Cardano Founder Shares What To Expect For XRP If The Clarity ACT Is Passed

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-05Last updated on 2026-03-05

Abstract

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson states that the proposed Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act could provide established tokens like XRP with clearer regulatory treatment, effectively granting them a "grandfathered" status that spares them from being classified as securities. However, he strongly criticizes the bill for its default treatment of all new tokens as securities, which he argues gives the SEC too much power and creates significant obstacles for future crypto innovation. He also highlights that the bill offers no protections or pathways for decentralized finance (DeFi) projects and stablecoin yields. In contrast, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse supports the bill as a workable starting point, creating a notable divide within the industry.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson says the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act could end up giving established tokens like XRP a cleaner regulatory lane, although the bill would set a damaging default rule for the next generation of US-based crypto projects.

During a recent livestream, Hoskinson complained that the framework treats everything as a security first. This could then force projects to fight their way out of that label through a process he says the SEC could easily weaponize. In the same breath, he suggested XRP may be among the assets that get grandfathered into safer treatment under the bill’s structure

Hoskinson Says XRP Gets A Pass

The Clarity Act is a proposed piece of US legislation designed to create a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies and digital assets. This bill has been advancing with US lawmakers and there are claims that it may be passed anytime in April. In a most recent livestream on YouTube, the Cardano co-founder interpreted the CLARITY Act as a line between legacy networks and future launches.

Interestingly, Hoskinson noted the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act could end up sparing established tokens like XRP and maybe Cardano from being treated as securities, essentially rolling XRP into a grandfather status and placing it among the networks most likely to benefit from the bill’s structure.

However, the same bill would leave decentralized finance with no real protections or path forward. He said “there’s nothing in this for Defi; nothing,” then pointed to Uniswap and prediction markets as examples of what he believes the legislation ignores.

He also used the stablecoin yield fight as proof that important parts of crypto’s products still don’t have a seat at the table. In his words, even Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong “can’t even get his yield-bearing stablecoins.” This is related to stablecoin yield regulations included in the Act.

Totally Against The Clarity Act

The comments in this livestream did not come out of nowhere. Hoskinson has been publicly negative on the CLARITY Act for the past few weeks, calling it a bill that looks like progress on paper but leaves loopholes for regulators to keep projects trapped under securities treatment.

The friction has also spilled into a high-profile industry divide because Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has taken the opposite posture in public comments, pushing the idea that the sector should accept a workable framework and then keep improving it through amendments.

Notably, Garlinghouse’s comments can be seen as confident the bill can pass on a fast timeline, even as leaders like Hoskinson call it flawed. Another industry name who has expressed concern is Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, who noted that the bill is giving way for banks to come in and get to do regulatory capture to ban their competition.

Price remains shaky despite rising sentiment | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the main concern Charles Hoskinson has about the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act?

AHoskinson's main concern is that the framework treats everything as a security first, forcing projects to fight their way out of that label through a process the SEC could easily weaponize, which would be damaging for the next generation of US-based crypto projects.

QAccording to Hoskinson, which established tokens could benefit from the CLARITY Act's grandfather status?

AHoskinson suggests that established tokens like XRP and possibly Cardano (ADA) could be grandfathered into safer treatment and spared from being classified as securities under the bill's structure.

QWhat does Hoskinson say the CLARITY Act offers for the DeFi (Decentralized Finance) sector?

AHoskinson states that the CLARITY Act offers nothing for DeFi, providing no real protections or path forward, and he cites examples like Uniswap and prediction markets as being ignored by the legislation.

QHow does the stance of Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse on the CLARITY Act differ from that of Charles Hoskinson?

ABrad Garlinghouse has taken the opposite posture, publicly advocating that the crypto sector should accept the CLARITY Act as a workable framework and then improve it through amendments, whereas Hoskinson is strongly against the bill.

QWhat specific regulatory issue does Hoskinson highlight using the example of Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong?

AHoskinson uses the stablecoin yield fight as an example, pointing out that even Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong 'can’t even get his yield-bearing stablecoins,' highlighting that important parts of crypto products still lack a clear regulatory path under the Act.

Related Reads

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit5h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit5h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手5h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ADA (ADA) are presented below.

活动图片