Bitcoin Reclaims $70K as ETF Investors Still Face Losses

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-05Last updated on 2026-03-05

Abstract

Bitcoin has reclaimed the $70,000 level, showing a recovery after weeks of volatile trading influenced by macro uncertainty and geopolitical tensions. Despite this rebound, data from CryptoQuant indicates that the average spot Bitcoin ETF investor is still at a loss, with an estimated cost basis of around $79,000. During the recent market correction, over $8.9 billion flowed out of the ETF ecosystem, with significant outflows from major funds like BlackRock's IBIT, which saw over 42,000 BTC withdrawn. These redemptions contributed to selling pressure, though the situation appears to be stabilizing as net drawdowns have slightly improved from -$8.9 billion to -$7.8 billion.

Bitcoin has successfully reclaimed the over $70,000 level, which shows a move that has kept selling pressure after the weeks of volatile trading. The recovery comes following the reaction of markets to macro uncertainty and geopolitical tensions.

However, the push over $70k provides a short-term improvement in momentum; the data still indicates that a prominent portion of market members are still under pressure. The CryptoQuant report reveals that the holders of spot Bitcoin ETFs that widely show institutional and retail demand via regulated investment vehicles are now placed below their estimated average realised price.

Estimated at around $79,000, this cost basis leaves the average ETF investor having a loss instead of the latest rebound. ETF flows can obscure internal reallocations between participations, and the calculation cannot completely capture every stated transaction within the funds.

However, it offers a useful estimation of the aggregate entry level for ETF capital. The analysis from Darkfrost underscores the scale of the latest pressure over spot Bitcoin ETFs. With Bitcoin trading below the $70,000 threshold during most of the correction, these funds listed the biggest drawdown since their all-time high in terms of invested value.

The Stabilizing Market

In terms of dollars, over $8.9 billion flowed out of the ETF ecosystem as investors suppressed exposure at the time of the downturn. The pressure was mainly seen in the biggest product in the market, iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) from BlackRock, which once had over 806,000 BTC at its peak and witnessed substantial withdrawals during the correction.

As per the data, more than 42,000 BTC exited the fund, indicating a clear wave of distribution as market sentiment deteriorated and price momentum weakened. These outflows showed a prominent source of selling pressure at the time of the decline, reinforcing the wider weakness over spot markets.

While big ETFs witnessed withdrawals, they mostly needed to redeem Bitcoin to meet redemptions, increasing supply in the market. Although the data indicates the situation may be stabilising.

The net drawdown from ETF holdings has amplified from around -$8.9 billion to about -$7.8 billion from the peak.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

KuCoin Tops CryptoQuant 2025 Exchange Transparency Rankings

TagsBitcoinBTCETF

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price level that Bitcoin has reclaimed according to the article?

ABitcoin has reclaimed the over $70,000 level.

QDespite the price rebound, what does the data indicate about the average spot Bitcoin ETF investor's position?

AThe data indicates that the average spot Bitcoin ETF investor is still at a loss, as their estimated average realized price is around $79,000, which is higher than the current price.

QWhich specific Bitcoin ETF product experienced the largest withdrawals during the market correction?

AThe iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) from BlackRock, the biggest product in the market, experienced substantial withdrawals, with over 42,000 BTC exiting the fund.

QWhat was the approximate total amount, in dollars, that flowed out of the ETF ecosystem during the downturn?

AOver $8.9 billion flowed out of the ETF ecosystem during the downturn.

QWhat is the trend in the net drawdown from ETF holdings, according to the latest data in the article?

AThe net drawdown from ETF holdings has shown signs of stabilizing, improving from around -$8.9 billion to about -$7.8 billion from the peak.

Related Reads

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit1h ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit1h ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit1h ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.4k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片