Somnia price prediction – Should traders await a breakout after THIS consolidation pattern?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-09-14Last updated on 2025-09-15

Key Takeaways

The 4-hour timeframe revealed a bullish market structure. Somnia swing traders and investors can look to buy the token above the $1 psychological resistance, with a fair value support also highlighted in the $1.1 area.


Somnia [SOMI], at the time of writing, was up 3.75% in 24 hours, with its daily trading volume having declined by nearly 10%. This, on the back of a triangle pattern formation over the last few days. Can the bulls keep the uptrend going, or will the altcoin see another dip to $1?

Somnia traders have reason to be bullish, but beware of a short-term price dip

Somnia 4-hour ChartSomnia 4-hour Chart

Source: SOMI/USDT on TradingView

On the 4-hour chart, the swing structure of Somnia was still bullish despite the retracement below $1. However, the price action of the past two days highlighted SOMI falling towards the fair value gap (white box) at $1.06-$1.22.

Now, the $1.2 region has been defended as support, but the Awesome Oscillator showed that the bullish momentum may be slowing down. Selling pressure did not seem to be overwhelming though. In fact, the OBV has been trending higher swiftly following the price breakout past the $1.07 short-term resistance.

There was some selling pressure over the past 24 hours, but this was minor compared to the buying since 10 September. And yet, it could dictate short-term sentiment and drive a price move in the next 24-48 hours.

Somnia 1-hour ChartSomnia 1-hour Chart

Source: SOMI/USDT on TradingView

Zooming in on the 1-hour chart, Somnia seemed to be forming a descending triangle pattern. This pattern is generally a bearish pattern, since it usually comes during a downtrend. On rare occasions, such as the one SOMI presented, this triangle pattern can also form after a bullish move.

The selling volume over the past 24 hours was reflected on the OBV, which broke the short-term recent lows and signaled that sellers had the upper hand. If this continues, Somnia bulls might be forced to retreat to the $1-$1.1 demand zone.

Somnia Liquidation MapSomnia Liquidation Map

Source: Coinglass

Finally, the liquidation map showed that the long liquidations up to $1.2 were slightly larger than the short liquidations overhead. This meant that a price dip to $1.2 or slightly lower may be a possibility soon.

The $1.2-level was also the base of the triangle pattern. Hence, traders can wait for a retest of $1.15-$1.2 to look to buy the token. Invalidation would be a price drop below the $1-mark.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Share

Related Reads

EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Cutting Staking 'Subsidies' – What Does Ethereum Hope to Gain?

**EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Reducing Staking "Subsidies" – What Does Ethereum Want in Return?** EIP-8363 proposes burning an increasing portion of validator rewards as the staking rate rises, reaching 100% burn when 50% of ETH is staked. This analysis models its impact on issuance, yield, and staking equilibrium, examines whether ETH's yield explains its price, quantifies the chain economy's reliance on this yield, and presents conclusions. Key findings: 1. **EIP-1559 Burns Are Ineffective:** Post-merge, burning (via base fees) has collapsed by 98% and now offsets only 2.4% of new ETH issuance, making issuance policy Ethereum's sole remaining supply lever. 2. **EIP-8363's Real Impact:** At the current ~42.2M ETH staked, the proposal would cut issuance by ~58.6% and staking APR by ~56.4%, removing ~633k ETH ($1.55B) in annual dilution (0.53% of market cap). It's not zero issuance; that would require 43% more ETH staked. 3. **Self-Limiting Mechanism:** The design has a built-in equilibrium. At reasonable required returns (e.g., 2%), the system stabilizes at ~26% staking rate and ~0.48% annual inflation. 4. **Yield vs. Price:** No detectable statistical relationship exists between changes in staking yield and ETH price returns over 43 months. The natural 37% yield decline since 2023 did not drive price action. 5. **Chain Economy Dependence:** While LSTs like wstETH form ~34% of collateral in major lending markets, their utility as collateral remains if yield is positive. The direct revenue hit to protocols like Lido is significant (~50% of fee income) but not systemic. Staking-focused ETFs represent only 0.19% of ETH supply. 6. **Core Conflict:** The debate masks a zero-sum redistribution: cutting ~$1.55B in annual issuance transfers value from concentrated staking intermediaries (LST/LRT protocols, leverage players) to the dispersed majority of non-staking ETH holders. 7. **Outlook:** The proposal is economically sound for ETH's scarcity but politically difficult due to concentrated opposition. It is unlikely to pass in its current form.

marsbit16m ago

EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Cutting Staking 'Subsidies' – What Does Ethereum Hope to Gain?

marsbit16m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片