Cardano Founder Praises ShieldUSD Milestone On Midnight

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-17Last updated on 2026-03-17

Abstract

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson highlights the significance of privacy-preserving stablecoins, particularly praising the recent deployment of a minimum-viable ShieldUSD contract on Midnight's preview environment. Developed by W3i, ShieldUSD is a private stablecoin designed for confidential financial use cases like payroll and institutional DeFi, while supporting regulatory compliance through selective disclosure. This aligns with Midnight's core vision of a privacy-first blockchain using zero-knowledge proofs. Hoskinson's endorsement echoes his previous support for Moneta's USDM stablecoin, positioning ShieldUSD as an extension of regulated, privacy-focused digital dollars. The project remains in development, serving as an early proof-of-concept for Midnight's upcoming production phase.

Charles Hoskinson is again spotlighting privacy-preserving stablecoins as one of Cardano’s most consequential bets, this time tying his praise directly to fresh progress on Midnight.

In a post on X on March 16, the Cardano founder called the effort “one of the most exciting initiatives” and said it was “a bellwether for the growing utility of Midnight as a development platform.” That matters because Midnight has been positioned by its builders as a privacy-first chain built around zero-knowledge proofs and selective disclosure, with production-grade financial applications viewed as one of its core targets.

Why The Cardano Founder Is Bullish On ShieldUSD

The immediate trigger was an update from CTO at W3i Andrew Westberg, who said, “A minimum-viable shieldUSD contract has been deployed to the Midnight preview environment,” and added: “Right now, the constraints on contract size are limiting what we can do and requires a lot of consolidation transactions. We’re working closely with Midnight Foundation. We are able to successfully perform private transfers with selective disclosure for regulatory auditors.”

For Midnight, that is not some secondary feature. The network’s own documentation describes selective disclosure as a core design principle, allowing builders to prove validity or compliance without exposing the full underlying data on-chain. In practice, the idea is straightforward: transactions, balances, or identities can remain confidential to the public, while authorized parties can be shown only the information they are entitled to see. Midnight has framed that balance as essential for real-world financial use cases rather than purely crypto-native privacy experiments.

The stablecoin effort itself has been taking shape in public for months. In January, W3i Software announced shieldUSD, a privacy-preserving USD stablecoin for the Midnight Network, saying it would be co-issued by Moneta Digital and Norwegian Block Exchange. According to that announcement, shieldUSD is being built for financial workflows where confidentiality matters, including payroll, B2B settlement and institutional DeFi, while still supporting “compliance, auditability, and selective disclosure.” Midnight repeated that positioning in its January network update, presenting shieldUSD as one of the ecosystem projects intended to bring privacy-preserving finance into practical use.

That also helps explain why Hoskinson’s latest comment echoes his earlier rhetoric around Moneta’s USDM. Back in July 2025, he wrote that “Moneta’s USDM is becoming the most advanced stablecoin ever built.” Moneta describes USDM as a Cardano-native, fiat-backed stablecoin backed 1:1 by US dollar reserves, with Moneta Digital acting as issuer and redeemer. The latest Midnight work appears to extend that broader push from a regulated Cardano dollar into a privacy-preserving environment designed for more sensitive transaction flows.

Still, Westberg’s post made clear that the project is not presenting a finished product. The contract is only in Midnight’s Preview environment, which the network documents position as a development stage for builders migrating applications and testing new tooling rather than a live production venue. Midnight’s January roadmap update said the network is moving through its Hilo phase toward Kūkolu, the stage meant to introduce the first wave of production applications on a federated mainnet. In that context, the ShieldUSD deployment looks less like a launch and more like an early proof that Midnight’s compliance-friendly privacy model can be made concrete.

At press time, Cardano traded at $0.287.

ADA hovers below key resistance, 1-week chart | Source: ADAUSDT on TradingView.com

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the Cardano founder praising in his recent post on X?

ACharles Hoskinson is praising the progress on ShieldUSD, a privacy-preserving stablecoin, as a significant milestone for the Midnight development platform.

QAccording to the article, what is a core design principle of the Midnight network?

AA core design principle of the Midnight network is selective disclosure, which allows builders to prove compliance without exposing all the underlying on-chain data.

QWhich companies are co-issuing the shieldUSD stablecoin?

AThe shieldUSD stablecoin is being co-issued by Moneta Digital and Norwegian Block Exchange (NBX).

QIn what environment was the minimum-viable shieldUSD contract deployed?

AThe minimum-viable shieldUSD contract was deployed to the Midnight preview environment, which is a development stage for testing, not a live production venue.

QHow does the article describe the broader significance of ShieldUSD for Midnight?

AThe article describes ShieldUSD as a bellwether for Midnight's growing utility and a key project intended to bring privacy-preserving finance into practical use for real-world financial workflows.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit7m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit7m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit23m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit23m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ADA (ADA) are presented below.

活动图片