table and work out a compromise.

This is just another reflection of the larger conflict between decentralized finance innovation and the existing financial system. Policymakers have to weigh the need for investor protection, financial system stability, and innovation.

Political Calendar Adds Pressure

Midterm elections loom large over the legislative process. Witt stressed that once political focus shifts fully toward campaigning, passing major crypto legislation will become far more difficult.

The CLARITY Act aims to establish clearer boundaries between securities and commodities regulation in digital assets. Supporters argue that regulatory certainty will drive investment and innovation. Critics caution against rapid approval without extensive review.

Both sides acknowledge that time is short. The coming weeks may determine whether the CLARITY Act advances or stalls indefinitely.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Truth Social Files With SEC to Launch Bitcoin and Ether ETFs on Nasdaq

TagsClarity ACTcrypto firmsCrypto RegulationsStablecoinU.S Congress

Related Questions

QWhat is the main point of contention between the crypto industry and major U.S. banks regarding the CLARITY Act?

AThe main point of contention is the treatment of stablecoin yields. Banks argue that allowing rewards or yield on stablecoins could weaken the traditional deposit system, while the crypto industry defends the innovation and wants flexibility to provide incentives.

QWhat concession did the Digital Chamber's CEO, Cody Carbone, say the crypto industry has already made?

ACody Carbone stated that the crypto industry has already made concessions by limiting features that resemble traditional interest payments.

QAccording to Patrick Witt, why is there urgency for lawmakers to act on the CLARITY Act?

APatrick Witt warned that the legislative window is narrowing as the political focus will soon shift to midterm election campaigns, making it far more difficult to pass major crypto legislation.

QWhat potential risk do banks associate with yield-paying stablecoins?

ABanks say that yield-paying stablecoins could potentially steer deposits away from banks, which could destabilize lending and the financial system as a whole.

QWhat is the stated goal of the CLARITY Act according to the article?

AThe CLARITY Act aims to establish clearer boundaries between securities and commodities regulation in digital assets to provide regulatory certainty that supporters argue will drive investment and innovation.

Related Reads

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit1h ago

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit1h ago

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

DeepSeek-V4 has been released as a preview open-source model, featuring 1 million tokens of context length as a baseline capability—previously a premium feature locked behind enterprise paywalls by major overseas AI firms. The official announcement, however, openly acknowledges computational constraints, particularly limited service throughput for the high-end DeepSeek-V4-Pro version due to restricted high-end computing power. Rather than competing on pure scale, DeepSeek adopts a pragmatic approach that balances algorithmic innovation with hardware realities in China’s AI ecosystem. The V4-Pro model uses a highly sparse architecture with 1.6T total parameters but only activates 49B during inference. It performs strongly in agentic coding, knowledge-intensive tasks, and STEM reasoning, competing closely with top-tier closed models like Gemini Pro 3.1 and Claude Opus 4.6 in certain scenarios. A key strategic product is the Flash edition, with 284B total parameters but only 13B activated—making it cost-effective and accessible for mid- and low-tier hardware, including domestic AI chips from Huawei (Ascend), Cambricon, and Hygon. This design supports broader adoption across developers and SMEs while stimulating China's domestic semiconductor ecosystem. Despite facing talent outflow and intense competition in user traffic—with rivals like Doubao and Qianwen leading in monthly active users—DeepSeek has maintained technical momentum. The release also comes amid reports of a new funding round targeting a valuation exceeding $10 billion, potentially setting a new record in China’s LLM sector. Ultimately, DeepSeek-V4 represents a shift toward open yet realistic infrastructure development in the constrained compute landscape of Chinese AI, emphasizing engineering efficiency and domestic hardware compatibility over pure model scale.

marsbit2h ago

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BANK

Bank AI: A Revolutionary Step in the Future of Banking Introduction In an era marked by rapid advancements in technology, Bank AI stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and banking services. This innovative project seeks to redefine the financial landscape, enhancing operational efficiency, security measures, and customer experiences through the power of AI. As we embark on this exploration of Bank AI, we will delve into what the project entails, its operational dynamics, its historical context, and significant milestones. What is Bank AI? At its core, Bank AI represents a transformative initiative aimed at integrating artificial intelligence into various banking operations. This project harnesses the capabilities of AI to automate processes, improve risk management protocols, and enhance customer interaction through personalised services. The primary objectives of Bank AI include: Automation of Banking Functions: By leveraging AI technologies, Bank AI aims to automate routine tasks, reducing the burden on human resources and enhancing efficiency. Enhanced Risk Management: The project utilises AI algorithms to predict and identify risks, thereby fortifying security measures against fraud and other threats. Personalisation of Banking Services: Bank AI focuses on offering tailored financial products and services by analysing customer data and behaviours. Improving Customer Experience: The implementation of AI-driven solutions, such as chatbots and virtual assistants, aims to provide users with more human-like interactions, revolutionising the way customers engage with banks. With these goals, Bank AI positions itself as a crucial player in rendering banking more efficient, secure, and user-centric. Who is the Creator of Bank AI? Details regarding the creator of Bank AI remain unknown. As such, no specific individual or organisation has been identified in the available information. The anonymity surrounding the project's inception raises questions but does not detract from its ambitious vision and objectives. Who are the Investors of Bank AI? Similar to the project's creator, specific information regarding the investors or supporting organisations of Bank AI has not been disclosed. Without this information, it is challenging to outline the financial backing and institutional support that might be propelling the project forward. Nevertheless, the importance of having a robust investment foundation is pivotal for sustaining development in such an innovative field. How Does Bank AI Work? Bank AI operates on several innovative fronts, focusing on unique factors that differentiate it from traditional banking frameworks. Below are key operational features: Automation: By applying machine learning algorithms, Bank AI automates various manual processes within banks. This results in reduced operational costs and allows human workers to redirect their efforts towards more strategic activities. Advanced Risk Management: The integration of AI into risk management practices equips banks with tools to accurately predict potential threats such as fraud, ensuring that customer information and assets remain secure. Tailored Financial Recommendations: Through continuous learning from customer interactions, the AI systems develop a nuanced understanding of user needs, enabling them to offer tailored advice on financial decisions. Enhanced Customer Interactions: Utilizing chatbots and virtual assistants powered by AI, Bank AI enables a more engaging customer experience, allowing users to have their queries resolved quickly, thus reducing wait times and improving satisfaction levels. Together, these operational features position Bank AI as a pioneer in the banking sector, establishing new benchmarks for service delivery and operational excellence. Timeline of Bank AI Understanding the trajectory of Bank AI requires a look at its historical context. Below is a timeline highlighting important milestones and developments: Early 2010s: The conceptualisation of AI integration into banking services began to gain attention as banking institutions recognised the potential benefits. 2018: A marked increase in the implementation of AI technologies occurred when banks started using AI tools like chatbots for basic customer service and risk management systems for improved security handling. 2023: The sophistication of AI continued to advance, with generative AI being introduced for more complex tasks such as document processing and real-time investment analysis. This year marked a significant leap in the capabilities afforded to banks by AI technology. 2024-Current Status: As of this year, Bank AI is on an upward trajectory, with ongoing research and developments poised to further enhance capabilities in banking operations. Continued exploration of AI applications hints at exciting developments yet to come. Key Points About Bank AI Integration of AI in Banking: Bank AI focuses on adopting artificial intelligence to streamline banking processes and improve user experiences. Automation and Risk Management Focus: The project strongly emphasises these areas, aiming to shift the burden of routine tasks while enhancing security frameworks through predictive analytics. Personalised Banking Solutions: By harnessing customer data, Bank AI enables tailored banking services that cater to individual user needs. Commitment to Development: Bank AI remains committed to ongoing research and development efforts, ensuring its adaptability and ongoing relevance as technology continues to evolve. Conclusion In summary, Bank AI exemplifies a crucial step forward in the banking industry, leveraging artificial intelligence to reshape operational paradigms, enhance security, and promote customer satisfaction. Despite gaps in information surrounding the creator and investors, the clear objectives and functional mechanisms of Bank AI provide a strong foundation for its ongoing evolution. As AI technology continues to advance and merge with the banking sector, Bank AI is well-positioned to significantly impact the future of financial services, enhancing the way we understand and interact with banking.

152 Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.06Updated 2024.12.03

What is $BANK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BANK (BANK) are presented below.

活动图片