Bitcoin’s THIS profit signal is weakening — Why BTC traders should watch

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-04Last updated on 2026-02-04

Abstract

Bitcoin's key profit signal, the Realized Profit/Loss Ratio (90-day SMA), is weakening and approaching the neutral level of 1, indicating shrinking profit dominance and increased loss realization. This reflects mounting market stress, though not full capitulation. Concurrently, the MVRV Z-Score has compressed to its lowest since October 2022, pulling prices closer to fair value and reducing speculative excess. The NVT Golden Cross has deteriorated sharply, signaling weak on-chain transaction support for current valuations. Furthermore, declining exchange reserves and persistent outflows point to thinning liquidity, which amplifies price volatility. Despite these pressures, continuous coin withdrawals suggest strategic accumulation rather than panic selling. The overall metrics describe a phase of controlled stress, where Bitcoin is closer to stabilization but remains in a volatile, neutral environment awaiting a recovery in network demand or facing prolonged compression.

Bitcoin’s Realized Profit/Loss Ratio (90-day SMA) continues trending lower near ~1.5, steadily approaching the neutral 1 level.

This move reflects shrinking profit dominance as realized losses increase across the market.

Traders now capture fewer gains, while loss realization appears more frequently during downside moves.

However, this shift also highlights thinning liquidity. Smaller sell flows now exert greater influence on the Bitcoin [BTC] price.

As a result, volatility intensifies even without panic behavior. Importantly, the ratio remains above 1. Historically, sustained breaks below that threshold aligned with broad-based capitulation.

Therefore, current conditions signal mounting stress rather than full exhaustion. The market absorbs pressure gradually, creating hesitation instead of widespread forced selling.

MVRV compression pulls expectations back to fair value

Bitcoin’s MVRV Z-Score has compressed to its lowest level since October 2022, a period when the price last traded near $29K.

This compression confirms a deep reset in unrealized profitability. Price now trades closer to aggregate cost basis, removing excess speculative positioning.

Consequently, emotional leverage fades across the market. Holders no longer sit on extreme paper gains, which tempers both greed and reactive selling.

However, this reset also removes comfort. Investors must now rely on conviction rather than unrealized buffers.

Historically, similar compressions marked transition zones rather than immediate trend reversals.

Therefore, the metric frames a neutral environment where accumulation and distribution coexist without clear dominance.

NVT Golden Cross weakens the valuation narrative

Bitcoin’s NVT Golden Cross has fallen to -1.4357, reflecting a reported decline of -135.42%. This sharp deterioration signals weakening network valuation efficiency.

Transaction value no longer supports prior market capitalization levels. As a result, on-chain economic throughput lags behind price expectations.

However, this signal does not imply structural failure. Weak NVT readings often appear during late correction phases, when speculative excess unwinds faster than fundamentals recover.

Therefore, the metric discourages premature bullish confidence. It also explains why rebounds struggle to sustain traction.

Without stronger transaction demand, valuation faces continued friction before balance can return.

Exchange reserves shrink as liquidity tightens

Bitcoin’s Exchange Reserve USD currently stands near $210.26 billion, down 2.67% over the observed period. This decline confirms continued contraction in sell-side liquidity.

Investors keep withdrawing coins from exchanges despite ongoing price weakness. This behavior contradicts panic-driven narratives. Instead, it reflects strategic repositioning.

However, shrinking reserves also thin order books. Therefore, smaller flows now trigger sharper price movements.

Brief demand spikes fuel quick rebounds, while modest selling causes abrupt drops. As a result, volatility remains elevated even as selling pressure eases.

Importantly, declining reserves suggest holders favor custody over liquidation, reinforcing a controlled adjustment phase.

Do persistent outflows signal absorption instead of fear?

Bitcoin’s Spot Netflows remain consistently negative, with recent daily outflows around $45.7 million.

Coins continue leaving exchanges without matching inflows. This pattern points toward absorption rather than distribution. Buyers appear willing to take custody, while sellers avoid aggressive liquidation.

However, demand lacks urgency. Therefore, accumulation unfolds quietly instead of explosively. This dynamic explains the grinding price action.

Outflows reduce available supply, yet muted inflows cap upside progress. Consequently, price drifts rather than trends decisively.

Historically, such flow structures preceded either volatility expansion or extended basing phases.

Conclusion

Together, these metrics describe controlled stress rather than broad capitulation. Profitability compresses, valuation efficiency weakens, and liquidity tightens, yet withdrawals persist.

Therefore, Bitcoin appears closer to stabilization than panic. However, thin liquidity keeps volatility elevated.

Direction now depends on whether network activity and demand recover enough to support valuation, or whether prolonged compression continues to test conviction.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin’s Realized Profit/Loss Ratio (90-day SMA) trended lower toward ~1.5, edging closer to neutral territory.
  • BTC’s MVRV Z-Score compressed to its lowest level since October 2022, indicating price traded closer to aggregate cost basis.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current trend of Bitcoin's Realized Profit/Loss Ratio (90-day SMA) and what level is it approaching?

ABitcoin's Realized Profit/Loss Ratio (90-day SMA) is trending lower and is approaching the neutral level of 1, currently near ~1.5.

QWhat does the compression of Bitcoin's MVRV Z-Score to its lowest level since October 2022 indicate?

AThe compression of Bitcoin's MVRV Z-Score confirms a deep reset in unrealized profitability, meaning the price is now trading closer to the aggregate cost basis, which tempers both greed and reactive selling.

QWhat does the sharp decline in Bitcoin's NVT Golden Cross signal about network valuation?

AThe sharp decline in Bitcoin's NVT Golden Cross to -1.4357 signals a weakening network valuation efficiency, indicating that transaction value no longer supports prior market capitalization levels and on-chain economic throughput lags behind price expectations.

QHow are Bitcoin's exchange reserves changing, and what does this suggest about investor behavior?

ABitcoin's exchange reserves have declined by 2.67% to approximately $210.26 billion, suggesting investors are strategically repositioning by withdrawing coins to custody rather than engaging in panic-driven liquidation, which thins liquidity and increases volatility.

QWhat is the overall conclusion from the metrics presented regarding the state of the Bitcoin market?

AThe overall conclusion is that the metrics describe a state of controlled stress rather than broad capitulation. Profitability is compressing and liquidity is tightening, but persistent outflows suggest the market is closer to stabilization than panic, though thin liquidity keeps volatility elevated.

Related Reads

From Return to Resignation: Chen Hang's 437 Days at DingTalk

The 437-Day Return and Departure of Chen Hang at DingTalk This article chronicles the 437-day period from March 31, 2025, to June 11, 2026, when Chen Hang (also known as "No Move") returned as CEO of DingTalk, the enterprise communication platform he originally founded, only to later step down. Chen Hang, the creator of DingTalk in 2015, was brought back by Alibaba in 2025 after the company acquired his subsequent startup, HHO. His return was driven by Alibaba's renewed focus on AI and DingTalk's strategic role as its key to-B AI application. However, his aggressive management style, marked by strict work policies like mandatory clock-ins and extended hours, quickly caused internal friction and was criticized as being at odds with Alibaba's culture. Despite the internal turmoil, Chen Hang drove significant product launches. In August 2025, he unveiled "AI DingTalk 1.0," featuring new products like the AI-native entry point "DingTalk ONE." By March 2026, he announced "Wukong," touted as the world's first enterprise-grade AI-native work platform, representing a fundamental rebuild of DingTalk's architecture. The turning point came in early June 2026. A detailed internal post criticizing DingTalk's work culture went viral, followed by a public critique from a former executive. This prompted an unprecedented public rebuke from the Alibaba Partners Committee, which stated such management was not aligned with company values. One day later, on June 11, Alibaba announced Chen Hang's departure. He was succeeded by Chen Yusen, a 32-year-old technical expert known for founding cybersecurity firm Changting Technology. While Chen Hang's tenure laid the technical foundation for DingTalk's AI transformation with "Wukong," his leadership style ultimately led to his replacement as the company seeks a new direction under younger leadership.

marsbit12m ago

From Return to Resignation: Chen Hang's 437 Days at DingTalk

marsbit12m ago

The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the Inevitable 'Antidote' for AI?

Decentralized AI 2026 Landscape: Why Blockchain is AI's Essential "Antidote" Centralized AI faces structural bottlenecks—expensive compute, concentrated control, unverifiable outputs, and difficult data access—that cannot be solved by capital or code alone. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The decentralized AI stack comprises: * **Infrastructure:** The foundation with compute, verifiable inference, distributed training, data/storage, and privacy/verification layers. Projects like Akash, Render, and Filecoin provide cheaper, decentralized alternatives for raw resources. * **Middleware:** The coordination layer for agent discovery, identity, and commerce. Key players include Bittensor (a network of specialized AI subnets), Virtuals (an agent economy OS), and frameworks providing agent identity and tooling. * **Applications & Services:** Dominated by Agentic Finance (AI agents executing on-chain actions based on natural language) and Agentic Payments (machine-to-machine transactions using blockchain as a settlement layer). Projects like Giza, Infinit Labs, and x402 are enabling these use cases. Key trends for 2026-2027 show AI demand outgrowing infrastructure, compute becoming an asset class, and tokenomics emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Venice demonstrate decentralized AI is evolving from a narrative into a new model for coordinating intelligence.

Foresight News32m ago

The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the Inevitable 'Antidote' for AI?

Foresight News32m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片