Coinbase disables Ronin trading as Ethereum L2 migration enters execution phase

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-30Last updated on 2026-03-30

Abstract

Coinbase has suspended trading for Ronin (RONIN) as the network enters the execution phase of its migration to an Ethereum Layer-2. Users must transfer their tokens to a compatible self-custodial wallet before the upgrade is finalized; otherwise, assets left on the platform will become inaccessible. The exchange will not support the migration on behalf of customers. The move is part of Ronin’s previously announced plan to transition from a gaming-focused sidechain to a full L2, aiming to improve scalability, security, and expand into DeFi and consumer apps. Despite the trading halt, RONIN’s price remained relatively unchanged, trading around $0.0839 with a market cap of ~$64.5M, indicating the market had likely priced in the migration.

Coinbase has disabled trading for Ronin, marking the execution phase of the network’s planned migration to a new Ethereum layer-2 [L2] network.

In an update shared on 30 March, Coinbase confirmed that RONIN trading has been suspended, while user funds remain accessible for withdrawal until the migration date is finalized.

The exchange added that it will not support the migration on behalf of customers, placing the responsibility on users to move their tokens.

Users must transfer funds ahead of migration

Coinbase had first warned users on 3 March that action would be required ahead of the migration. According to the exchange, RONIN holders must transfer their tokens to a compatible self-custodial wallet before the upgrade is completed.

Assets that are not moved off the platform will not be accessible after the migration, Coinbase said at the time, highlighting the potential risk for users who fail to act.

The exchange had already shifted RONIN order books to limit-only mode earlier in March, restricting market orders before fully disabling trading this week.

Migration traces back to Ronin’s 2025 Ethereum L2 plan

The ongoing transition stems from Ronin’s previously announced roadmap to evolve from a gaming-focused Ethereum sidechain into a full-fledged L2 network.

Outlined in 2025, the upgrade aims to improve transaction speed, and strengthen security by aligning with Ethereum. It also plans to expand the network’s use cases beyond gaming into areas such as DeFi and consumer applications.

The migration was expected to be completed between the first and second quarters of 2026, placing the current developments within the project’s planned execution timeline.

Market reaction remains muted

Despite the trading suspension, RONIN’s price remained relatively stable.

At the time of writing, the token traded around $0.0839, down roughly 1.2% over the past 24 hours, with a market capitalization near $64.5 million.

Trading volume remained steady at approximately $3 million, suggesting no significant spike in selling pressure.

The relatively stable price action indicates that the migration and trading halt were likely already priced in following earlier announcements.

Final Summary

  • Coinbase has suspended Ronin trading as its Ethereum L2 migration moves into execution, requiring users to transfer funds independently.
  • Despite the operational changes, RONIN’s price reaction remains muted, suggesting the market had already anticipated the transition.

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Questions

QWhy has Coinbase disabled trading for Ronin (RONIN)?

ACoinbase has disabled trading for Ronin because the network is entering the execution phase of its planned migration to a new Ethereum layer-2 (L2) network.

QWhat must RONIN holders do with their tokens on Coinbase before the migration is completed?

ARONIN holders must transfer their tokens from Coinbase to a compatible self-custodial wallet before the upgrade is completed. Assets not moved off the platform will not be accessible after the migration.

QWhat is the ultimate goal of Ronin's migration to an Ethereum L2?

AThe goal is to evolve from a gaming-focused Ethereum sidechain into a full-fledged L2 network to improve transaction speed, strengthen security by aligning with Ethereum, and expand use cases into areas like DeFi and consumer applications.

QHow did the market react to the news of the trading suspension and migration?

AThe market reaction was muted. The price of RONIN remained relatively stable, trading around $0.0839 with only a 1.2% decrease, indicating the event was likely already priced in by the market.

QWill Coinbase support the migration process for its users?

ANo, Coinbase has stated it will not support the migration on behalf of its customers. The responsibility is placed on users to move their tokens to a self-custodial wallet.

Related Reads

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit3m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit3m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit3m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit3m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News14m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News14m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit30m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit30m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手42m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手42m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions