BitMart Research Institute Weekly Highlights: A Comprehensive Market Analysis Amidst the Stalemate in the Middle East and Stagflation Expectations

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-24Last updated on 2026-03-24

I. Macro Level (Macro)

1. Geopolitics and the Middle East Conflict

Negotiations between Trump and Iran have seen repeated progress and setbacks, with a significant gap remaining between the demands of both sides. It is expected that the situation in the Middle East will likely remain in a state of "fighting while talking" for the next 2 to 4 weeks. From a political motivation perspective, Trump intends to push for a de-escalation of the conflict in the first half of the year to avoid facing both high oil prices and a pressured stock market as the election cycle enters its second half.

2. Federal Reserve Monetary Policy and FOMC Meeting (Hawkish)

Recently, the overall stance of major central banks, including the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, and the Bank of Japan, has turned more hawkish. The market has even begun to price in the possibility of the Fed "not cutting rates" or even "raising rates again" this year. The latest FOMC meeting was generally hawkish in tone: the dot plot showed an increase in the number of officials supporting only one rate cut this year; meanwhile, the Fed raised its inflation expectations, and Powell downplayed signals of a weakening labor market. Additionally, the previously dovish official Waller also shifted to support holding rates steady, further strengthening market expectations of a hawkish stance.

3. Diverging Risks of Stagflation and Recession

Risk Underestimation Camp: Some argue that the authenticity of the current non-farm payroll data is questionable, and inflation has been consistently above the 2% target for several years. If a significant external shock occurs, the U.S. economy could easily slide into stagflation or even recession, and the market is still not fully pricing in this risk.

Opposing View: Others believe that the U.S. is now a net exporter of energy, with far less dependence on oil imports compared to the 1970s and 1980s. Therefore, high oil prices alone are not enough to drag the U.S. into typical stagflation. The deeper risk of stagflation may instead come from long-term fiscal expansion and the erosion of the Federal Reserve's independence. However, if key Middle Eastern straits are blockaded for an extended period, and the Fed maintains a hawkish stance to suppress inflation, or even raises rates again, the market's main trading logic could shift from "stagflation trade" to "recession trade."

4. Performance of Traditional Financial Assets and Trading Strategies

Gold Plummets: Gold has not recently demonstrated its typical safe-haven attributes; instead, it has seen a significant decline against the backdrop of rising expectations for central bank tightening and liquidity pressure.

Hedging Suggestions: In the face of short-term uncertainty, it is advisable to hold risk assets while appropriately allocating positions related to the VIX (Volatility Index), as well as fertilizer and natural gas stocks that benefit from the logic of natural gas shortages, as defensive hedging tools. If the market can navigate through the volatility of the next 1 to 3 months, risk assets may still present good performance opportunities in the second half of the year.

II. Cryptocurrency Level (Crypto)

1. Market Trends and Sentiment

Amid intensified macro volatility, Bitcoin (BTC) has shown stronger resilience compared to gold, generally maintaining relative stability around $70,000. Recently, BTC rebounded from $76,000 before falling back and entering a consolidation phase. Current spot and futures market trading volumes are relatively low, while the options market is more active. The rise in put option (Put) skew and prices reflects increased market避险 (risk-off) and panic sentiment.

2. Institutional Moves and ETFs

Institutional capital allocation is showing divergence. MicroStrategy's Bitcoin buying intensity has noticeably cooled, dropping from weekly additions of ten to twenty thousand coins in the past to about 1,000 coins. However, other institutions continue to buy Ethereum on a large scale, with weekly purchases of around 60,000 coins. Overall, Bitcoin spot ETFs are still maintaining slight net inflows.

3. On-Chain Data and Bottom Assessment

From on-chain data, the profit level of long-term holders has fallen back to the consolidation range (green zone) corresponding to the bottom of the last bull-bear cycle. This suggests that the most intense phase of the decline may be over, and the market is in a process of gradual bottoming. At the same time, short-term holders exhibited significant profit-taking behavior around $76,000, creating阶段性 (phase-specific) selling pressure.

4. Regulatory Positive (Clarity Act)

On the regulatory front, resistance to further consensus on the Cryptocurrency Clarity Act in the Senate has decreased. The market assesses its probability of passage has increased to 80%-90%. Concurrently, the banking system may gradually relax restrictions, allowing users to participate in yield-bearing products related to stablecoins through indirect means. This is seen as a clear policy positive, potentially opening channels for larger-scale capital from traditional finance to enter the crypto market.

Related Reads

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing 1 million historical developers, emphasizing that this figure represents the largest pool of technical talent ever assembled around an open, permissionless blockchain network. While approximately 232,000 developers remain active, the key question for the crypto industry is not which chain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's advantage lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and a cohesive culture, making it the default operating system for programmable finance. This developer base is tackling complex challenges: the Glamsterdam upgrade aims to enhance scalability while preserving core principles; synchronous composability seeks to unify Rollup ecosystems; and significant efforts are underway for post-quantum security. Ethereum's deeper network effects stem from composability and shared standards (like the EVM and Solidity), creating a flywheel of more developers, tools, and liquidity. Three reinforcing strengths cement Ethereum's lead: credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), a modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a culture that attracts top researchers. The ecosystem is consolidating as the trusted coordination layer for internet-native finance, favored by large institutions valuing security and liquidity. The future of Ethereum is being built by this global community of founders and architects.

链捕手6m ago

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

链捕手6m ago

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

"Chinese Soil Chokes Japanese Giants" The production of a key electronic specialty gas, tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), vital for manufacturing AI chips, was halted by two leading Japanese producers—Kanto Denka and Central Glass. Their shutdown was not due to a technological failure but a sudden, critical shortage of a raw material they had long taken for granted: ultra-high-purity (6N-grade) tungsten powder, which is almost entirely sourced from China. Following a quiet Chinese export announcement in January 2026, tungsten powder shipments to Japan dropped to zero for months. Despite frantic efforts, Japanese companies found no viable alternative; imported powder was three times more expensive and lacked the required purity. Their existing stockpiles were exhausted by mid-2026. WF6 is essential for depositing tungsten into the microscopic contact holes of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips, which are crucial for advanced processors like those from Nvidia. While Japanese firms had mastered producing ultra-pure WF6 gas, their entire supply chain relied on China's 6N tungsten powder—a dependency now revealed as a fatal vulnerability. China's dominance in this "soil" results from decades of painstaking R&D by companies like Xiamen Tungsten and China Tungsten & Hightech. They overcame immense technical hurdles, such as separating chemically similar molybdenum from tungsten, to achieve mass production of the world's purest tungsten powder. With their primary suppliers gone, Kanto Denka and Central Glass announced a permanent halt to WF6 production starting July 1, 2026. This immediately created a supply crisis for major semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung and SK Hynix, forcing them to urgently seek and certify new Chinese suppliers for WF6 itself. The reversal marks a dramatic shift: China has moved from exporting low-value raw materials to controlling the high-purity foundation of a critical global tech supply chain, upending a long-established industrial hierarchy.

marsbit37m ago

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

marsbit37m ago

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

The article centers on the crucial question posed in the title: what is Seyond Technology really worth if its dominant customer, Tencent, were to stop purchasing its AI chips? As the last of China's "Four AI Chip Dragons" to secure approval for a public listing, Seyond's IPO filing reveals a profound and controversial dependency. In 2025, 74.9% to over 80% of its revenue came from Tencent. The piece argues that this extreme customer concentration is not merely a vulnerability but a strategic outcome of China's AI industry evolution. It contrasts Seyond's path with its peers (Moore Thread, Biren Technology, and MetaX), noting that while others raced to market with ambitious stories, Seyond focused first on securing and delivering for a major client. Its explosive revenue growth—with Q1 2026 up 1474.85% year-on-year—is driven by concentrated orders from Tencent, which itself faces massive, escalating AI compute demands for products like its Yuanbao and Hunyuan models. The relationship is framed as a deliberate, symbiotic cultivation of a supply chain. As both a major shareholder (20.26%) and primary client, Tencent is actively fostering Seyond to build a controllable, stable alternative to NVIDIA, similar to how global tech giants historically nurtured key suppliers. The high switching costs—involving software stacks and deployed systems—create a deep "ecological moat" for Seyond within Tencent's ecosystem. The analysis positions the AI chip landscape in three tiers: NVIDIA as the global leader, Huawei's Ascend as the state-backed player, and commercial firms like Seyond competing for market orders. Seyond is increasingly seen as "Tencent's compute foundation," with its product roadmap closely aligned with the tech giant's needs. The conclusion is that the industry's metric for success is shifting from fundraising and technical specs to real orders, delivery capability, and ecosystem binding. Seyond's value, therefore, lies not just in its chips but in holding a massive, multi-year procurement order from China's largest internet company—a tangible asset arguably more telling than any technical whitepaper in the current climate. The core insight is that for domestic chips, the ultimate challenge isn't just catching up technologically with NVIDIA, but earning the trust, scenarios, and recurring orders from a major anchor client.

marsbit1h ago

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片