Crypto Bill Faces a New Challenge, Delaying its Implementation

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-05Last updated on 2026-03-05

Abstract

The crypto bill, known as the Clarity Act, faces new challenges that could delay its implementation until at least July 2026. Banks and crypto firms remain opposed, with banks warning of potential deposit flight and risks to financial stability, while crypto companies support the bill for regulatory clarity and the ability to offer yield-bearing products. Despite criticism from former President Trump toward banks, the American Bankers Association has offered suggestions for the bill's advancement. In the Senate, Democrats are seeking additional conditions, including a ban on officials profiting from crypto and stricter anti-money laundering rules. The ongoing conflict in Iran and the approaching 2026 mid-term elections further complicate progress, though some remain optimistic about a potential agreement.

The crypto bill now has a new challenge, not overcoming the same, which could delay its implementation for a longer time. Banks and crypto firms are still on opposite sides despite the intervention of the White House. A maximum stretch has been drawn for July 2026 because months after that could see more focus on the mid-term election.

Challenge for the Crypto Bill

The Clarity Act essentially aims to state regulations for crypto firms more effectively; however, banks have penned a line to obstruct its implementation. Banks have flagged a possibility of deposit flight. This could affect their lending capacity, which is then expected to impact the macro economic condition of the nation.

US President Donald Trump has criticized banks by saying that they were trying to undermine the bill. Trump, in a social media post, called it a powerful crypto agenda and said that they would not allow banks to undermine it.

The American Bankers Association has sought a precautionary move to prevent deterrence to economic growth and financial stability. It has, reportedly, offered constructive suggestions for the advancement of the bill.

Support from Crypto Giants

Needless to say, crypto giants are in support of the crypto bill for two reasons. They have operated in gray areas for a long time, and they are still on the lookout to reward/recruit users in their ecosystem. The Clarity Bill underlines regulations that could help promote adoption of cryptocurrencies.

Another reason is that it enables crypto firms to extend yield-bearing products to users. Companies have reportedly spent approximately $119 million to support pro-crypto candidates in 2024, and are hoping to get a favorable result by July 2026.

Challenges in the Senate

Democrats have sought additional conditions before giving a green light. The crypto bill has to be supported by a minimum of seven democrats. The group has asked for a ban on officials profiting from crypto ventures and to tighten anti-money laundering rules.

The ongoing conflict in Iran is also making it difficult to have a discussion on the bill, according to a statement by Brian Gardner, the Chief Washington Strategist at Stifel.

Many anticipate that no discussion or no progress by July 2026 could delay the bill for a long time, as discussions would then shift to the mid-term election, which is scheduled to happen in November 2026.

Nevertheless, Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger has signalled that the path to a workable agreement is clearer than it was before.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

From Bear Trap to Breakout? Ethereum (ETH) Tests a Crucial Momentum Shift After a 7% Jump

TagsCrypto Bill

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason for the potential delay in the implementation of the crypto bill?

AThe main reason for the potential delay is a new challenge that the bill is facing, with banks and crypto firms remaining on opposite sides despite White House intervention. Furthermore, the focus is expected to shift to the mid-term elections after July 2026, which could postpone the bill for a longer time.

QWhy are banks opposing the Clarity Act for crypto regulations?

ABanks are opposing the Clarity Act because they have flagged the possibility of deposit flight, which could affect their lending capacity and subsequently impact the nation's macroeconomic condition.

QHow have crypto giants shown their support for the crypto bill?

ACrypto giants support the bill because it provides regulatory clarity after they have operated in gray areas for a long time, and it enables them to extend yield-bearing products to users. They have also spent approximately $119 million in 2024 to support pro-crypto candidates.

QWhat additional conditions have Democrats requested before supporting the crypto bill?

ADemocrats have requested a ban on officials profiting from crypto ventures and to tighten anti-money laundering rules before giving their support to the bill.

QAccording to the article, what external event is making it difficult to discuss the crypto bill?

AAccording to Brian Gardner, the Chief Washington Strategist at Stifel, the ongoing conflict in Iran is making it difficult to have a discussion on the bill.

Related Reads

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

The crypto market is currently in an adjustment phase driven by policy expectations and liquidity shifts. Despite a brief rebound fueled by geopolitical easing and SpaceX's strong IPO performance, unexpectedly hawkish signals from new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh have removed anticipated easing support. Concurrently, stablecoin liquidity is shrinking, with insufficient new capital inflows, pushing the market into a typically quiet summer period. Pricing lacks catalysts for a sustained rally. Daily trading volume has significantly contracted, stablecoin growth has slowed markedly, and the supportive effect of Strategy's (formerly MicroStrategy) STRC preferred stock-financed Bitcoin purchases is fading. Amid policy uncertainty, seasonal weakness, and liquidity contraction, Bitcoin faces near-term downward pressure. Warsh's hawkish pivot and refusal to provide a clear policy outlook have increased risk premiums, historically unfavorable for Bitcoin. Technically, the trend remains bearish below $73,700, with $62,446 as critical support. A break below could accelerate declines, though a prolonged consolidation phase, similar to 2022's bottoming process, is possible. Liquidity is a core constraint. Current daily volume is around $500 billion, roughly 25% of the peak during the July-Oct 2025 rally. The 12-month growth rates for USDT and USDC have fallen to ~20%, with 6-month growth near zero, indicating weak new inflows. Bitcoin ETF and Strategy-driven inflows have also weakened, with a 30-day rolling net outflow. With inflation at 4.2% above the Fed's target, combined hawkish policy, seasonal factors, and liquidity shortages challenge Bitcoin's ability to hold above $60,000. However, this adjustment phase may be forming a cyclical low this summer, potentially setting the stage for the next bull cycle.

marsbit17m ago

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

marsbit17m ago

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

Claude Code Usage Report Summary (Based on ~400k sessions) Core Finding: In agentic programming with Claude Code, a clear division of labor has emerged: humans primarily decide *what* to build (planning decisions), while Claude decides *how* to build it (execution decisions). Key Insights: 1. **Effectiveness is not limited to programmers.** In code-generation tasks, success rates for users in non-technical fields (law, finance, management, research) are nearing those of software engineers. What matters most is the user's domain expertise and understanding of the problem to be solved. 2. **Domain expertise drives success and efficiency.** Sessions where users exhibited "expert" proficiency in the task's domain saw verified success rates double compared to "novice" sessions. Experts also delegated more work per instruction, with Claude executing more actions and producing more output. 3. **AI is amplifying, not replacing, domain knowledge.** Claude Code lowers the *implementation* barrier, not the *judgment* barrier. The value of knowing the "what" and "why" is increasing relative to just knowing the "how" to code. 4. **Usage is evolving.** Over a 7-month period (Oct '25 - Apr '26), the share of sessions for debugging halved, while use for software operations, data analysis, and non-code writing roughly doubled. The estimated economic value of typical tasks increased by ~25%. Conclusion: The data suggests coding agents are making programming background less critical for completing technical tasks. However, they reward and amplify deep domain understanding. The ability to successfully direct an AI agent stems more from mastery of a specific field than from coding skill itself. The primary gains come from being competent in a domain; deep specialization adds only marginal additional advantage. This may signal a shift where software creation becomes integrated into various professions.

marsbit52m ago

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

marsbit52m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片