Confidential LIBRA Advisory Agreement Between Co‑Creator And President Milei Revealed

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-04Last updated on 2026-03-04

Abstract

A new chapter has unfolded in the LIBRA cryptocurrency scandal involving Argentine President Javier Milei. Judicial findings reveal a draft "confidential agreement" allegedly signed by Milei and LIBRA co-creator Hayden Mark Davis on January 30, 2025—two weeks before the token's launch. The document was discovered on devices seized from lobbyist Mauricio Novelli, a key figure in the case and close associate of Milei. This contradicts Milei’s earlier denials of any formal agreement with Davis. The token’s value surged after Milei’s public endorsement on February 14, 2025, but subsequently collapsed, causing an estimated $251 million in investor losses. Forensic experts also noted significant data deletion from Novelli’s devices, including missing communications with Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson, who previously accused Novelli of soliciting payments for a meeting with Milei. The investigation continues amid allegations of corruption and fraud.

A new chapter has unfolded in the ongoing LIBRA cryptocurrency scandal, as fresh judicial findings suggest that the relationship between Argentine President Javier Milei and LIBRA co-creator Hayden Mark Davis may have been closer than previously acknowledged.

The controversy traces back to February 14, 2025, when President Milei publicly promoted the LIBRA token. The endorsement triggered a rapid surge in the cryptocurrency’s price, followed by a collapse that wiped out an estimated $251 million in investor funds.

Now, according to local media reports citing court sources, computer forensics experts from Argentina’s Public Prosecutor’s Office have identified draft versions of a “confidential agreement” allegedly signed by Milei and Davis on January 30, 2025 — two weeks before LIBRA’s launch and subsequent crash.

LIBRA Deal Amid Milei Denials

The drafts were discovered on at least one electronic device seized from Argentine lobbyist Mauricio Novelli, a central figure in the case and a close associate of the president since the end of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Federal prosecutor Eduardo Taiano ordered the seizure of Novelli’s devices as part of the investigation. Experts later reported that the draft agreement appeared in exchanges between Novelli and Davis, suggesting efforts to finalize the document before it was formally executed.

The existence of such drafts stands in tension with Milei’s public denials. In multiple interviews following the scandal in February 2025, the president rejected claims that he had signed any agreement with Davis and sought to distance himself from the LIBRA operation.

Further details emerged in a January 9 ruling issued by the Directorate of Technological Support for Criminal Investigations (Datip), a specialized forensic unit within the Public Prosecutor’s Office.

According to the ruling, several copies of the draft “confidential agreement” were located during the forensic review of Novelli’s communications with Davis. The exchanges appeared to relate to preparations for the document’s eventual signing by the president.

Alleged Payment Requests Surface

The Datip report further underscored Novelli’s central role in the LIBRA affair. Investigators described him as a key intermediary connecting multiple actors.

His communications included exchanges with President Milei and Karina Milei, as well as with Davis, Terrones Godoy, Morales, and Julian Peh, the Singaporean CEO of KIP Protocol.

However, the forensic examination was hindered by significant data deletion. Experts informed Prosecutor Taiano that numerous messages, files, and even entire conversations had been permanently erased from devices belonging to Novelli and other defendants.

Among the missing exchanges were communications between Novelli and Cardano (ADA) founder Charles Hoskinson. After the LIBRA collapse, Hoskinson publicly accused Novelli and Terrones Godoy of demanding five-figure dollar payments in exchange for arranging a meeting with President Milei during the Tech Forum.

According to Hoskinson, they suggested that “magical things would happen” if he agreed. He declined. Investigators were unable to recover those deleted conversations in full.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.3 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from BBC, chart from TradingView.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the central allegation revealed by the judicial findings regarding President Milei and LIBRA co-creator Hayden Mark Davis?

AThe judicial findings allege that Argentine President Javier Milei and LIBRA co-creator Hayden Mark Davis signed a 'confidential agreement' on January 30, 2025, two weeks before the token's launch and subsequent crash, contradicting the president's public denials.

QWhat event triggered the LIBRA price surge and subsequent collapse that caused significant investor losses?

APresident Milei's public promotion of the LIBRA token on February 14, 2025, triggered a rapid price surge followed by a collapse that wiped out an estimated $251 million in investor funds.

QWho is Mauricio Novelli and what key evidence was found on his electronic devices?

AMauricio Novelli is an Argentine lobbyist and close associate of President Milei. Forensic experts found draft versions of the 'confidential agreement' between Milei and Davis on his seized electronic devices, within communications between Novelli and Davis.

QWhat significant obstacle did investigators face during the forensic examination of the devices?

AThe forensic examination was hindered by significant data deletion, where numerous messages, files, and entire conversations had been permanently erased from devices belonging to Novelli and other defendants.

QWhat allegation did Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano (ADA), make regarding Mauricio Novelli and Terrones Godoy?

ACharles Hoskinson accused Mauricio Novelli and Terrones Godoy of demanding five-figure dollar payments in exchange for arranging a meeting with President Milei during the Tech Forum, suggesting that 'magical things would happen' if he agreed, which he declined.

Related Reads

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit6h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit6h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手6h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手6h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片