All about Aave Labs’ ‘token-centric’ plan to direct 100% revenue to DAO

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-14Last updated on 2026-02-14

Abstract

Aave Labs has proposed a "token-centric" framework to direct 100% of revenue from all Aave-branded products, including Aave.com and its mobile app, to the Aave DAO. In return, it requested $50 million from the DAO to fund development. CEO Stani Kulechov stated this model positions Aave for long-term growth as DeFi and TradFi converge. However, the proposal faced criticism from the DAO, with member Marc Zeller calling it a potential "extraction" of funds and demanding further audits and clarifications. The ongoing governance dispute, which previously caused significant token volatility, remains unresolved despite a temporary ceasefire in January.

The Aave Labs-DAO ceasefire in January is being tested. Aave Labs, one of the ecosystem service providers (SPs), announced an “Aave will win” framework to direct 100% product revenue to the DAO.

According to the proposal, revenue generated from all Aave-branded products, including Aave.com, Aave mobile app, Aave Card, and Aave Horizon (a tokenization platform), amongst others, will be channeled to the DAO.

For his part, Aave Labs CEO and founder Stani Kulechov said,

“The framework formalizes Aave Labs’ role as a long-term contributor to the Aave DAO under a token-centric model, with 100% of product revenue directed to the DAO.”

As DeFi and TradFi merge, Kulechov added that “this framework positions Aave to capture major growth markets and win over the next decade.”

In return, Aave Labs has requested $50 million, including 75,000 AAVE coins, from the DAO to fund development of these products. It argued that the revenue streams it currently relies on to do the work would be directed to the DAO.

Additionally, the SP proposed the formation of a Foundation to handle and manage Aave brands, arguing that the DAO isn’t a legal entity capable of undertaking such a responsibility.

DAO slams Aave Labs proposal as ‘extraction’

For the unfamiliar, the DAO is the collective governing entity representing tokenholders and tasked with directing and funding ecosystem developments carried out by SPs.

The governance spat between the two entities spiraled in late 2025 following accusations that Aave Labs stole DAO revenues for personal use. Additionally, the DAO demanded control over all Aave brands, claiming that Aave Labs had sidestepped it.

At that time, AAVE token’s price dropped from $200 to nearly $140, wiping significant market value as the crisis deepened. However, relief came after a ceasefire in January, when Aave Labs promised a proposal aligned with token holders.

Alas, the DAO, led by vocal member Marc Zeller, remains unhappy with Aave Labs’ demands and certain aspects of the proposal.

In a statement, Zeller said the proposal was a win for the DAO but retorted,

“Aave Labs is back with a $50M ‘solution’, presented as ‘for the good of the DAO’, after zero prior coordination with delegates or service providers. At this point, the fox controls the henhouse, and the incentive is clearly to maximize extraction.”

He asked for further clarification and an audit on Aave Labs’ income streams to verify the “100% revenue” commitment.

In other words, the governance issue may still be far from being resolved. For its part, AAVE surged by about 7% after the update. However, if the governance crisis escalates again, it could drop to $79 or lower.


Final Thoughts

  • Aave Labs has agreed to direct 100% of product revenue from Aave-related brands back to the DAO.
  • However, the DAO disagreed with Aave Labs’ $50 million demand, signaling that the governance crisis may continue.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main proposal announced by Aave Labs regarding revenue distribution?

AAave Labs announced a 'token-centric' framework to direct 100% of the product revenue from all Aave-branded products to the Aave DAO.

QWhat funding has Aave Labs requested from the DAO in return for directing all revenue?

AAave Labs has requested $50 million, including 75,000 AAVE coins, from the DAO to fund the development of its products.

QWhy did Marc Zeller criticize Aave Labs' proposal?

AMarc Zeller criticized the proposal as an 'extraction' and expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of prior coordination with delegates or service providers, calling it a move to maximize extraction rather than benefit the DAO.

QWhat was the impact of the previous governance crisis on the AAVE token price?

ADuring the previous governance crisis in late 2025, the price of AAVE dropped from $200 to nearly $140, wiping out significant market value.

QWhat additional structure did Aave Labs propose to handle Aave brands, and why?

AAave Labs proposed the formation of a Foundation to handle and manage Aave brands, arguing that the DAO is not a legal entity capable of undertaking such responsibilities.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit2m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit2m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit17m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit17m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy DAO

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing DAO Maker (DAO) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy DAO Maker (DAO) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your DAO Maker (DAO)After purchasing your DAO Maker (DAO), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade DAO Maker (DAO)Easily trade DAO Maker (DAO) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

2.7k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy DAO

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of DAO (DAO) are presented below.

活动图片