BitMart Research Institute Weekly Highlights: A Comprehensive Market Analysis Amidst the Stalemate in the Middle East and Stagflation Expectations

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-24Last updated on 2026-03-24

I. Macro Level (Macro)

1. Geopolitics and the Middle East Conflict

Negotiations between Trump and Iran have seen repeated progress and setbacks, with a significant gap remaining between the demands of both sides. It is expected that the situation in the Middle East will likely remain in a state of "fighting while talking" for the next 2 to 4 weeks. From a political motivation perspective, Trump intends to push for a de-escalation of the conflict in the first half of the year to avoid facing both high oil prices and a pressured stock market as the election cycle enters its second half.

2. Federal Reserve Monetary Policy and FOMC Meeting (Hawkish)

Recently, the overall stance of major central banks, including the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, and the Bank of Japan, has turned more hawkish. The market has even begun to price in the possibility of the Fed "not cutting rates" or even "raising rates again" this year. The latest FOMC meeting was generally hawkish in tone: the dot plot showed an increase in the number of officials supporting only one rate cut this year; meanwhile, the Fed raised its inflation expectations, and Powell downplayed signals of a weakening labor market. Additionally, the previously dovish official Waller also shifted to support holding rates steady, further strengthening market expectations of a hawkish stance.

3. Diverging Risks of Stagflation and Recession

Risk Underestimation Camp: Some argue that the authenticity of the current non-farm payroll data is questionable, and inflation has been consistently above the 2% target for several years. If a significant external shock occurs, the U.S. economy could easily slide into stagflation or even recession, and the market is still not fully pricing in this risk.

Opposing View: Others believe that the U.S. is now a net exporter of energy, with far less dependence on oil imports compared to the 1970s and 1980s. Therefore, high oil prices alone are not enough to drag the U.S. into typical stagflation. The deeper risk of stagflation may instead come from long-term fiscal expansion and the erosion of the Federal Reserve's independence. However, if key Middle Eastern straits are blockaded for an extended period, and the Fed maintains a hawkish stance to suppress inflation, or even raises rates again, the market's main trading logic could shift from "stagflation trade" to "recession trade."

4. Performance of Traditional Financial Assets and Trading Strategies

Gold Plummets: Gold has not recently demonstrated its typical safe-haven attributes; instead, it has seen a significant decline against the backdrop of rising expectations for central bank tightening and liquidity pressure.

Hedging Suggestions: In the face of short-term uncertainty, it is advisable to hold risk assets while appropriately allocating positions related to the VIX (Volatility Index), as well as fertilizer and natural gas stocks that benefit from the logic of natural gas shortages, as defensive hedging tools. If the market can navigate through the volatility of the next 1 to 3 months, risk assets may still present good performance opportunities in the second half of the year.

II. Cryptocurrency Level (Crypto)

1. Market Trends and Sentiment

Amid intensified macro volatility, Bitcoin (BTC) has shown stronger resilience compared to gold, generally maintaining relative stability around $70,000. Recently, BTC rebounded from $76,000 before falling back and entering a consolidation phase. Current spot and futures market trading volumes are relatively low, while the options market is more active. The rise in put option (Put) skew and prices reflects increased market避险 (risk-off) and panic sentiment.

2. Institutional Moves and ETFs

Institutional capital allocation is showing divergence. MicroStrategy's Bitcoin buying intensity has noticeably cooled, dropping from weekly additions of ten to twenty thousand coins in the past to about 1,000 coins. However, other institutions continue to buy Ethereum on a large scale, with weekly purchases of around 60,000 coins. Overall, Bitcoin spot ETFs are still maintaining slight net inflows.

3. On-Chain Data and Bottom Assessment

From on-chain data, the profit level of long-term holders has fallen back to the consolidation range (green zone) corresponding to the bottom of the last bull-bear cycle. This suggests that the most intense phase of the decline may be over, and the market is in a process of gradual bottoming. At the same time, short-term holders exhibited significant profit-taking behavior around $76,000, creating阶段性 (phase-specific) selling pressure.

4. Regulatory Positive (Clarity Act)

On the regulatory front, resistance to further consensus on the Cryptocurrency Clarity Act in the Senate has decreased. The market assesses its probability of passage has increased to 80%-90%. Concurrently, the banking system may gradually relax restrictions, allowing users to participate in yield-bearing products related to stablecoins through indirect means. This is seen as a clear policy positive, potentially opening channels for larger-scale capital from traditional finance to enter the crypto market.

Related Reads

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit6h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit6h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手6h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手6h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片