Avalanche: Is a 30% drop next as AVAX fails at KEY support?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-24Last updated on 2026-02-24

Abstract

AVAX is at risk of a significant downturn, having failed to reclaim its crucial $8.50 support level. Trading volume surged 18% to $265 million, indicating strengthening bearish momentum. Analysts warn that if the price closes below $8.50, a sharp 30% decline to $5.69 or even $6.55 is possible. The Average Directional Index (ADX) reading of 36.93 confirms strong directional momentum for this downward trend. Derivative data reveals traders are heavily betting against AVAX, with $3.46 million in short-leveraged positions targeting a drop to $8.04, suggesting widespread belief that the price will not surpass $8.59 soon.

Price action and derivative data suggest additional downside may be ahead. According to CoinMarketCap, AVAX trading volume surged over 18% to $265 million.

Rising volume during a price decline typically reflects strengthening bearish momentum, indicating that traders and investors are aligning with the downward trend.

A possible 30% decline for AVAX

Looking at the weekly chart, it appears that AVAX has been struggling to reclaim its key support level of $8.50 after attempting to move back above it.

On the 2nd of February 2025, the asset fell below this level but recovered after strong buying activity. However, this time it has failed to do so.

Based on the current price action, if AVAX’s weekly and daily candles close below the key level of $8.50, it could experience a sharp decline of 30% and potentially reach the $5.69 level. However, this bearish outlook would be invalidated if the price moves back above the $8.50 level.

At press time, the Average Directional Index (ADX), an indicator that measures the strength of a trend, has reached 36.93, well above the key threshold of 25. This indicated that AVAX has strong directional momentum.

Amid this decline and bearish price action, a well-followed crypto analyst shared a post along with a video stating that AVAX has broken down from a bearish flag pattern and is poised to hit the $6.55 level in the coming days.

Traders eyes on short-leveraged positions

Besides the price action and predictions, another factor currently strengthening this bearish view is the derivative analytics tool CoinGlass.

The latest AVAX exchange liquidation map shows that intraday traders are heavily targeting two key levels: $8.04 on the downside and $8.59 on the upside. These levels hold the highest concentration of positions.

In addition, the data reveals that traders have built $2.19 million in long‐leveraged positions and $3.46 million in short‐leveraged positions. Together, this positioning highlights the strong bets being placed around these price points.

These positions indicate that intraday traders are strongly following the prevailing market trend and largely believe that the AVAX price is unlikely to cross the $8.59 level anytime soon.


Final Summary

  • AVAX appears to be failing to hold its key support level of $8.50.
  • Intraday traders are strongly betting on short positions, while experts suggest that AVAX is poised to hit the $6.55 level.

Related Questions

QWhat is the key support level that AVAX is struggling to reclaim according to the article?

AThe key support level that AVAX is struggling to reclaim is $8.50.

QWhat potential price decline is predicted if AVAX closes below the $8.50 level?

AA sharp decline of 30% to the $5.69 level is predicted if AVAX closes below the $8.50 level.

QWhat does the Average Directional Index (ADX) value of 36.93 indicate about AVAX's trend?

AAn ADX value of 36.93, which is well above the key threshold of 25, indicates that AVAX has strong directional momentum.

QAccording to the liquidation map data, what are the two key price levels that intraday traders are heavily targeting?

AIntraday traders are heavily targeting the $8.04 level on the downside and the $8.59 level on the upside.

QWhat is the total value of short-leveraged positions that traders have built, as mentioned in the article?

ATraders have built $3.46 million in short-leveraged positions.

Related Reads

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit41m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit41m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手1h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit1h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit1h ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit2h ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy AVAX

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Avalanche (AVAX) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Avalanche (AVAX) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Avalanche (AVAX)After purchasing your Avalanche (AVAX), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Avalanche (AVAX)Easily trade Avalanche (AVAX) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

8.1k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy AVAX

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AVAX (AVAX) are presented below.

活动图片