Apple Removes Fake DefiLlama App After Several Months of Complaints

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-16Last updated on 2026-08-16

Abstract

Apple removed a fake app impersonating the analytics platform DefiLlama from the App Store after months of complaints from the service's founder, 0xngmi. He stated that Apple had ignored his reports about trademark infringement and requests to remove the software. To finally prove the app was fraudulent, 0xngmi resorted to downloading it himself, depositing a small amount of funds, and allowing the hackers to steal it, demonstrating the scam to Apple. He called this action "crazy" but necessary to protect users from the fake app, which closely resembled a basic version of DefiLlama and was used to steal seed phrases from victims. 0xngmi publicized the incident to warn other crypto teams, hoping they would avoid similar wasted effort. As a result of this situation, the DefiLlama team has postponed the launch of their official app, deciding to wait until all fraudulent versions disappear to prevent users from accidentally downloading a fake.

Updated: 2026-08-15

Apple has removed a fake app from the App Store that was impersonating the analytics platform DefiLlama. The founder of the service, 0xngmi, stated that the "Apple" company had ignored his complaints about trademark infringement and his demands to remove the software from the app store for several months. As a result, he was forced to take a desperate step.

0xngmi reported that he himself downloaded the fake app from the App Store, deposited a small amount into a wallet, and allowed the hackers to steal the funds. Only this way could he prove to Apple that it was a fraud.

I understand this is crazy. I did it to protect users from obviously fake apps, — he wrote.

The DefiLlama founder also added that he is making this case public so that other crypto teams "don't waste time like we did."

According to 0xngmi, the fake app closely resembled a basic version of DefiLlama, which the scammers used to steal seed phrases from potential victims.

Due to the situation with the counterfeit software, the DefiLlama team decided to postpone the launch of the genuine service. The developers decided to wait until all the hacker versions disappear so that no user mistakenly downloads a fake one.

end-content

Related Questions

QWhat action did Apple take regarding a fake application, and why?

AApple removed a fake application from the App Store that was impersonating the analytical platform DefiLlama.

QWho reported the issue of the fake app to Apple, and what was their claim?

AThe founder of the service, 0xngmi, reported the issue, claiming that Apple had ignored his complaints about trademark violations for several months.

QWhat drastic step did the founder of DefiLlama take to prove the app was fraudulent?

AHe downloaded the fake app himself, funded a wallet with a small amount, and allowed the hackers to steal the funds to prove to Apple that it was a scam.

QWhat was the main purpose of the fake DefiLlama app according to the article?

AThe fake app was used by scammers to steal seed phrases from potential victims.

QHow did the situation with the fake app affect the launch plans of the real DefiLlama service?

AThe DefiLlama team decided to delay the launch of their genuine service until all fraudulent versions disappeared, to prevent users from accidentally downloading a fake one.

Related Reads

Singapore Bets on AI Advantages as Hong Kong Lures Fund Managers with Tax Cuts

Singapore is leveraging its access to cutting-edge AI technology from both the US and China, including models from firms like Moonshot and DeepSeek, to attract and retain investment managers. This strategy positions the city-state as a neutral hub amidst US-China tech competition. In contrast, Hong Kong's primary draw is a proposed tax exemption scheme for fund managers, family offices, and private equity specialists, though proprietary trading firms like Jane Street are currently excluded. While Hong Kong's tax incentives could lower costs, industry experts note that Singapore's superior access to advanced AI tools is a critical long-term advantage, especially for quantitative funds reliant on complex algorithms. This technological gap is reportedly prompting some Hong Kong-based quant funds to consider moving key research operations to Singapore. The competition highlights how financial centers are increasingly competing through both fiscal policy and technology access, with firms weighing lower taxes against superior tech infrastructure.

cryptonews.ru15m ago

Singapore Bets on AI Advantages as Hong Kong Lures Fund Managers with Tax Cuts

cryptonews.ru15m ago

Bitcoin ETFs Lost Nearly $390 Million Over the Week, While SOL ETFs Attracted New Capital

Between August 10 and 14, 2026, the US spot Bitcoin ETF sector experienced a significant net outflow of $389.71 million, according to SoSoValue data. Outflows were recorded on four of the five trading days, primarily affecting major funds like Fidelity's FBTC ($153.23M outflow) and BlackRock's IBIT ($78.96M outflow). While Grayscale's BTC and Morgan Stanley's MSBT saw inflows, most Bitcoin ETFs ended the week with outflows or neutral flows. The spot Ethereum ETF sector also saw a net outflow of $2.26 million for the week, led by BlackRock's ETHA. In contrast, several altcoin-based ETFs attracted new capital. SOL-ETFs led with an inflow of $10.26 million, followed by funds tied to HYPE, XRP, LINK, and HBAR. DOGE-ETFs were an exception with a minor outflow. Activity in the Hong Kong market remained minimal. This follows a week where over $1 billion flowed into various crypto funds.

cryptonews.ru17m ago

Bitcoin ETFs Lost Nearly $390 Million Over the Week, While SOL ETFs Attracted New Capital

cryptonews.ru17m ago

Crypto Adoption in the EU Stalls: ECB Finds Only 0.2% of Online Payments Use It

The European Central Bank (ECB)'s latest survey on cash use by eurozone companies reveals a very low adoption rate for cryptocurrencies in the region. The survey of 8,205 firms found cash remains the most widely accepted payment method at physical points of sale (92%), followed by cards (88%). Mobile payments grew significantly from 36% in 2024 to 68% in 2026. However, digital assets have minimal penetration: only 0.2% of businesses accept crypto or stablecoins for online purchases, rising to just 1% at physical stores. This is far below adoption levels in emerging markets. The ECB emphasized the need to prevent growing payment automation from undermining cash's viability. Despite acknowledging crypto's potential benefits like reduced intermediaries and fees, financial institutions have been slow to implement systems. Consequently, European payment operators have yet to capitalize on the regulatory clarity provided by the full implementation of the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework. An Elliptic policy head noted MiCA now allows operators to confidently develop compliant crypto payment solutions for the European market.

cryptonews.ru17m ago

Crypto Adoption in the EU Stalls: ECB Finds Only 0.2% of Online Payments Use It

cryptonews.ru17m ago

Media: Anthropic Aims for Revenue Up to $200 Billion by 2028 Ahead of IPO

Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude, is reportedly projecting its revenue could reach between $190 billion and $200 billion by 2028, according to sources cited by Reuters. This forecast, significantly higher than its reported $47 billion annual run-rate in May 2026, is being used by investors and bankers to value the company ahead of a potential IPO. Anthropic has confidentially filed with the SEC, with listing details dependent on market conditions and regulatory approval. The valuation reportedly applies a revenue multiple (EV/Revenue) to these future 2028 figures, an approach common for high-growth tech firms but unusual for a forecast two years ahead of an IPO. This reflects confidence in Anthropic's rapid scaling; its annual run-rate grew tenfold yearly for three years leading into 2026, jumping from ~$9B in late 2025 to over $47B by May 2026. Investors are betting the company's massive spending on GPUs, model training, and infrastructure will eventually outpace costs, leading to expanding margins. Public companies like Palantir, Cloudflare, and SpaceX, valued at high multiples of their forward revenue, serve as benchmarks. While this forward-looking method has precedents, some analysts question the sustainability of such valuations and the actual productivity gains from AI. Despite these concerns, earlier reports suggested Anthropic could be valued at over $1 trillion for its IPO.

cryptonews.ru19m ago

Media: Anthropic Aims for Revenue Up to $200 Billion by 2028 Ahead of IPO

cryptonews.ru19m ago

Open Blockchain Business: Who Gets the Fees and Why a Foundation is Needed

Business of Open Blockchain: Who Gets the Fees and Why a Foundation is Needed In public blockchains, user transaction fees do not simply become "revenue" for a single entity. The flow of money is complex and protocol-dependent. In Ethereum, fees consist of a base fee (burned, permanently removing ETH from circulation) and a priority tip (paid to the validator). In Solana, half the base fee is burned and half goes to the validator, while priority fees go entirely to validators. Thus, "fees" are not synonymous with "project revenue"; they may go to network operators or be destroyed. Foundations like the Ethereum Foundation do not take a cut of user fees. They are funded by their own treasuries, which can generate income (e.g., from staking rewards) and finance ecosystem development, research, and security. Their role is to fund public goods that are hard to monetize directly. Developers of open-source blockchain code can monetize through services, not the code itself. For example, Optimism provides its technology freely but sells enterprise support and managed services (OP Enterprise). Additionally, networks built on Optimism's tech, like Coinbase's Base, share a portion of their revenue with the Optimism ecosystem via agreements, creating an economic link. Token holders do not automatically receive fees as dividends. In Optimism, a portion of protocol revenue is now used to buy back and treasury-lock OP tokens, creating an indirect link between network usage and token economics. In Ethereum, fee burning reduces ETH supply but doesn't distribute funds to all holders; stakers and validators receive direct rewards. For evaluation, analysts should look beyond total fee figures. Key questions are: Who paid and for what? Where did the money go (to validators, operators, treasury, or burning)? What were the recipient's costs? Is there a mechanism linking this income to the token? The same fee amount impacts different blockchain economies in vastly different ways depending on these factors.

cryptonews.ru20m ago

Open Blockchain Business: Who Gets the Fees and Why a Foundation is Needed

cryptonews.ru20m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片