Cheaper to mine, harder to profit – The new reality for Bitcoin miners!

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-28Last updated on 2026-02-28

In the State of the Union address, President Donald Trump highlighted innovation policy in a bid to ease concerns over restrictive trade actions and reinforce the idea of economic resilience. While Bitcoin [BTC] briefly rallied to $69k, it has since retraced by 6% in under three days.

The long-term bearish pressure on BTC has put miners under increasing stress. Bitcoin’s “electrical cost” has fallen from $71k in Q4 2025 to around $53.5k now. This means it is getting cheaper to mine Bitcoin as the inefficient miners were forced to close operations, making it easier to mine.

AI and data centers are changing the Bitcoin mining scene

In August 2024, VanEck published a report underscoring the rising importance of Bitcoin miners in AI and high-performance computing (HPC) areas. They argued that miners were missing a massive valuation arbitrage opportunity.

They projected an annualized revenue of approximately $9.11 million per MW (megawatt, or 1 million watts delivered continuously, 24 hours a day for a year) for AI/HPC.

Bitcoin miners trade at an average of ~$4.5M per megawatt (MW) of installed capacity, while some data center stocks have been trading at $30 million/MW or more. If these miners can transition 20% of their installed capacity to AI/HPC infrastructure, they could “easily double their market capitalization by 2028.”

According to Miner Weekly, the revenue per megawatt and GPUs are not the only metrics to look at. The bond market is another potent lens to view the AI and data center boom with. Over the past 12 months, $33 billion of long-term senior notes were issued by Bitcoin mining/AI infrastructure companies.

The bond market revealed a “risk ladder” ranging from 4% for established, low-risk incumbent energy giants. At the high-yield end of the spectrum, Bitcoin infrastructure firms like CoreWeave paid a speculative-grade credit of upto 9.25%.

As VanEck noted, Bitcoin miners can leverage their existing powered sites to host AI/HPC workloads in under a year. The lenders priced them as growth credit, charging a sizeable premium compared to the established energy giants.

Bitcoin infrastructure giants are already making the leap

TeraWulf’w Q4 and full-year financial and operational results showed a transition from BTC miner to AI infrastructure player. Major deals such as the long-term lease commitments for 60 MW with Core42 and 380 MW with FluidStack “materially enhance revenue durability”.

Digital asset revenue fell in Q4 2025, compared to Q3. HPC lease revenue was up to $9.7 million from $7.2 million in Q3 2025 too.

Marathon Digital used its Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings call to outline a strategic shift beyond Bitcoin mining. The centerpiece of the shift was the joint venture with Starwood Digital Ventures.

MARA will contribute dedicated energy, while Starwood handles design, construction, tenant sourcing, and operations. MARA can retain upto 50% ownership while receiving access to Starwood’s institutional investment-grade capital.

This venture targets the conversion of its powered sites to data centers. Starwood Capital Group’s data center development platform is expected to deliver more than 1 GW of near-term IT capacity. A pathway to more than 2.5 GW is in place.

As Miner Weekly rightly notes, there is a big question hanging over these developments. The sustained demand for AI would make the premium capital acceptable. Assets would appreciate, and rising revenue would make debt refinancing easier.

On the other hand, a drop-off in AI demand would see hyperscaler buildouts lose momentum. The high debt would quickly become burdensome.


Final Summary

  • Fall in Bitcoin prices and rising difficulty meant Bitcoin mining firms saw their digital asset revenue fall in Q4 2025.
  • This has made it increasingly attractive and possibly even imperative for large-scale miners to transition a part of their computational capacity to AI/HPC data centers.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, why is it getting cheaper to mine Bitcoin despite the long-term bearish pressure?

AIt is getting cheaper to mine Bitcoin because inefficient miners were forced to close their operations, which has lowered the overall 'electrical cost' from $71k to around $53.5k.

QWhat massive opportunity did the VanEck report from August 2024 highlight for Bitcoin miners?

AThe VanEck report highlighted a massive valuation arbitrage opportunity for Bitcoin miners to transition into AI and high-performance computing (HPC) areas, projecting annualized revenue of approximately $9.11 million per MW for AI/HPC.

QHow did the bond market reflect the risk associated with Bitcoin infrastructure companies like CoreWeave?

AThe bond market revealed a 'risk ladder' where established, low-risk energy giants paid around 4%, while Bitcoin infrastructure firms like CoreWeave paid a speculative-grade credit of up to 9.25%.

QWhat strategic shift did Marathon Digital (MARA) outline in its Q4 2025 earnings call?

AMarathon Digital outlined a strategic shift beyond Bitcoin mining through a joint venture with Starwood Digital Ventures, where MARA contributes energy and Starwood handles design and operations, targeting the conversion of its powered sites to data centers.

QWhat are the two potential outcomes for Bitcoin miners transitioning to AI/HPC, as noted by Miner Weekly?

AThe two potential outcomes are: 1) If AI demand is sustained, the premium capital would be acceptable, assets would appreciate, and debt refinancing would become easier. 2) If AI demand drops off, hyperscaler buildouts would lose momentum and the high debt would quickly become burdensome.

Related Reads

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit28m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit28m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit1h ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit1h ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit1h ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

972 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片