AI Competition's New Battlefield: Long-term Memory Becomes the Pain Point, How Users Can Secure Their Own Context Ownership

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-02Last updated on 2026-06-02

Abstract

A new front is emerging in the AI competition: user ownership of long-term memory and context. As AI models like ChatGPT evolve from chat tools into persistent digital assistants that learn user preferences and workflows, a critical question arises: who owns this accumulated "memory"? Currently, this personalized data is siloed within each platform (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), creating a fragmented experience when users switch models. The article highlights ZetaChain's strategic pivot from blockchain interoperability to addressing this AI "memory" challenge. Its new focus is on building a "Private Memory Layer" and an "AI Consumer Layer." Through its consumer product Anuma, ZetaChain aims to give users encrypted, portable memory that can be used across different AI models. This system also envisions programmable, auditable permissions for AI agents and a framework where user knowledge can be monetized as shareable assets. Ultimately, ZetaChain's transformation reflects a broader infrastructure shift. The future bottleneck is less about raw model capability and more about continuous context, user-controlled identity, and permission management across multiple collaborating AI agents. The company's ZETA token is being repositioned as an "AI infrastructure token" to facilitate access, payments, and permissions within this proposed ecosystem. The core narrative advocates for returning control of personal context and AI relationships to users, rather than leaving them locke...

Author: Zen, PANews

You spent half a year training ChatGPT to understand your work habits, writing style, and long-term projects. It learned how you like to revise articles, which companies you often follow, and gradually came to understand your preferences for content structure, tone, and information density.

But one day, a newer, more powerful model appears. You open Claude, Gemini, or DeepSeek, and find yourself having to start all over again. The new model doesn't know you, isn't aware of the work context you've accumulated over the past months, and doesn't understand how you think, write, or make decisions.

Over the past two years, the most important competition in the AI industry revolved around "model capabilities." Whose reasoning was stronger, whose context window was longer, whose coding ability was better—these factors almost decided everything. But now, a new issue is emerging: AI is getting to know you better, but who exactly does this "understanding" belong to?

Role Shift: AI Transforms from Chat Tool to Personal Digital Assistant

In November 2022, the AI chatbot ChatGPT debuted, sparking a global chat craze. It reached 100 million monthly active users in just two months, becoming the fastest-growing consumer application in history. At that time, large language models were more like an "advanced search." Users asked AI questions, it generated instant answers, and when the conversation ended, the relationship also ended.

But in recent years, the role of AI has been undergoing a significant shift. As reasoning capabilities, coding abilities, and tool-calling functionalities have continuously improved, AI has begun to deeply integrate into real workflows. More and more people are using it to write code, organize information, analyze data, plan trips, manage schedules, and even for long-term participation in content creation and business decisions.

In many cases, users are no longer just "asking AI questions" but are engaging in long-term collaboration with AI. It starts to understand your working style, expression habits, and long-term goals, begins to consistently participate in the same project, the same workflow, and even gradually takes on some execution tasks. To some extent, AI is evolving from a one-time Q&A tool into a persistently available personal digital assistant.

And as model capabilities have significantly increased, the capabilities of top products have increasingly converged, and with AI being used long-term and extensively, new issues have begun to surface.

Once AI begins long-term collaboration, "memory"—the system storing and recalling past experiences to improve decision-making and overall performance—ceases to be just an inconsequential database. In many application scenarios, the bottleneck is no longer the model's reasoning level, but the capabilities related to long-term memory and context management. Cloudflare has also directly labeled agentic memory as one of the biggest challenges and fastest-developing areas in current AI infrastructure.

Leading AI companies have also realized that long-term memory is becoming part of the product experience. OpenAI has split ChatGPT's memory into saved memories and reference chat history. The former saves information users wish to retain long-term, while the latter allows ChatGPT to extract useful content from past conversations for subsequent personalized responses. Gemini has also begun learning user preferences based on prior conversations. Claude has introduced Memory and supports memory import and export.

Platform Silos Turn AI 'Memory' into a New Industry Battlefield

But the problem is that these memory capabilities are largely still confined to their respective platforms, belonging only to the platform's independent account systems and product environments—they remain isolated islands. Although Anthropic supports memory import/export, it currently functions more like a migration tool for Claude rather than a universal memory standard jointly adopted by various companies.

And this is precisely the gap ZetaChain aims to fill. After fully pivoting to AI, ZetaChain began extending the concept of "ownership," originally from the crypto world, further into AI memory and user context. What it hopes to build is not just a chat product, but a privacy memory layer (Private Memory Layer) independent of model platforms, allowing users to truly own their long-term memories, behavioral preferences, and AI context.

ZetaChain's consumer AI product, Anuma, advocates for users to own a set of encrypted private memory, supporting seamless use across mainstream AI models like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc. Users don't have to rebuild context, preferences, and work habits every time they switch models. Instead, users control access permissions and bring their historical memory to different models and agents.

As AI gradually accumulates users' usage preferences, writing habits, workflows, and historical conversations, the so-called "memory" will increasingly resemble a layer of "personality mirror." It not only determines whether a model's responses align with user preferences but may also determine whether the model, when making decisions on your behalf in the future, acts according to your habits and values.

Beyond giving users ownership of memory and allowing them to choose models with different strengths for different tasks, Anuma is also building a programmable, auditable, and revocable permission system. It allows AI agents to read records once, with permissions revocable at any time, and all permission changes can be recorded and tracked on-chain.

Moreover, users' memory and knowledge graphs can become assets that can be shared, authorized, and monetized without exposing raw data. This enables professional users such as investors, doctors, lawyers, and developers to encapsulate their expertise into agents, publish them to an Agent Marketplace, and earn revenue when others call upon them.

From Cross-Chain to Cross-AI Platform: Why Did ZetaChain Pivot?

What enables Anuma to achieve these functions is the underlying infrastructure, Private Memory Layer, developed by ZetaChain. As an infrastructure for AI-focused private memory, identity, permissions, payments, and agents, it aims to allow applications and agents to collaborate across models while users retain control.

ZetaChain had long focused on cross-chain interoperability infrastructure, with the core goal of solving asset and message transfer issues between different blockchains. Regarding the "unified multi-chain entry point," it built a considerable network and narrative. According to official data, there are 11.9 million unique addresses and 241 million transactions on its blockchain.

But after Anuma publicly launched on April 27th this year and surpassed 50,000 users in its first month, ZetaChain began deciding to fully pivot to AI, gradually phasing out its cross-chain interoperability business. Behind this pivot lies a relatively clear internal logic.

In the past, ZetaChain mainly dealt with the issue of incompatibility between different chains. In today's AI world, similar fragmentation exists. To some extent, digital assets are to blockchain what memory and context are to AI. Different models have their own closed memory systems; once users switch platforms, the long-accumulated context and behavioral preferences are often interrupted.

With developments in recent years, ZetaChain believes the biggest challenge it faces now is no longer cross-chain transfers between blockchains, but continuity between different models and agents, and the issue of user ownership over their own context.

a16z crypto previously mentioned in an analysis article that agents have begun to become economic participants, but they still lack portable identities, programmable payments, verifiable authorization, and the public coordination layer needed for cross-environment collaboration. Therefore, compared to many AI + Crypto projects awkwardly searching for application scenarios, ZetaChain's pivot logic is much smoother.

In business history, successful pivots by infrastructure companies are not uncommon. Such companies often don't simply switch tracks but chase new bottlenecks based on product logic. NVIDIA's most important initial narrative was graphics computing and gaming GPUs. But with the rise of AI, its GPU architecture ultimately became the core infrastructure for the entire AI industry. Infrastructure never revolves around the same constraint point forever, and true winners are often those who earliest identify that the "next constraint point" is emerging.

From Privacy Memory Layer to AI Consumer Layer

With the explosive development of AI, the future form of AI will clearly not be confined to chat windows but will gradually evolve into numerous long-term, collaborative AI assistants. Based on this judgment, after proposing the "Privacy Memory Layer" and attempting to solve how AI can understand users long-term, ZetaChain further proposed the concept of the "AI Consumer Layer," hoping to redefine the relationship between users and AI after AI works on behalf of users long-term.

In ZetaChain's vision, future AI won't just answer questions but will deeply participate in users' workflows and daily decisions. Different AI assistants will be responsible for different tasks—some handling code, others organizing finances, some planning schedules, and others participating long-term in content creation and research analysis. For these AIs to truly collaborate, they need to share the same set of long-term context, identity, and permission systems.

Therefore, the so-called "AI Consumer Layer" essentially attempts to integrate originally scattered capabilities into a unified framework. Among them, Memory handles long-term context, Permissions handles access control, Identity handles the identity system, Payments handles invocation and payments between AIs, and Agents are the AI networks that ultimately execute tasks on behalf of users.

This is why "ownership" has become the core concept ZetaChain repeatedly emphasizes.

Because in this system, whether users still own their context, permissions, and identities becomes paramount. For example, in the future, an AI responsible for code review could be temporarily authorized to read a GitHub repository; an AI handling tax organization could read tax filing materials once; an AI arranging travel could only access travel history and calendar permissions. Permissions would no longer be uniformly controlled by the platform but dynamically allocated by users and revocable at any time.

And this is precisely why blockchain is starting to reconnect with AI.

As more and more AIs simultaneously work on behalf of users, "who can access what," "whether permissions are revocable," and "whether invocations are traceable" will gradually become new infrastructure issues. And on-chain permission systems are naturally suited to handle this kind of multi-party collaboration.

'AI Infrastructure Token' ZETA Brings Utility Growth Alongside Pivot

Alongside ZetaChain's strategy adjustment, the functionality and utility of the ZETA token have also been adjusted. In the past, ZETA was more like a traditional public chain token, primarily serving Gas, validation, and cross-chain network security functions, with not much innovation in its mechanism design. But under the new narrative, ZETA will become an "AI Infrastructure Token," with its utility significantly enhanced.

According to ZetaChain's current description, ZETA will serve several purposes in the future:

Firstly, access permissions for AI models and Agents. Access to certain advanced models, specialized AI tools, or Agent services may require unlocking or payment of invocation fees using ZETA.

Secondly, payment settlement between Agents. ZetaChain mentions that future interactions between different AIs and applications will be completed via on-chain payments through the x402 protocol. Its goal is clear: if AIs in the future will automatically invoke other AIs, then machines also need a native payment system.

Thirdly, on-chain operations for permissions and memory updates. User modifications to permissions, access controls, and memory states may all become on-chain records in the future.

Fourthly, the creator economy. ZetaChain hopes that in the future, professionals like developers, researchers, lawyers, and doctors can encapsulate their knowledge into AI tools or Agents, earn revenue through invocations, with ZETA facilitating the flow of value.

However, it's important to note that this part currently remains largely at the narrative stage. Because the AI Agent economy itself is still far from mature, and truly large-scale "AI invoking AI" and "Agent autonomous payments" have not yet emerged. Concepts like x402, on-chain permissions, and AI identity currently belong more to pre-built infrastructure than to validated, large-scale demand.

But the reason ZetaChain and its product logic are noteworthy is not just because it's building an infrastructure paired with an AI product. More importantly, it attempts to redefine whether users' future memory, identity, context, and AI permissions belong to the platform or to users themselves. What ZetaChain wants to do, in essence, is to ensure these things are no longer controlled by platforms but returned to the hands of users.

Related Questions

QWhat is the core issue regarding AI 'memory' that the article identifies as a new competitive battleground?

AThe article identifies that AI 'memory' or long-term context is becoming a new competitive battleground. Currently, AI models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini store user preferences, work habits, and project contexts, but this 'memory' is siloed within each platform. This creates a problem where users lose their accumulated context and personalized AI understanding when switching between different AI models or services.

QWhat problem does the company ZetaChain aim to solve with its 'Private Memory Layer'?

AZetaChain aims to solve the problem of fragmented and platform-owned AI memory. Its Private Memory Layer is designed to be a user-owned, encrypted layer for storing long-term memory, behavior preferences, and AI context. This allows users to take their personalized 'memory' and seamlessly use it across different AI models (like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) and agents, maintaining continuity without starting over on each platform.

QWhat major strategic shift did ZetaChain make, and what was the logical connection behind this shift?

AZetaChain made a major strategic shift from being a cross-chain interoperability infrastructure for blockchains to focusing entirely on AI. The logical connection is that the core problem of interoperability and fragmentation exists in both domains. Just as it previously solved the issue of assets and data being siloed on different blockchains, it now addresses the similar issue of user context and memory being siloed within different, closed AI platforms.

QAccording to the article, how does the role of AI assistants evolve in the future vision presented by ZetaChain?

AIn ZetaChain's future vision, AI assistants evolve from simple chat tools into a network of long-term, specialized digital assistants that deeply collaborate. Different AI agents will handle specific tasks (e.g., coding, finance, travel planning, content creation). For them to work together effectively, they will need to share a unified framework for long-term context (memory), user identity, permissions, and a native payment system for inter-agent transactions.

QWhat new utility is the ZETA token expected to gain following ZetaChain's转型 (transformation) to AI?

AFollowing its transformation, the ZETA token is expected to evolve into an 'AI infrastructure token' with significantly expanded utility. Its expected new uses include: 1) Access and payment for premium AI models and agent services. 2) Settlement for payments between different AI agents (via protocols like x402). 3) Facilitating on-chain operations for updating user permissions and memory access controls. 4) Powering a creator economy where professionals monetize their expertise by packaging it into AI agents or tools.

Related Reads

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

"DeepSeek and the $1 Trillion Infrastructure Question" The article examines whether DeepSeek's AI optimization breakthroughs could potentially save China $1 trillion in future AI infrastructure costs. The analysis begins with Nvidia's upcoming Vera Rubin AI platform, costing ~$7.8 million, where memory (HBM4/LPDDR5X) constitutes $2 million—a 435% cost increase in one year, highlighting how AI hardware spending is shifting toward expensive memory components. DeepSeek's approach works in the opposite direction. Through three key technical innovations showcased in DeepSeek V4, the company dramatically improves hardware efficiency: 1. **Memory Compression (MLA)**: Re-engineers the attention mechanism to compress long-context memory (KV Cache) by over 90%, drastically reducing expensive HBM usage. 2. **Selective Activation (MoE)**: Employs Mixture-of-Experts architecture where only a small fraction of parameters (e.g., 49B out of 1.6T in V4-Pro) are activated per token, allowing most parameters to reside in cheaper memory/SSD. 3. **Computation Caching**: Reuses previously computed results via cache hits, replacing expensive GPU computations with cheap memory reads. Combined, these optimizations allow the same hardware to produce approximately 4x more tokens, effectively reducing required hardware investment by 75%. DeepSeek's pricing reflects this: a 10-billion token workload costs ~$522 monthly versus ~$9,000-$10,000 for competitors. The $1 trillion savings projection stems from McKinsey's estimate that global AI infrastructure will require ~$5.2 trillion investment by 2030. As China's daily token consumption grows toward quadrillions, even marginal efficiency gains scale massively. With a conservative 4x throughput improvement, China could avoid building tens of thousands of AI data centers equivalent to ~7 trillion RMB ($1 trillion) in saved investment. Critically, this strategy shifts dependency from scarce, expensive GPU/HBM—where China lags—toward more accessible storage, caching, and systems engineering where domestic suppliers like CXMT are gaining strength. Rather than "replacing Nvidia," DeepSeek rebalances AI's value chain away from monolithic hardware dependency. Ultimately, DeepSeek's technical breakthroughs could lower the barrier to AI adoption across Chinese industries by making advanced capabilities affordable at scale—transforming who can access next-generation AI.

marsbit21m ago

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

marsbit21m ago

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

This paper, "Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward," proposes a paradigm shift in combating AI hallucination. It argues that the current mainstream approaches—striving for omniscience by scaling data/models or having AI abstain from uncertain answers—are fundamentally flawed. The former has inevitable knowledge gaps, while the latter imposes a crippling "utility tax," requiring the rejection of many correct answers to achieve high accuracy, due to models' poor "discrimination" (the ability to distinguish correct from incorrect answers internally). The core contribution is redefining hallucination not as "being wrong," but as "expressing false information with unwarranted certainty." The proposed solution is **Faithful Uncertainty** or **Metacognition**: enabling AI to accurately perceive its internal uncertainty and honestly express it in its language (e.g., using hedging phrases when unsure). This creates a more reliable assistant that provides useful information while signaling its confidence, minimizing harm from errors. The paper emphasizes that metacognition is critical for the era of AI Agents. Without it, Agents cannot intelligently decide when to use tools like search engines, leading to inefficiency and misuse. Key implementation challenges are highlighted: the "bootstrapping paradox" of training with static uncertainty data, the "alignment distortion signal" where human preference training suppresses internal uncertainty cues, and the difficulty of causally evaluating true metacognition vs. its superficial imitation. The paper concludes that the goal should not be an infallible AI, but one that is honest about the limits of its knowledge, thereby building user trust through transparent communication of its certainty.

marsbit25m ago

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

marsbit25m ago

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin has recently declined, hitting a two-month low near $66,123, while Ethereum fell to a three-month low around $1,837. Analysts suggest the drop is not merely due to factors like ETF outflows or MicroStrategy's selling but reflects a deeper issue: Bitcoin is losing a broader asset competition. In a near-zero interest rate environment, Bitcoin previously thrived as an outlet for investor dissatisfaction with inflation and limited options. However, the market landscape has shifted. Bitcoin now occupies an "awkward middle ground," facing competition on three fronts. For inflation hedging, investors prefer gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers—assets with tangible backing and clearer pricing power. For growth exposure, AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits are more attractive. Even within crypto, investors can choose stablecoins, exchanges, or infrastructure firms tied directly to adoption, offering clearer business models and leverage. Thus, Bitcoin is no longer the top choice for hedging, growth, or crypto exposure. This shift is evident in market reactions: despite recent warnings about persistent inflation from a Fed official, Bitcoin did not rally as it might have in the past. Instead, capital flowed to assets with direct commodity or energy exposure. The recent ETF outflows and MicroStrategy sales are symptoms, not causes, of this new reality. Investors are becoming more selective, demanding clearer value propositions beyond mere scarcity. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is not about it being a bubble or failed technology, but that scarcity alone is no longer sufficient.

华尔街日报28m ago

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

华尔街日报28m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy ZEN

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Horizen (ZEN) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Horizen (ZEN) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Horizen (ZEN)After purchasing your Horizen (ZEN), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Horizen (ZEN)Easily trade Horizen (ZEN) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.1k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy ZEN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ZEN (ZEN) are presented below.

活动图片