Coinbase’s USDC Revenue Jumps as Stablecoin Debate Heats Up

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-24Last updated on 2026-02-24

Abstract

Coinbase's stablecoin revenue, primarily from its USDC share with Circle, surged to $1.35 billion in 2025, accounting for 19% of its total revenue. This growth occurred despite a net loss of $667 million in Q4 2025. USDC transaction volume reached $18.3 trillion last year, though Tether leads in market cap. The stablecoin sector's expansion has intensified regulatory debates, particularly around yield payments. The GENIUS Act prohibits issuers from paying interest, and proposed legislation may further restrict platforms like Coinbase from offering rewards on stablecoin balances, amid concerns over competition with traditional banks.

Bloomberg Intelligence reported that the stablecoin revenue of Coinbase associated with its USDC revenue share with Circle was 19% of overall revenue in 2025 and may surge two to sevenfold if USDC adoption in payments intensifies.

This comes regardless of witnessing a net loss of about $667 million in Q4 of 2025. As per the Q4 2025 shareholder letter of Coinbase, the firm earned about $1.35 billion in stablecoin revenue in 2025.

The figure was up from $911 million in its previous year, with $364 million in stablecoin revenue in just Q4 2025 solely, as interest income on USDC balances became a high-margin line for the exchange, contrasted with volatile trading fees.

The Significant Surge

Talking about stablecoins, they have also gone mainstream in usage terms. Overall stablecoin transaction volume hit a record $33 trillion in the last year, with USDC accounting for around $18.3 trillion of that, ahead of Tether’s USDT by transaction. However, Tether leads in market capitalisation.

The growth is the reason why the politics revolving around stablecoin yield have become so upset. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins, commonly known as the GENIUS Act, signed by President Trump last year, made a federal regime for payment stablecoins and specifically restricts issuers from paying interest or yield to holders.

That provision is supported by the banking lobby, as yield-bearing stablecoins could drain deposits from the traditional system. Banks and their associates now want to go further in the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 of the Senate negotiations by shutting what they witness as a loophole that still permits non-issuer affiliates, like exchanges like Coinbase, to pass some of the interest on reserves back to customers as “rewards”.

Draft Senate language of the market structure bill could go beyond the yield restriction and stop Coinbase from offering any rewards associated with the stablecoin balances.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Step Finance and SolanaFloor Shut Down After Treasury Hack Drains Millions in SOL

TagsCoinbaseStablecoinUSDC

Related Questions

QWhat percentage of Coinbase's overall revenue in 2025 came from its USDC revenue share with Circle?

A19% of Coinbase's overall revenue in 2025 came from its USDC revenue share with Circle.

QWhat was the total stablecoin revenue Coinbase reported for the year 2025?

ACoinbase reported earning about $1.35 billion in stablecoin revenue in 2025.

QWhich stablecoin had a higher transaction volume in the last year, USDC or USDT?

AUSDC had a higher transaction volume, accounting for around $18.3 trillion of the total $33 trillion, ahead of Tether's USDT.

QWhat is the name of the US law that restricts stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield to holders?

AThe law is called the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins, commonly known as the GENIUS Act.

QWhat potential new legislation could stop Coinbase from offering rewards on stablecoin balances?

AThe draft Senate language of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 could stop Coinbase from offering any rewards associated with stablecoin balances.

Related Reads

NVIDIA Begins Adding Soap to the Bubble

NVIDIA is taking on a dual role: not just as a leading chip supplier, but as a massive capital allocator across the entire AI supply chain. In 2026, the company has committed over $40 billion in investments within five months, targeting everything from optical fiber manufacturing and data center operations to foundational AI model development. This investment spree, described as a systematic "sprinkler" approach, primarily funds companies that are major buyers of NVIDIA's own GPUs. Critics, including analysts from Goldman Sachs, label this a "circular revenue" loop—comparable to a supplier financing a customer to buy more of its products. A prominent example is NVIDIA's investment in OpenAI, which is expected to generate around $13 billion in revenue for NVIDIA, much of which may be reinvested back into OpenAI. While CEO Jensen Huang dismisses the "circular financing" critique as "absurd," arguing the investments are confidence votes in long-term generational shifts, some analysts express discomfort. They note that while investments in critical supply chain components like optics are strategically sound, funding new cloud providers like CoreWeave feels like "pre-paying for your own GPUs." The strategy carries significant risks. If the AI investment cycle turns, the market may question how much demand is genuine versus artificially sustained by NVIDIA's own balance sheet. Despite posting record-breaking earnings—$215.9 billion in annual revenue and $120 billion in net profit for FY2026—NVIDIA's stock fell after its report, signaling that "beating expectations" may no longer be enough to assure investors about the duration of the AI spending boom. The article concludes that while a bubble isn't necessarily a fraud, NVIDIA's actions resemble adding soap to a bubble—making it appear more robust and durable. This creates a complex scenario requiring extreme冷静 from investors to distinguish between real structural growth and financial engineering.

marsbit13m ago

NVIDIA Begins Adding Soap to the Bubble

marsbit13m ago

Short Positions Have Been Squeezed Out: Will the Next Leg of the U.S. Stock AI Rally Continue in Seoul?

"Short Squeeze Exhausted: Will the Next Leg of the AI Rally Continue in Seoul?" A Nomura report suggests the US AI stock rally, which saw the S&P 500 rise ~16.6% in 28 days largely driven by 10 key stocks, may be pausing. The fuel from short covering, CTA fund positioning, and volatility-control strategies is nearing its limit. For the rally to continue, new momentum from retail and sentiment-driven FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) is needed. South Korea's market provided a potential answer on the very day the report was published. The KOSPI index surged 4.32%, triggering a buy-side circuit breaker, led by massive gains in chip giants SK Hynix (+11.98%) and Samsung. This surge is characterized by retail "hynix FOMO" and overseas funds precisely buying into AI themes via chip-focused ETFs, shifting from broad Korean market ETFs. The Korean rally is a high-beta extension of the US AI capital expenditure story, as major cloud providers plan massive infrastructure spending, directly benefiting memory chip leaders. However, this linkage also implies vulnerability. The sustainability of this next leg depends on whether US tech stocks correct, the trajectory of US inflation (with upcoming CPI data key), and geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz. Seoul has emerged as the new epicenter of the AI trade, but its fate remains tied to these broader macro and market dynamics.

marsbit18m ago

Short Positions Have Been Squeezed Out: Will the Next Leg of the U.S. Stock AI Rally Continue in Seoul?

marsbit18m ago

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbit1h ago

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片