Bitcoin Drops Below $86,000, But Is the Decline Just Beginning?

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-16Last updated on 2025-12-16

Abstract

Bitcoin fell below $86,000 over the weekend, extending a broader correction that has seen it decline more than 30% since its mid-October all-time high. The broader crypto market followed, with Ethereum, BNB, XRP, and SOL all posting losses. Bloomberg Intelligence senior commodity strategist Mike McGlone issued a stark warning in a new report, suggesting Bitcoin could potentially fall to $10,000 by 2026. His bearish outlook is not based on crypto-specific factors but is rooted in a macro view of an impending global economic inflection point from inflation to deflation. McGlone argues that as liquidity tightens and growth slows, risk assets like Bitcoin—which he views as highly speculative and correlated to market sentiment—will undergo significant repricing. He highlights three key factors: a mean reversion after extreme wealth creation, the declining Bitcoin-to-gold ratio (which has already dropped ~40% this year), and systemic oversupply of speculative crypto assets competing for limited risk budgets. This view contrasts with other institutional forecasts. While firms like Standard Chartered have also lowered their long-term Bitcoin price targets, they remain significantly higher than McGlone’s prediction. Analytics platform Glassnode notes that current market stress is reminiscent of early 2022, with unrealized losses nearing 10% of market cap, indicating a sensitive but not yet panic-driven sell-off phase. The article concludes that Bitcoin's trajectory is now deeply ti...

Over the past weekend, the crypto market did not see a sentiment recovery. After several days of narrow-range fluctuations, Bitcoin came under significant pressure from Sunday evening through Monday's U.S. stock market session, falling below the key $90,000 level and briefly touching around $86,000 at its lowest point. ETH dropped 3.4% to $2,980; BNB fell 2.1%; XRP declined 4%; SOL decreased 1.5%, retreating to around $126. Among the top ten cryptocurrencies by market cap, only TRX recorded a slight gain of less than 1%, while the rest were in a correction phase.

From a time perspective, this is not an isolated adjustment. Since hitting a new all-time high in mid-October, Bitcoin has accumulated a pullback of over 30%, with each rebound appearing brief and hesitant. Although ETF funds have not seen systematic outflows, marginal inflows have noticeably slowed, making it difficult to provide the "sentiment foundation" for the market as before. The crypto market is transitioning from one-sided optimism to a more complex and patience-testing phase.

Against this backdrop, Mike McGlone, Senior Commodity Strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence, released a latest report, placing Bitcoin's current trend within a broader macro and cyclical framework and presenting a highly unsettling judgment: Bitcoin is very likely to fall back to $10,000 by 2026. This is not alarmist but one potential outcome under a special "deflationary" cycle.

The reason this view has sparked significant controversy is not just because the figure itself is "too low," but because McGlone does not treat Bitcoin as an independent crypto asset. Instead, he re-examines it within the long-term coordinate system of "global risk assets—liquidity—wealth regression."

"Deflation After Inflation"? McGlone Focuses Not on Crypto but on the Cycle Inflection Point

To understand McGlone's judgment, the key lies not in how he views the crypto industry but in how he interprets the next phase of the macro environment.

In his latest views, McGlone repeatedly emphasizes a concept: Inflation/Deflation Inflection. In his view, global markets are near such a critical juncture. As inflation peaks in major economies and growth momentum slows, asset pricing logic is shifting from "fighting inflation" to coping with "deflation after inflation"—the phase of overall price declines after the inflation cycle ends. He writes: "Bitcoin's decline may resemble the stock market's reaction to Fed policy in 2007."

This is not the first time he has issued a bearish warning. As early as last November, he predicted Bitcoin would fall to the $50,000 mark.

He points out that by around 2026, commodity prices may fluctuate around a key pivot—the "inflation-deflation demarcation line" for core commodities like natural gas, corn, and copper could settle near $5. Among these, only copper, with its real industrial demand support, might still be above this pivot by the end of 2025.

McGlone notes: When liquidity recedes, the market will重新区分 "real demand" and "financialization premium." In his framework, Bitcoin is not "digital gold" but an asset highly correlated with risk appetite and speculative cycles. When the inflation narrative fades and macro liquidity tightens, Bitcoin tends to reflect this change earlier and more sharply.

In McGlone's view, his logic is not based on a single technical level but the叠加 of three long-term paths.

First, mean reversion after extreme wealth creation. McGlone has long emphasized that Bitcoin is one of the most extreme wealth amplifiers of the past decade-plus of宽松 monetary environment. When asset price growth长期 outstrips实体经济和 cash flow growth, the regression is often not gentle but violent. Historically, whether it was the 1929 U.S. stock market or the 2000 tech bubble, the commonality of the top phase was: the market repeatedly sought a "new paradigm" at highs, and the eventual adjustment幅度, in hindsight, often far exceeded the most pessimistic expectations at the time.

Second, the relative pricing relationship between Bitcoin and gold. McGlone特别强调 the Bitcoin/Gold ratio. This ratio was about 10x at the end of 2022, then expanded rapidly driven by the bull market, reaching over 30x in 2025. But this year, the ratio has fallen about 40%, dropping to around 21x. In his view, if deflationary pressures persist and gold remains firm due to safe-haven demand, it is not an激进假设 for the ratio to further return to its historical range.

Third, systemic issues in the supply environment of speculative assets. Although Bitcoin itself has a clear total supply cap, McGlone has多次指出 that what the market is truly trading is not Bitcoin's "uniqueness" but the risk premium of the entire crypto ecosystem. When millions of tokens, projects, and narratives compete for the same risk budget, the entire sector tends to be uniformly discounted in a deflationary cycle, and Bitcoin can hardly完全脱离 this revaluation process.

It should be noted that Mike McGlone is not a bull/bear spokesperson for the crypto market. As a Bloomberg senior commodity strategist, he has long studied the cyclical relationships between crude oil, precious metals, agricultural products, interest rates, and risk assets. His predictions are not always precisely timed, but their value lies in: he often raises structural contrarian questions when market sentiment is most consensus-driven.

In his latest remarks, he also主动复盘 his "errors," including underestimating the timing of gold breaking through $2,000 and misjudging the节奏 of U.S. Treasury yields and U.S. stocks. But in his view, these deviations repeatedly confirm one point: the market is most prone to illusions about trends before cyclical inflection points.

Other Voices: Divergence Is Widening

Of course, McGlone's judgment is not market consensus. In fact, mainstream institutions' attitudes show clear分化.

Traditional financial institutions like Standard Chartered have recently significantly lowered their medium-to-long-term Bitcoin target prices, reducing the 2025 expectation from $200,000 to about $100,000, and also adjusting the 2026 imagination from $300,000 to around $150,000. In other words, institutions no longer assume that ETFs and corporate allocations will provide marginal buying at any price range持续.

Glassnode's research points out that Bitcoin's current consolidation range between $80,000 and $90,000 has put pressure on the market, with intensity comparable to the end of January 2022. The market's relative unrealized loss has approached 10% of市值. Analysts further explain that such market dynamics reflect a state of "liquidity-constrained, sensitive to macro shocks," but it has not yet reached the level of atypical bear market彻底抛售 (panic selling).

More quantitative and structure-focused 10x Research offers a more direct conclusion: they believe Bitcoin has entered the early stages of a bear market, with on-chain indicators, fund flows, and market structure all indicating that the downward cycle has not yet reached its end.

From a broader time dimension, the uncertainty surrounding Bitcoin is no longer just an issue for the crypto market itself but is firmly embedded in the global macro cycle. The coming week is seen by many strategists as the most critical macro window period of the year-end—the European Central Bank, Bank of England, and Bank of Japan will announce interest rate decisions successively, while the U.S. will迎来 a series of delayed employment and inflation data, providing a belated "reality check" for the market.

The Fed's FOMC meeting on December 10 had already sent an unusual signal: not only did it cut rates by 25 basis points, but there were also three dissenting votes, and Powell直言 that job growth in previous months might have been overestimated. This week's密集 macro data will reshape the market's core expectations for 2026—whether the Fed can continue to cut rates or will have to press pause for a longer period. For risk assets, this answer may be more important than any single asset's bull-bear debate.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to Bloomberg Intelligence's Mike McGlone, what is the potential price target for Bitcoin in 2026?

AMike McGlone's report suggests that Bitcoin could potentially fall back to $10,000 by 2026.

QWhat major macroeconomic concept does Mike McGlone use to frame his bearish outlook for Bitcoin?

AMcGlone frames his outlook using the concept of an 'Inflation / Deflation Inflection' point, where the global market is transitioning from an inflationary period to a deflationary one.

QWhich key ratio does McGlone highlight as an indicator of Bitcoin's relative valuation, and what has been its recent trend?

AMcGlone highlights the Bitcoin/Gold ratio. This ratio expanded to over 30x during the bull market but has since declined by about 40% to around 21x.

QWhat was the revised year-end 2025 Bitcoin price forecast from Standard Chartered bank?

AStandard Chartered revised its Bitcoin forecast for the end of 2025 down from $200,000 to approximately $100,000.

QWhat critical macroeconomic events are expected in the upcoming week that could significantly impact risk assets like Bitcoin?

AThe upcoming week features key events including interest rate decisions from the European Central Bank, the Bank of England, and the Bank of Japan, as well as delayed U.S. employment and inflation data.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报18m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报18m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News35m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News35m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

972 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片