Bitcoin, Ethereum ETFs under pressure: Inside the $315mln February shake-up

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-22Last updated on 2026-02-22

Abstract

The final week of February saw significant pressure in the crypto ETF market, with Bitcoin ETFs experiencing $315.9 million in outflows, primarily driven by $303.5 million withdrawn from BlackRock’s IBIT. While Grayscale’s BTC Mini ETF attracted $36 million, the overall trend was negative, with outflows peaking at $165.8 million on February 19. A late-week rebound brought $88.1 million in net inflows to Bitcoin ETFs on February 20. Ethereum ETFs followed a similar volatile pattern, with large outflows of $130.1 million on February 19. In contrast, Solana ETFs saw steady inflows, reaching $6 million in a single day, indicating growing institutional interest. The market is increasingly segmented, with newer assets like Solana gaining traction as traditional giants face outflows.

The final week of February is here, and the crypto market is still under pressure. It continues to struggle, and this is clearly reflected in the latest ETF data.

Bitcoin ETFs saw $315.9 million in outflows this week, with $303.5 million coming from BlackRock’s IBIT. Meanwhile, Grayscale’s BTC Mini ETF attracted $36 million, offering lower-cost Bitcoin exposure for cautious investors.

Bitcoin ETF analysis

As per Farside Investors data, mid-February was a tough period for Bitcoin [BTC] ETFs, as big investors pulled money out for three days in a row.

The selling started on the 17th of February, when the market saw $104.9 million leave.

Most of this came from BlackRock’s IBIT, which alone lost $119.7 million. Grayscale’s BTC Mini ETF tried to balance this with $36 million in new money, but overall, investors were still heading for the exit.

The situation got worse over the next two days. On 18th February, outflows grew to $133.3 million.

Then on the 19th of February, they jumped again to $165.8 million. Once more, BlackRock led the selling, with $164.1 million leaving IBIT on that single day.

But things changed at the end of the week.

On the 20th of February, Bitcoin ETFs finally saw money come back in, with $88.1 million in net inflows. IBIT also reversed its trend and became the biggest contributor, adding $64.5 million.

The altcoin paradox

While Bitcoin ETFs were getting most of the attention, the altcoin ETF market was telling a very different story about what big investors currently prefer.

Ethereum followed a pattern similar to Bitcoin, but showed less weakness. It started the week well on the 17th of February, with $48.6 million in new inflows, mainly driven by BlackRock’s ETHA fund.

However, this positive momentum did not last long. By the 19th of February, Ethereum [ETH] ETFs saw a huge outflow of $130.1 million. Out of this, nearly $97 million came from BlackRock alone.

The situation ended on the 20th of February, when ETH ETFs recorded zero net flows, meaning no new money came in and none left.

Solana is an exception

In contrast, Solana became the top choice for institutional investors. Despite market caution, Solana ETFs have seen steady inflows since the 9th of February.

Between the 17th and 20th of February, Solana [SOL] kept attracting steady inflows. The highest point came on the 19th of February, when $6 million entered the ecosystem in a single day.

Bitwise led in total weekly volume with $11.7 million, while BlackRock’s BSOL fund supported the rally with consistent daily inflows.

At the same time, the Ripple [XRP] ETF market showed a very cautious approach. It started quietly and saw a small drop of $2.21 million on the 18th of February.

On 19th February, it briefly recovered with $4.05 million in inflows, but this did not last. By 20th February, activity slowed again and returned to almost zero.

What’s more?

Overall, the crypto ETF market is becoming more divided. Bitcoin and Ethereum are facing more pressure, while newer assets like Solana are gaining momentum.

This shift was clear on 17th February, when T. Rowe Price announced plans for an Active Crypto ETF that includes not just Bitcoin and Ethereum, but also Litecoin [LTC], Solana, and Cardano [ADA].

This move is important because it shows that big financial firms now see crypto as a serious investment space. Instead of treating it as a risky experiment, they are building strong products that include multiple digital assets.


Final Summary

  • Heavy outflows from BlackRock’s IBIT suggest that institutions are reducing risk during uncertain economic conditions.
  • Overall, the crypto ETF market is becoming more segmented, with different assets attracting different types of investors.

Related Questions

QWhat was the total amount of outflows from Bitcoin ETFs in the final week of February, and which fund contributed the majority of these outflows?

ABitcoin ETFs saw $315.9 million in outflows, with $303.5 million coming from BlackRock’s IBIT.

QHow did the flow of funds for Bitcoin ETFs change on February 20th, and what was BlackRock's IBIT's role in this change?

AOn February 20th, Bitcoin ETFs saw a reversal with $88.1 million in net inflows. BlackRock's IBIT was the biggest contributor, adding $64.5 million.

QWhich cryptocurrency ETF was highlighted as an exception, attracting steady inflows despite market caution, and which day saw its highest single-day inflow?

ASolana ETFs were the exception, attracting steady inflows. The highest single-day inflow was $6 million on February 19th.

QWhat does the announcement from T. Rowe Price about an Active Crypto ETF signal about the perception of cryptocurrency by large financial firms?

AIt signals that big financial firms now see crypto as a serious investment space and are building diversified products that include multiple digital assets, moving beyond treating it as a risky experiment.

QAccording to the final summary, what do the heavy outflows from BlackRock's IBIT suggest about institutional investor behavior?

AThe heavy outflows from BlackRock’s IBIT suggest that institutions are reducing risk during uncertain economic conditions.

Related Reads

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit2h ago

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit2h ago

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

DeepSeek-V4 has been released as a preview open-source model, featuring 1 million tokens of context length as a baseline capability—previously a premium feature locked behind enterprise paywalls by major overseas AI firms. The official announcement, however, openly acknowledges computational constraints, particularly limited service throughput for the high-end DeepSeek-V4-Pro version due to restricted high-end computing power. Rather than competing on pure scale, DeepSeek adopts a pragmatic approach that balances algorithmic innovation with hardware realities in China’s AI ecosystem. The V4-Pro model uses a highly sparse architecture with 1.6T total parameters but only activates 49B during inference. It performs strongly in agentic coding, knowledge-intensive tasks, and STEM reasoning, competing closely with top-tier closed models like Gemini Pro 3.1 and Claude Opus 4.6 in certain scenarios. A key strategic product is the Flash edition, with 284B total parameters but only 13B activated—making it cost-effective and accessible for mid- and low-tier hardware, including domestic AI chips from Huawei (Ascend), Cambricon, and Hygon. This design supports broader adoption across developers and SMEs while stimulating China's domestic semiconductor ecosystem. Despite facing talent outflow and intense competition in user traffic—with rivals like Doubao and Qianwen leading in monthly active users—DeepSeek has maintained technical momentum. The release also comes amid reports of a new funding round targeting a valuation exceeding $10 billion, potentially setting a new record in China’s LLM sector. Ultimately, DeepSeek-V4 represents a shift toward open yet realistic infrastructure development in the constrained compute landscape of Chinese AI, emphasizing engineering efficiency and domestic hardware compatibility over pure model scale.

marsbit3h ago

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片