Bitmine Transfers 9,600 ETH to Coinbase Prime in Two Transactions

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-10Last updated on 2026-03-10

Abstract

Bitmine Immersion Technologies transferred 9,600 ETH (worth $19.5 million) to a Coinbase Prime-linked wallet in two transactions: 5,300 ETH ($10.75M) and 4,308 ETH ($8.74M). While such moves can signal potential selling, analysts note transfers to Coinbase Prime—a platform for institutional services—may serve various purposes and don't necessarily indicate an immediate sale. Bitmine recently increased its ETH holdings but faces unrealized losses of about $7.8 billion due to Ether's price decline, with its total crypto portfolio valued at $2.25 billion, down from a $16 billion peak in October 2024.

Bitmine Immersion Technologies moved 9,600 ETH, which is worth around $19.5 million, to the account linked with Coinbase Prime on Tuesday. According to the report from Arkham Intelligence, the transfers were made in two separate transactions. The analyst says that the transfers do not necessarily indicate that Bitmine plans to sell its ETH holdings.

Major two transfers

The first transaction transferred 5300 ETH, which is valued at about $10.75 million, and the second transfer sent 4308 ETH, which is roughly around $8.74 million. Both transactions were routed through an intermediate wallet before reaching Coinbase Prime’s hot wallet, widely used by institutional investors.

The latest movement in crypto can sometimes suggest that the investors are preparing to sell, but that may not be the case here. With tools for trading, custody, and portfolio management, Coinbase Prime is primarily intended for institutional clients. Because of this, the transfer to Coinbase Prime may occur for many reasons; consequently, the transfer by itself does not verify any immediate selling activity.

Bitmine raised more than 4.5 million ETH from its total holdings last week by purchasing 60,976 ETH. Despite its substantial holdings, Bitmine’s cryptocurrency holdings are currently valued at roughly $2.25 billion, down from a peak of about $16 billion in October 2024. This decline is largely linked to the fall in the ether’s market price, and estimates suggest that Bitmine is currently holding unrealized losses of about $7.8 billion on its positions. Recent transfers have drawn attention towards the blockchain, and analysts say that they should be viewed within the broader context of the institutional crypto operations.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Ripple Executive Says XRP Could Become the ‘Glue’ of Blockchain Finance

TagsbitmineCryptocurrency

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QHow much ETH did Bitmine transfer to Coinbase Prime and what was its approximate USD value?

ABitmine transferred a total of 9,600 ETH to Coinbase Prime, which was worth approximately $19.5 million.

QWere the ETH transfers made in a single transaction or multiple transactions?

AThe transfers were made in two separate transactions: one for 5,300 ETH and another for 4,308 ETH.

QAccording to the report, does transferring ETH to Coinbase Prime necessarily mean Bitmine plans to sell it?

ANo, the transfer does not necessarily indicate that Bitmine plans to sell its ETH holdings, as Coinbase Prime is used for various institutional services beyond just selling.

QWhat is the estimated value of Bitmine's total cryptocurrency holdings and how much have they declined from their peak?

ABitmine's cryptocurrency holdings are currently valued at roughly $2.25 billion, which is down significantly from a peak of about $16 billion in October 2024.

QWhat is the primary reason for the decline in the value of Bitmine's holdings?

AThe decline is largely linked to the fall in ether's market price, resulting in the company holding an estimated $7.8 billion in unrealized losses on its positions.

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit13m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit13m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片