Alameda Triggers $17M Solana Unstaking As Creditor Liquidations Resume

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-13Last updated on 2026-03-13

Abstract

Alameda Research has unstaked approximately $17 million worth of SOL and moved the tokens to its bankruptcy-controlled accounts, as part of ongoing efforts to liquidate assets and distribute funds to creditors. The firm, which collapsed alongside FTX in November 2022, still holds around $321 million in SOL, making it one of the largest known holders tied to the FTX estate. These movements are closely monitored due to the potential market impact, as periodic distributions could introduce selling pressure. Despite this, Solana maintains strong on-chain activity and developer engagement, which continue to support long-term interest in the asset.

Solana is drawing renewed market attention after on-chain data revealed fresh activity from Alameda Research wallets. According to blockchain analytics platform Arkham, Alameda recently unstaked approximately $17 million worth of SOL and transferred the tokens to its bankruptcy-controlled accounts. These movements are part of the firm’s ongoing asset management process, as funds recovered from the estate are periodically redistributed to creditors.

Alameda Research was once one of the most influential trading firms in the cryptocurrency industry. Founded by Sam Bankman-Fried, the company operated as a quantitative trading desk closely tied to the FTX cryptocurrency exchange. Alameda played a major role in providing liquidity across digital asset markets and maintained large positions in several major cryptocurrencies, including Solana.

However, the firm collapsed in November 2022 following the dramatic failure of FTX. Investigations revealed that billions of dollars in customer funds had been misused and transferred between the exchange and Alameda, triggering a liquidity crisis that quickly spiraled into one of the largest bankruptcies in crypto history.

Since then, Alameda’s remaining digital assets have been gradually managed through court-supervised bankruptcy proceedings. The periodic unstaking and distribution of SOL tokens reflects the ongoing effort to recover value for creditors while liquidating portions of the estate’s remaining cryptocurrency holdings.

Alameda’s Remaining Solana Holdings Continue to Draw Market Attention

Despite the recent $17 million unstaking event, Alameda Research still holds a substantial amount of Solana in its on-chain wallets. Current blockchain data indicates that the bankrupt trading firm retains roughly $321 million worth of SOL, making it one of the largest known holders of the asset tied to the FTX estate. Because these tokens remain under bankruptcy management, market participants closely monitor any movements from these wallets.

Alameda Research Solana holdings | Source: Arkham

The presence of such a large balance introduces a persistent element of potential supply overhang. As bankruptcy administrators continue distributing assets to creditors, portions of these holdings may periodically enter the market. This process does not necessarily translate into immediate selling pressure, but it can influence trader sentiment because investors often anticipate that distributed tokens could eventually be liquidated.

At the same time, Solana’s broader market structure reflects the cautious environment affecting the cryptocurrency sector. Like many large-cap altcoins, SOL has been trading in a consolidation phase following periods of volatility across the digital asset market. Liquidity remains selective, and investors are increasingly focused on assets with strong ecosystem activity and sustained network usage.

For Solana, this environment creates a mixed dynamic. While ongoing creditor distributions represent a potential supply factor, the network continues to maintain high on-chain activity and developer engagement, which remain key drivers supporting long-term interest in the asset.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the value of SOL tokens unstaked by Alameda Research according to the article?

AAlameda Research unstaked approximately $17 million worth of SOL tokens.

QWhy is Alameda Research managing and distributing its digital assets?

AAlameda Research is managing and distributing its digital assets as part of court-supervised bankruptcy proceedings to recover value for creditors.

QHow much Solana does Alameda Research still hold in its on-chain wallets as mentioned in the article?

AAlameda Research still holds roughly $321 million worth of SOL in its on-chain wallets.

QWhat event triggered the collapse of Alameda Research in November 2022?

AThe collapse of Alameda Research was triggered by the dramatic failure of FTX, which revealed that billions of dollars in customer funds had been misused and transferred between the exchange and Alameda.

QWhy do market participants closely monitor movements from Alameda's wallets?

AMarket participants closely monitor movements from Alameda's wallets because the large holdings represent a potential supply overhang, and distributed tokens could eventually be liquidated, influencing trader sentiment.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit19m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit19m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit34m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit34m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片