Bank Of England To Ease ‘Overly Conservative’ Stablecoin Rules After Industry Backlash – Report

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-15Last updated on 2026-05-15

Abstract

The Bank of England (BoE) plans to relax its proposed "overly conservative" regulations for stablecoins after facing criticism from the crypto industry and lawmakers. Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden acknowledged the initial proposals, including temporary ownership caps and a rule requiring stablecoin issuers to hold 40% of reserves as non-interest-bearing deposits at the central bank, may be too restrictive and operationally cumbersome. The industry argued the caps would be impractical and harm the UK's competitiveness. Breeden stated the BoE is now exploring alternative ways to ensure the safety of this new form of money while allowing stablecoins to succeed and benefit users.

The Bank of England (BoE) is set to water down its planned stablecoin rules and is exploring alternative solutions to mitigate potential risks, following pressure from the local crypto industry and multiple lawmakers about the proposed restrictions.

BoE Calls Stablecoin Plans ‘Overly Conservative’

On Thursday, the Bank of England’s Deputy Governor for financial stability, Sarah Breeden, revealed that the central bank is preparing to ease its controversial regulatory plans for stablecoins.

In an interview with Financial Times (FT), Breeden admitted that the regulator’s proposal may have been “overly conservative” and that the financial regulator was “looking very hard” at potential solutions.

The BoE proposed a temporary cap on stablecoin ownership in a November consultation paper to “mitigate financial stability risks stemming from large and rapid outflows of deposits from the banking sector.”

The restriction aimed to set holding limits of £10,000 to £20,000 for individuals and £10 million for businesses, resembling its proposed approach to the digital pound, which also sought to address financial stability risks.

Additionally, the central bank proposed that systemic stablecoin issuers hold at least 40% of reserves backing the token as unremunerated deposits at the central bank to ensure “robust redemption and public confidence, even under stress.”

In March, Breeden had already signaled openness to reviewing BoE’s proposals during a meeting with the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee. At the time, she recognized the cap’s technical difficulties but argued that they “are there to support an orderly transition as the shape of the system changes.”

Meanwhile, Breeden told FT that the 60:40 asset allocation requirement was “based on experience of potential liquidity stress,” particularly the size of deposits withdrawn from Silicon Valley Bank in 2023 and other recent crises.

Central Bank To Rethink Approach

Notably, crypto industry and payment groups in the UK strongly criticized the financial regulator’s proposal, arguing that it would be detrimental to the pound and put the UK at a disadvantage relative to the US and the European Union (EU).

Simon Jennings, executive director of the UK Cryptoasset Business Council trade body, said that “limits simply don’t work in practice,” explaining that enforcing caps would require a “costly, complex new system, such as digital IDs or constant co-ordination between wallets.”

Similarly, a coalition of UK lawmakers opposed the BoE’s policies in December, claiming that it could undermine the government’s efforts to position the UK as a leading nation in the digital assets industry.

According to the Thursday report, Breeden affirmed that “what we have heard from industry is that the way we have proposed to implement limits is cumbersome operationally for a temporary measure,” and added that the industry also seems to prefer to hold more interest-earning assets, “as that goes to their bottom line.”

Now, the central bank is “genuinely open to thinking whether there are other ways of achieving our objective” of creating a regime in which stablecoins can succeed and deliver benefits to users. “But it is money and we want to make sure that this new form of money is safe,” she concluded.

The total crypto market capitalization is at $2.64 trillion in the one-week chart. Source: TOTAL on TradingView

Related Questions

QWhy is the Bank of England reconsidering its proposed stablecoin rules?

AThe Bank of England is reconsidering its proposed stablecoin rules due to pressure and criticism from the local crypto industry and multiple lawmakers, who argued the plans were 'overly conservative' and could harm the UK's competitive position in the digital assets sector.

QWhat were the key restrictions the Bank of England initially proposed for stablecoins in November?

AIn November, the Bank of England proposed a temporary cap on stablecoin holdings—£10,000 to £20,000 for individuals and £10 million for businesses. It also suggested that systemic stablecoin issuers hold at least 40% of their reserves as unremunerated deposits at the central bank.

QWhat criticism did the UK crypto industry raise against the BoE's proposed holding limits?

AThe UK crypto industry, represented by figures like Simon Jennings of the UK Cryptoasset Business Council, argued that the holding limits are impractical. They stated enforcement would require a costly and complex new system, such as digital IDs or constant coordination between wallets.

QAccording to Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden, what was the reasoning behind the 60:40 asset allocation requirement for reserves?

ADeputy Governor Sarah Breeden stated that the 60:40 asset allocation requirement for stablecoin reserves was based on lessons from potential liquidity stress, particularly referencing the scale of deposit withdrawals from Silicon Valley Bank in 2023 and other recent financial crises.

QWhat is the Bank of England's stated objective while rethinking its stablecoin regulatory approach?

AThe Bank of England's stated objective is to create a regulatory regime where stablecoins can succeed and deliver benefits to users while ensuring that this new form of money is safe and secure for the public.

Related Reads

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit6m ago

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit6m ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手6m ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手6m ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit2h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit2h ago

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

The article discusses the immense popularity of the "2x Long SK Hynix ETF" (07709.HK) in Hong Kong, which became the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF by May 2026. Launched in October 2025, the ETF's net value soared over 1000% in seven months, significantly outperforming the 324% gain of SK Hynix's underlying stock, driven by the AI boom and a critical shift in industry demand from computing power to memory. It highlights the mechanics and risks of daily-rebalanced leveraged ETFs. In a smooth bullish market, they generate amplified returns, but during volatile periods—exemplified by market swings during geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz in March-April 2026—they suffer severe "volatility decay," where choppy price action can cause losses far exceeding twice the drop of the underlying asset. The piece frames SK Hynix, as NVIDIA's primary HBM supplier, within the classic cycle of the memory chip industry—a commoditized sector prone to boom-and-bust cycles of shortage, price hikes, overcapacity, and crashes. While current AI-driven demand and high margins (Q1 2026毛利率~79%) create a "super cycle," the article questions its sustainability. It warns that extreme profits will inevitably tempt competitors like Samsung and Micron to ramp up HBM production, potentially eroding scarcity. Furthermore, the entire narrative remains tethered to the massive AI capital expenditure of tech giants. In conclusion, the ETF's trajectory symbolizes the accelerated, all-in nature of the current AI revolution, where timeframes are compressed and market moves are extreme. However, it also underscores that while industry trends define ultimate returns, macro-geopolitical risks dictate the volatile and uncertain path to get there.

marsbit2h ago

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BANK

Bank AI: A Revolutionary Step in the Future of Banking Introduction In an era marked by rapid advancements in technology, Bank AI stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and banking services. This innovative project seeks to redefine the financial landscape, enhancing operational efficiency, security measures, and customer experiences through the power of AI. As we embark on this exploration of Bank AI, we will delve into what the project entails, its operational dynamics, its historical context, and significant milestones. What is Bank AI? At its core, Bank AI represents a transformative initiative aimed at integrating artificial intelligence into various banking operations. This project harnesses the capabilities of AI to automate processes, improve risk management protocols, and enhance customer interaction through personalised services. The primary objectives of Bank AI include: Automation of Banking Functions: By leveraging AI technologies, Bank AI aims to automate routine tasks, reducing the burden on human resources and enhancing efficiency. Enhanced Risk Management: The project utilises AI algorithms to predict and identify risks, thereby fortifying security measures against fraud and other threats. Personalisation of Banking Services: Bank AI focuses on offering tailored financial products and services by analysing customer data and behaviours. Improving Customer Experience: The implementation of AI-driven solutions, such as chatbots and virtual assistants, aims to provide users with more human-like interactions, revolutionising the way customers engage with banks. With these goals, Bank AI positions itself as a crucial player in rendering banking more efficient, secure, and user-centric. Who is the Creator of Bank AI? Details regarding the creator of Bank AI remain unknown. As such, no specific individual or organisation has been identified in the available information. The anonymity surrounding the project's inception raises questions but does not detract from its ambitious vision and objectives. Who are the Investors of Bank AI? Similar to the project's creator, specific information regarding the investors or supporting organisations of Bank AI has not been disclosed. Without this information, it is challenging to outline the financial backing and institutional support that might be propelling the project forward. Nevertheless, the importance of having a robust investment foundation is pivotal for sustaining development in such an innovative field. How Does Bank AI Work? Bank AI operates on several innovative fronts, focusing on unique factors that differentiate it from traditional banking frameworks. Below are key operational features: Automation: By applying machine learning algorithms, Bank AI automates various manual processes within banks. This results in reduced operational costs and allows human workers to redirect their efforts towards more strategic activities. Advanced Risk Management: The integration of AI into risk management practices equips banks with tools to accurately predict potential threats such as fraud, ensuring that customer information and assets remain secure. Tailored Financial Recommendations: Through continuous learning from customer interactions, the AI systems develop a nuanced understanding of user needs, enabling them to offer tailored advice on financial decisions. Enhanced Customer Interactions: Utilizing chatbots and virtual assistants powered by AI, Bank AI enables a more engaging customer experience, allowing users to have their queries resolved quickly, thus reducing wait times and improving satisfaction levels. Together, these operational features position Bank AI as a pioneer in the banking sector, establishing new benchmarks for service delivery and operational excellence. Timeline of Bank AI Understanding the trajectory of Bank AI requires a look at its historical context. Below is a timeline highlighting important milestones and developments: Early 2010s: The conceptualisation of AI integration into banking services began to gain attention as banking institutions recognised the potential benefits. 2018: A marked increase in the implementation of AI technologies occurred when banks started using AI tools like chatbots for basic customer service and risk management systems for improved security handling. 2023: The sophistication of AI continued to advance, with generative AI being introduced for more complex tasks such as document processing and real-time investment analysis. This year marked a significant leap in the capabilities afforded to banks by AI technology. 2024-Current Status: As of this year, Bank AI is on an upward trajectory, with ongoing research and developments poised to further enhance capabilities in banking operations. Continued exploration of AI applications hints at exciting developments yet to come. Key Points About Bank AI Integration of AI in Banking: Bank AI focuses on adopting artificial intelligence to streamline banking processes and improve user experiences. Automation and Risk Management Focus: The project strongly emphasises these areas, aiming to shift the burden of routine tasks while enhancing security frameworks through predictive analytics. Personalised Banking Solutions: By harnessing customer data, Bank AI enables tailored banking services that cater to individual user needs. Commitment to Development: Bank AI remains committed to ongoing research and development efforts, ensuring its adaptability and ongoing relevance as technology continues to evolve. Conclusion In summary, Bank AI exemplifies a crucial step forward in the banking industry, leveraging artificial intelligence to reshape operational paradigms, enhance security, and promote customer satisfaction. Despite gaps in information surrounding the creator and investors, the clear objectives and functional mechanisms of Bank AI provide a strong foundation for its ongoing evolution. As AI technology continues to advance and merge with the banking sector, Bank AI is well-positioned to significantly impact the future of financial services, enhancing the way we understand and interact with banking.

152 Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.06Updated 2024.12.03

What is $BANK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BANK (BANK) are presented below.

活动图片