Canada Introduces New Crypto Custody Rules to Protect Investors After QuadrigaCX Collapse

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-04Last updated on 2026-02-04

Abstract

Following the QuadrigaCX collapse in 2019, which resulted in the loss of $123 million in customer funds, Canada’s Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) has introduced new crypto custody rules for exchanges. The regulations aim to protect investors by enforcing stronger custody arrangements, improved internal controls, and clear separation of client assets from company funds. The framework adopts a risk-based approach, requiring higher-risk firms to meet stricter standards while allowing flexibility for lower-risk platforms. CIRO will actively update the rules as new threats emerge and has the authority to investigate misconduct and impose penalties. The move reflects Canada’s protective regulatory stance, bringing crypto custody under existing securities laws.

The Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) has announced that Canada has introduced new crypto custody rules for the exchanges to reduce the risk of investor losses and prevent failures, as the QuadrigaCX collapse happened in 2019.

This move immediately takes effect after the direct response to the past crypto failure, like the QuadrigaCX collapse. QuadrigaCX was one of the canada’s largest crypto exchanges. After its CEO died, it has missed about $123 million of customer funds. Investigations later found that this was caused by its poor controls, weak governance, and serious custody failures.

What CIRO’S new crypto rules do

CIRO’S Digital Asset Custody Framework used a risk-based approach, which sets clear standards for protecting investors from hacking, fraud, weak controls, and poor governance. The firms which higher risk activities should meet the stronger custody standards, and the lower-risk firms get more flexibility but still need the protections.

After the new rules, crypto platforms in Canada should use stronger custody arrangements and improve the internal controls and oversight with clear separation of customer assets from the company funds. CIRO says many platforms are already following a similar structure, and any transitions to the new rules will be handled case by case without disrupting the firms suddenly.

Canada’s approach towards crypto custody

CIRO says that it will actively monitor the new risk, and the regulators will update the new rules if they seem to have any new custody threats and repeated problems across the firms. This shows that the framework still needs to be fixed and will evolve as per the crypto market changes.

Canada has taken a protective approach towards crypto regulations and is bringing crypto custody platforms under the existing securities laws. CIRO has the authority to investigate the misconduct, impose fines, and suspend the firms, which shows a strong focus on the custody and increased attention on stablecoins.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Ethereum Eyes Frame Transactions as Hegota Headliner

TagsCanadaCryptocurrency

Related Questions

QWhat event prompted Canada to introduce new crypto custody rules?

AThe collapse of QuadrigaCX in 2019, which resulted in the loss of approximately $123 million in customer funds due to poor controls, weak governance, and custody failures.

QWhich organization announced Canada's new crypto custody rules?

AThe Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) announced the new crypto custody rules.

QWhat is the main approach of CIRO's Digital Asset Custody Framework?

AIt uses a risk-based approach, setting clear standards for protecting investors from hacking, fraud, weak controls, and poor governance, with higher-risk firms facing stronger custody requirements.

QHow do the new rules require crypto platforms to handle customer assets?

APlatforms must use stronger custody arrangements with clear separation of customer assets from company funds and improve internal controls and oversight.

QWhat regulatory powers does CIRO have under the new framework?

ACIRO has the authority to investigate misconduct, impose fines, and suspend firms, showing a strong focus on custody and increased attention on stablecoins.

Related Reads

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit2m ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit2m ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

A social media claim has brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE) and the growth of its related ETF products. According to a June 20 post on X by AlphaOnChain, three Hyperliquid ETFs launched in May 2026 have collectively amassed $158 million in assets under management, led by a Bitwise fund with $88 million and a 21Shares fund with $66 million. The article notes this claim is from social media and not verified by official issuer data, advising caution. Nonetheless, the report highlights that HYPE is gaining traction as a notable altcoin narrative. Its focus on on-chain perpetual trading and exchange infrastructure places it at the intersection of DeFi and derivatives, attracting traders looking for high-conviction plays beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. The key takeaway is that while social momentum can influence short-term markets, sustainable growth for HYPE would require confirmed demand, liquidity, and continued ecosystem development.

bitcoinist1h ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

bitcoinist1h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit1h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit1h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit1h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit1h ago

Weekly Token Unlock: XPL to Release Millions in Token Value

Weekly Token Unlocks: XPL and SoSoValue Tokens Worth Over $10 Million Set for Release This week sees significant token unlocks for two projects. SoSoValue, an AI-powered crypto investment research platform, will unlock 13.03 million tokens, valued at approximately $3.87 million. The project aims to merge CeFi efficiency with DeFi transparency. Separately, Plasma, a Layer 1 blockchain designed for global stablecoin payments, will unlock 110 million tokens worth about $10.42 million. The network focuses on high throughput, stablecoin-native features, and full EVM compatibility. Both projects have provided their detailed token release schedules.

marsbit2h ago

Weekly Token Unlock: XPL to Release Millions in Token Value

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片