China Bans Unauthorised Yuan-Pegged Stablecoins Overseas

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-07Last updated on 2026-02-07

Abstract

China's regulators, led by the People's Bank of China (PBOC), have prohibited the unauthorized issuance of yuan-pegged stablecoins overseas and expanded the ban to include real-world assets linked to the currency. The joint statement, issued with seven government agencies, forbids both domestic and foreign entities from issuing such stablecoins without official approval. Authorities warn that these tokens mimic monetary functions and threaten monetary sovereignty, while unregulated circulation could undermine the yuan's stability. The ban also targets services related to tokenized financial assets, such as blockchain-based bonds or equities. This move reinforces China's 2021 crypto trading ban and aligns with its strategy to suppress private digital currencies while promoting the state-backed digital yuan (e-CNY).

The regulators of China have now tightened control for digital assets and have prohibited the unauthorised issuance of yuan-pegged stablecoins overseas and widened the prohibition to real-world assets associated with the currency of the country.

On February 6, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), with seven government agencies, released a joint statement stating that individuals and companies, domestic or foreign, may not issue renminbi-linked stablecoins without having official approval.

The regulators said that such tokens imitate prominent functions of money and could intimidate monetary sovereignty. Stablecoins attached to fiat currencies do some of the functions of fiat currencies, as per the notice.

The notice also warned that circulation outside regulatory oversight could reduce the stability of the yuan. The rules also aim at services associated with tokenised financial assets, comprising blockchain-based representations of bonds or equities.

What Does the Ban Further Comprise?

Overseas bodies are not allowed to offer associated products to users inside China if they lack permission from regulators. Beijing acknowledged its established position on crypto payments, confirming that assets like Bitcoin and ETH do not have legal tender status and that easing transactions or associated services includes illegal activity.

The policy created a sweeping ban rolled out by the central bank in 2021 that successfully eliminated crypto trading and payments from the domestic financial system. A legal polymath and ex-sovereign wealth fund official, Winston Ma, stated that the prohibition is applied to both onshore and offshore versions of the renminbi.

The offshore yuan, called CNH, is made for foreign exchange flexibility along with keeping capital controls. The steps seem to suit a broader strategy of prohibiting privately issued digital currencies while boosting the state-backed digital yuan.

China has spent many years developing an e-CNY central bank digital currency, and not long ago, it permitted commercial banks to share interest with users holding digital yuan wallets to boost adoption.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Binance Adds BTC to SAFU Fund, Gets Praise from Founder CZ

TagschinaDigital currencyStablecoin

Related Questions

QWhat is the main action taken by Chinese regulators regarding yuan-pegged stablecoins?

AChinese regulators have prohibited the unauthorized issuance of yuan-pegged stablecoins overseas.

QWhich central bank led the joint statement with seven government agencies on February 6?

AThe People's Bank of China (PBOC) led the joint statement.

QAccording to the notice, why are such stablecoins considered a threat?

AThey imitate prominent functions of money and could intimidate monetary sovereignty.

QWhat broader strategy does this prohibition seem to suit?

AIt suits a strategy of prohibiting privately issued digital currencies while boosting the state-backed digital yuan (e-CNY).

QAre overseas bodies allowed to offer related products to users inside China without permission?

ANo, overseas bodies are not allowed to offer associated products to users inside China without regulatory permission.

Related Reads

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbit30m ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbit30m ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbit1h ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbit1h ago

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

The Coldcard hardware wallet has been compromised, with hackers stealing approximately 594.5 Bitcoin (~$40 million) from 500 addresses in just 25 minutes. The root cause was a critical software bug, undetected for five years, which disabled the device's secure chip for generating true random numbers. This led to the creation of private keys based on predictable data like the processor's serial number, drastically reducing cryptographic security. The attackers exploited this offline by brute-forcing possible seed phrases, finding active addresses on the public ledger, and signing transactions. Initially, Coinkite (Coldcard's maker) claimed only older models were at risk but later admitted all devices running the compromised firmware were vulnerable. CEO Rodolphe Novak (NVK) apologized but ruled out financial compensation for affected users. To secure funds, owners must urgently update their firmware to specific safe versions, generate a completely new seed phrase on the updated device, and transfer all assets to new addresses created with that new seed. While a BIP-39 passphrase can help, it does not replace this migration process. Other Coinkite products like TAPSIGNER were not affected. This incident underscores that even specialized hardware requires rigorous, independent code audits, especially for cryptographic functions. It parallels past failures, like a 2006 OpenSSL bug in Debian, and raises questions about whether automated code analysis can ever fully replace human scrutiny in critical security areas.

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片