Coinbase Flags Concerns Over CLARITY Bill

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-12Last updated on 2026-01-12

Abstract

Coinbase has threatened to withdraw its support for the upcoming CLARITY Act, a key U.S. crypto bill, if it restricts the ability of platforms to offer rewards on stablecoin holdings beyond basic disclosure rules. The exchange argues such limitations would harm its business and competition in the stablecoin market, particularly affecting rewards programs for assets like USD Coin. This stance follows the earlier GENIUS Act, which prohibited issuers from paying yields but allowed third-party platforms to offer rewards. Coinbase claims restricting platform-based rewards would undermine previous compromises and unfairly advantage traditional banks. The issue arises as policymakers work on broader crypto market reforms, with some senators seeking a compromise that would permit rewards only for chartered banks or trust companies.

As per the reports, it is speculated that Coinbase might withdraw its support for Washington’s upcoming major crypto bill. The firm is setting its boundaries as Congress moves closer to finalising its upcoming major crypto bill named the CLARITY Act.

In a report shared by Bloomberg on January 11, a warning surfaced as policymakers got ready to put up an extensive digital-asset market structure bill in the Senate later this week. Coinbase revealed that it may pull out its support for the CLARITY Act if it limits stablecoin rewards beyond fundamental disclosure rules.

As per the exchange, the issue directly hits its business and the competition in the stablecoin market, and the people close to the company’s thinking think alike. The ability to offer rewards on stablecoin balances, mainly USD Coin, remains at stake.

Association with the other Act

The debate trails through the GENIUS Act in July, which made the first federal framework for stablecoin issuers. That law bars creators from paying interest or yield associated only with holding stablecoins, but it does not obstruct third-party platforms from offering rewards to users.

Companies associated with crypto say that distinction was intentional. The officials from Coinbase state that prohibiting platform-based rewards would revoke compromises so far settled in the GENIUS Act and shift the field in favour of banks.

The firm has also mounted rewards as a way to make the role of the dollar in global digital finance more robust, mainly as different countries explore interest-bearing virtual currencies. Political pressure surrounding the bill is also increasing. In the election cycle of 2023-24, the crypto industry was leading in being the largest corporate political spender, in which Coinbase was a prominent donor.

The threat to withdraw support has weight as policymakers attempt to maintain momentum in the back of broader market structure reforms. Still, the final outcome is not clear. Some senators are looking for a middle ground that would permit rewards only for companies holding bank or trust charters.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitcoin Holds Near $92K as Asia Rises Ahead of US CPI Data

TagsCoinbaseCrypto BillGenius ACT

Related Questions

QWhy might Coinbase withdraw its support for the CLARITY Act?

ACoinbase may withdraw its support if the CLARITY Act limits stablecoin rewards beyond fundamental disclosure rules, as this directly impacts its business and competition in the stablecoin market.

QWhat is the main concern for Coinbase regarding the CLARITY Act?

AThe main concern is the potential restriction on the ability to offer rewards on stablecoin balances, particularly for USD Coin, which is a key part of its business model.

QHow does the GENIUS Act relate to the current debate over the CLARITY Act?

AThe GENIUS Act, passed in July, established the first federal framework for stablecoin issuers. It prohibits issuers from paying interest directly but allows third-party platforms to offer rewards. The current debate centers on whether the CLARITY Act will uphold this distinction.

QWhat is the crypto industry's argument for allowing platform-based stablecoin rewards?

AThe industry argues that prohibiting platform-based rewards would undo compromises made in the GENIUS Act and unfairly shift the competitive landscape in favor of traditional banks.

QWhat is one potential legislative compromise being considered regarding stablecoin rewards?

ASome senators are seeking a middle ground that would permit rewards only for companies that hold a bank or trust charter, attempting to balance innovation with regulatory oversight.

Related Reads

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

The article discusses using dice rolls to generate secure Bitcoin wallet seeds, providing entropy independent of potentially flawed hardware random number generators. It explains that each fair dice roll offers about 2.585 bits of entropy, with around 50 rolls needed for a standard 12-word seed phrase and 99+ recommended for higher security. This method gained attention after a vulnerability was revealed in some Coldcard hardware wallets, where a faulty firmware RNG (dating back to 2021) compromised generated keys. The analysis notes that while a dice-generated main seed was safe from this specific flaw, other Coldcard functions (like creating paper wallets, backup keys, or passwords) could still be vulnerable if they used the defective RNG. The piece argues that while dice-based entropy is technically robust, the manual process is error-prone, tedious, and unrealistic for most new users, who might make mistakes in recording or inputting rolls. It concludes that while manual entropy generation should remain an option for advanced users, the long-term goal is to develop reliable, user-friendly hardware and software that securely generates randomness without requiring specialized knowledge. Coldcard users are advised to check their firmware version and replace any secondary secrets (like paper wallet keys) created with vulnerable devices, while also considering multi-signature setups with devices from different manufacturers for added security.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Michael Saylor Says It Has Become Impossible to Adopt the Bitcoin Update He Opposed!

Michael Saylor stated that it has become mathematically impossible for BIP-110 to achieve the 55% voluntary support threshold within the current Bitcoin mining difficulty adjustment cycle. Based on his analysis of 946 blocks generated up to block 960,561, only 24 blocks contained version field signals supporting BIP-110. Saylor claims all these signals came from DATUM miners sharing rewards via the OCEAN mining pool, with no supporting signals from non-OCEAN miners. He argues this situation prevents BIP-110 from reaching the required consensus level and that the current signals do not represent broad miner agreement. BIP-110 is a proposal aimed at making it more difficult to embed large data like images or text into the Bitcoin network, beyond simple monetary transactions. Its proponents argue Bitcoin should be used primarily for sending money to avoid network congestion. Saylor opposes this, believing the Bitcoin network should not dictate which transactions are necessary and that rules shouldn't change based on the preferences of a few. He also suggests that high support metrics may be inflated by automated signaling software rather than reflecting genuine miner consensus.

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Michael Saylor Says It Has Become Impossible to Adopt the Bitcoin Update He Opposed!

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Number of Negative Bitcoin Comments Hits Record High: What Does This Mean?

Cryptocurrency analytics firm Santiment reported that negative sentiment toward Bitcoin on social media has reached a historically high level. The ratio of positive to negative comments about Bitcoin on platforms like X, Reddit, and Telegram has fallen to its lowest point since the firm began using its modern social monitoring system. A key driver of this sentiment is a vulnerability discovered in the firmware of Coldcard hardware wallets, shaking investor confidence in personal storage and cold wallets—previously considered the safest method for securing crypto assets. Santiment noted that while past crises like the collapses of FTX and Mt. Gox were larger in scale, the Coldcard incident uniquely shifted discussions toward hardware security and cold storage vulnerabilities, rather than centralized exchanges or leveraged trading platforms. Data shows only 0.58 positive comments for every negative one, indicating fear has significantly outweighed greed. Although the data covers just one day, Santiment stated the current panic level exceeds peaks seen earlier this year regarding war concerns and surpasses social media panic recorded during previous major crypto crises.

cryptonews.ru4h ago

Number of Negative Bitcoin Comments Hits Record High: What Does This Mean?

cryptonews.ru4h ago

SUI Stands on the Brink of a New Breakthrough as Bulls Target a Surge to $20

SUI token unlocked approximately 13.72 million tokens on August 1st, valued at around $9.9 million, representing 0.34% of its circulating supply. The release was part of a larger weekly token unlock wave. Sui utilizes a continuous daily vesting model to distribute selling pressure, unlike one-time "cliff" unlocks. Analyst CryptoPatel identifies the recent price range as a high-timeframe accumulation structure, suggesting a buy zone between $0.50 and $0.70 with long-term targets of $5, $10, and $20. However, the token has recently fallen over 5%, underperforming the broader crypto market, and social sentiment has turned slightly bearish near the $0.71-$0.73 support zone. Fundamentally, network activity remains strong. Mubadala Capital launched a $75 million tokenized private markets fund on Sui, and the network has seen the launch of a Bitcoin-collateral testnet and free stablecoin transfers. The price decline appears driven by the token unlock and general market conditions, not by network issues, highlighting a common industry gap between network growth and short-term token price performance.

cryptonews.ru4h ago

SUI Stands on the Brink of a New Breakthrough as Bulls Target a Surge to $20

cryptonews.ru4h ago

BlackRock and Fidelity Lead $265 Million Outflow from Bitcoin ETFs as Ether Price Rises

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of $265.4 million on July 31st, led by BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) with $122.7 million redeemed, followed by Fidelity's FBTC with $54.8 million. This contrasted sharply with the previous day, July 30th, which recorded a net inflow of $233.1 million, largely driven by IBIT. Meanwhile, spot Ethereum ETFs moved in the opposite direction, attracting a net inflow of approximately $9.03 million, with BlackRock's iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) leading. This divergence is part of a broader rotation of institutional interest toward altcoin-linked products, with observers linking the renewed interest in Ether to its role in tokenization and stablecoin settlements. The July 31st outflow continues a longer-term trend, marking the third consecutive quarter of net outflows for U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs. Overall assets under management remain around $105 billion, but uncertainty surrounding crypto regulation and Bitcoin's price volatility have heightened investor caution. As the largest fund, IBIT's daily flows are expected to set the tone for the broader Bitcoin ETF market.

cryptonews.ru5h ago

BlackRock and Fidelity Lead $265 Million Outflow from Bitcoin ETFs as Ether Price Rises

cryptonews.ru5h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片