Aave: 31% revenue growth yet price slides toward $100 – Explained!

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-09Last updated on 2026-03-09

Abstract

Aave generated $1.62 million in daily fees and $82.14 million over the past 30 days, demonstrating strong revenue growth in the DeFi credit sector. The protocol saw a 31% month-over-month revenue increase in February and 38% year-over-year growth. Despite this, the AAVE token price remained in a severe downtrend, sliding toward the $100 support level. Analysis using MVRV Pricing Bands indicated that the token was severely undervalued, with its price well below the realized value of $191.59. The lack of large whale orders and a low percentage of addresses in profit (30%) suggested continued bearish pressure and potential further price declines. A break below $100 could signal more downside, while a move above $132 is needed for a bullish shift.

Aave [AAVE] generated $1.62 million in daily fees, it was reported recently. Over the past 30 days, its revenue has reached $82.14 million. This proved the DeFi sector’s credit-driven protocols to generate revenue.

The Aave protocol saw a 31% month-over-month revenue growth in February, generating $13.4 million. Year-over-year, this figure was at 38%, yielding $145 million in revenue in 12 months.

Even though borrowing demand continued to grow each month and Aave proved that it was at the core of DeFi’s credit structure, the token prices remained in a severe downtrend. The MVRV Pricing Bands above showed that AAVE was severely undervalued.

These pricing bands use the realized price and multiples of this metric to estimate levels of extreme unrealized profits and unrealized losses.

In this way, it allows market participants to understand where profit-taking activity and capitulation are likely to be at their zeniths.

The realized price of AAVE was at $191.59, and the lower realized price band (0.8 multiple) was at $152. The price of the token was well below this level and sliding lower each week.

In 2022-23, the DeFi protocol’s token prices remained at severely undervalued levels for over a year before recovering.

Whale orders, or the lack thereof, betray smart money intentions

The Spot Average Order Size measures the average size of executed trades. Larger sizes indicate whale interest.

It is not always that whales are correct- for example, from October to December 2025, big whale orders were seen on exchanges.

Yet, this did not stop the AAVE downtrend. At the time of writing, the order sizes were smaller, the downtrend was still in play, and the token remained undervalued.

This undervalued argument has not yet attracted the next wave of whale orders, hinting at the potential for further price drawdown.

Historically, the Percentage of Addresses in Profit drops to bitter lows below 10% during the depths of bear markets. Once again, the period from June 2022 to September 2023 highlighted this fact.

At the time of writing, the percentage of addresses in profit was at a respectable 30%. It signaled an ongoing bear market, but also suggested that prices have a lot more room to go down. Investor caution is necessary.

On the price front, the bearish structure remained intact. The volume and momentum indicators confirmed sellers were in control. The rejection from $132 saw Aave token prices fall back toward the $100 support.

A drop below this support would be a strong sign of further bearish continuation. Meanwhile, a breakout above $132 is needed to shift the daily structure bullishly.


Final Summary

  • Aave was severely undervalued, based on the MVRV pricing bands.
  • The lack of large spot orders indicated the lack of whale buying, and another metric showed that investors might face more pain in the coming months.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was Aave's month-over-month revenue growth in February and how much did it generate?

AAave saw a 31% month-over-month revenue growth in February, generating $13.4 million.

QAccording to the MVRV Pricing Bands, what was the realized price of AAVE and what did it indicate about the token's value?

AThe realized price of AAVE was $191.59, and the token's price was well below the lower realized price band of $152, indicating it was severely undervalued.

QWhat does the Spot Average Order Size metric measure, and what did its current level suggest about whale activity?

AThe Spot Average Order Size measures the average size of executed trades, with larger sizes indicating whale interest. The current smaller order sizes suggested a lack of whale buying interest.

QWhat did the 'Percentage of Addresses in Profit' metric show at the time of writing, and what did this signal?

AAt the time of writing, the Percentage of Addresses in Profit was at 30%, which signaled an ongoing bear market and suggested that prices had more room to fall.

QWhat are the two key price levels identified for AAVE's potential future price movement?

AA drop below the $100 support level would signal further bearish continuation, while a breakout above $132 would be needed to shift the daily structure to bullish.

Related Reads

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit12m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit12m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手24m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手24m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit39m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit39m ago

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手42m ago

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手42m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy AAVE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Aave Protocol (AAVE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Aave Protocol (AAVE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Aave Protocol (AAVE)After purchasing your Aave Protocol (AAVE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Aave Protocol (AAVE)Easily trade Aave Protocol (AAVE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.8k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy AAVE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AAVE (AAVE) are presented below.

活动图片