【龙虎榜】 BTC投资者大面积获利,公链EOS等涨幅居前

火必研究院Published on 2022-03-28Last updated on 2022-04-02

Abstract

BTC波动空间虽然不大,但是近期持续上涨交易日明显增加。

1、大盘走势:站上365日均线,获利盘增加

BTC波动空间虽然不大,但是近期持续上涨交易日明显增加,价格轻松确认了对365日均线的突破。这说明,BTC投资者的获利状况得到明显的改善。目前,BTC已经处在1年内盈利相对均衡的状态。多数投资者获利,但是获利空间非常小。即便如此,市场依然较好的验证了反转信号。2022年以来,BTC已经在365日均线下方确认了底部形态,接下来是对该反转形态的进一步强化。

2、消息面解读:

俄罗斯总统助理梅金斯基表示,双方在一些次要问题上立场正在趋近,但在主要政治问题上仍“原地踏步”。与此同时,美国已与欧盟和七国集团(G7)合作,对400余个俄罗斯个人和实体进行制裁。这表明,俄乌局势对金融市场影响依然没有根本改善。

美联储方面,市场押注美联储到5月份加息25个基点的概率为28.9%,加息50个基点的概率为71.1%。这说明,美联储控制通货膨胀的决心坚定,利率可能会迅速上升。在没有新的地缘政治担忧的情况下,这种情况不仅可能会给金价带来压力,BTC上涨空间同样可能受到影响。特别是资金层面,美元指数上行,金融市场的资金流出以来都可能维持高位。

3、龙虎榜:

龙虎榜涨幅靠前币种里,有多个币种与DeFi概念有关。XIDO大幅度领涨回升,因此与XIDO相关的币种表现较好。AAVE、SNX、Maker等涨幅排名前十以内。不同生态代币方面,波卡测试网代表KSM,雪崩生态AVAX涨幅排名靠前。CAKE作为去中心化交易所,短线持续技术反弹,涨幅较大。

涨幅榜

涨幅排名靠前的币种里,公链出现的频率较高。老牌公链EOS、VET、ZIL表现较好,价格上涨空间在19.2%、19.3%和18.3%。新公链ICP价格也反弹达15.4%。从盘面走势来看,目前热点集中在低估值的板块里。老牌公链价格较低,特别是近2年来的涨幅空间有限,补涨行情在这里集中体现。

存储板块方面,FIL和HOT同样有不俗的表现,24小时价格涨幅分别达到了25.7%和25.4%。FIL为存储板块龙头,币价在触及历史最低点16.4美元以后,出现技术性反弹走势。目前从底部反弹空间达到50%。

锁仓数据方面,EOS作为公链的锁仓数据触底回升,并未像价格一样低迷。锁仓数据从7000万美元回升到了3.35亿美元,回升接近400%。由此来看,公链确实出现了更低的估值和更好的买入机会。

跌幅榜

下跌的币种较少,跌幅靠前的币种平台币OKB、HT和BNB。同时,Gamefi概念币AXS跌幅较大,稳定币UST和USDT跌幅居前,涨幅较大的WAVES也出现了调整。

Related Reads

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

Has the crypto utopia collapsed? The industry is at an inflection point as the hype fades. The prevailing view is that crypto has become an outlet for excess liquidity, with many participants leaving as financial returns have fallen short of past-decade expectations. The 2021 boom has been revealed as an illusion, placing the industry in the "trough of disillusionment" on Gartner's Hype Cycle. This forces a return to first principles: re-evaluating token value, securing DeFi protocols, and finding real-world applications. The core failure is a repetitive cycle of reflexive speculation, driven by the premature liquidity of tokens. The industry's incentives prioritized short-term gains over genuine innovation. While curiosity drives invention, recent DeFi hacks signal a need for engineering and iteration, including token models. The culture is shifting; the industry is no longer in its early stages. Positioned at a turning point on the technology adoption curve, crypto faces the immense challenge of rebuilding finance from scratch, a process of inevitable iteration and failure. Regarding crypto VC, claims of its death are overstated. The exceptional returns of 2016-2021 were an anomaly. The initial crypto-anarchist ethos has largely been co-opted by Wall Street and regulators. The utopian vision is over; the industry is being assimilated into the existing system, becoming a business. Current viable project categories include stablecoins, prediction markets, tokenized assets/RWA, perpetual contracts, and AI/agent integration. Crypto is converging with fintech, far from the envisioned DeFi revolution, and must find killer apps within regulatory boundaries. A reconciliation is possible: cryptocurrency may change value storage and transfer in subtle, imperceptible ways that integrate into existing systems, rather than through revolutionary fanfare. True creativity often emerges from adversity. There remains much to build for those driven by genuine curiosity.

marsbit7m ago

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

marsbit7m ago

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

On July 28th, Changxin Technology's stock price on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board experienced minor fluctuations. The company had made a historic market debut the previous day, becoming the first A-share stock to record a single-day trading volume exceeding 1 trillion yuan. This led to significant paper gains for its strategic investors. Among them, Xiaomi's wholly-owned subsidiary was allocated 18.24 million shares with an initial investment of approximately 158 million yuan. Reports estimated a paper profit of 717 million yuan for Xiaomi founder Lei Jun based on his shareholding structure. However, a Xiaomi executive clarified that this was a corporate investment and should not be conflated with personal wealth. Other major beneficiaries included Alibaba and Nio. Alibaba, an early investor, held nearly a 5% stake through two entities, with an estimated paper gain exceeding 160 billion yuan. Nio, participating in the strategic placement, also saw substantial paper returns. Additionally, state-owned banks and insurance institutions that invested in Changxin recorded potential gains in the hundreds of billions. Conversely, companies like Country Garden reportedly missed out on nearly 50 billion yuan in potential gains after divesting their stakes before the IPO due to liquidity pressures. The article notes that these are paper profits based on the listing price, as the allocated shares are subject to lock-up periods, and final realized gains will depend on future stock performance. An employee from Changxin Technology commented that ordinary staff remain focused on their salaries and benefits rather than the market hype.

marsbit16m ago

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

marsbit16m ago

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

"The Token vs. Outcome Sale: Key Paradoxes in the AI Business Model By mid-2026, the AI industry shows rapid growth in revenue and token usage, yet the underlying business models differ significantly. This article analyzes four structural paradoxes defining the current landscape, all pointing to the commoditization of intelligence and the concentration of profits in few segments. **The Cost Paradox: Cheaper Tokens, Heavier Bills** Despite a >95% price drop for equivalent AI capability since 2023, total spending has skyrocketed due to the Jevons Paradox: lower prices expand usage into previously uneconomical tasks. Furthermore, the shift to autonomous agents operating 24/7 multiplies consumption. However, efficiency gains often remain unrealized due to unchanged organizational workflows (the Solow Paradox). The focus is shifting from optimizing token price to optimizing the task itself. **The Hierarchy Paradox: The App is King vs. The App is Dead** While conventional wisdom holds that value accrues at the application layer, the AI stack is inverted. Infrastructure (chips) captures ~70% of industry revenue and ~80% of gross profit, while application-layer margins are thin (0-30%). Fast-evolving base models threaten "thin" apps. Sustainable applications are those that embed intelligence into specific contexts, possessing private data, workflows, or delivery capabilities that become more valuable as the base model improves. **The Responsibility Paradox: Profit Follows Accountability** Growth rates alone don't guarantee profit. A key differentiator is a company's willingness and ability to take responsibility for specific outcomes. Selling by the token competes for IT budgets; selling by the outcome (e.g., a resolved support ticket) taps into larger human labor budgets. Low-responsibility, high-volume tasks (e.g., generic客服) face commoditization. High-stakes, regulated domains (e.g., law, healthcare) where vendors assume heavier liability for results command higher margins, as seen with companies like Harvey in legal tech. **The Open-Source Paradox: Open Wins Traffic, Closed Wins Revenue** Open-source models dominate in usage share and developer adoption, often being 5-20x cheaper. However, closed-source models still capture the majority of enterprise spending (~89%). Enterprises pay a premium for closed-source reliability, support, compliance, and accountability. The total cost of ownership (TCO) is converging as closed-source prices fall faster than open-source builds trust, leading to hybrid deployments. Profit is migrating from the model layer itself to upstream (compute) and downstream (orchestration, data, services)."

marsbit17m ago

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

marsbit17m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片