BTC波动率:一周回顾2024年9月30日–10月7日

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-10-07Last updated on 2024-10-07

Abstract

长期来看,顶部的旗形阻力太强,难以突破 —— 这仍是我们对下个月美国大选前市场走势的基本判断...

BTC波动率:一周回顾2024年9月30日–10月7日

关键指标:(香港时间 9 月 30 日下午 4 点 -> 香港时间 10 月 7 日下午 4 点):

  • BTC/USD 价格持平($ 63, 500 -> $ 63, 500),ETH/USD 下跌 4.6% ($ 2, 600 -> $ 2, 480)

  • BTC/USD 12 月(年底)ATM 波动率 下降 0.7 v(56.8 -> 56.1), 12 月 25 日风险逆转波动率 下降 0.4 v(2.7 -> 2.3)

现货技术指标概览

BTC波动率:一周回顾2024年9月30日–10月7日

  • 长期来看,顶部的旗形阻力太强,难以突破 —— 这仍是我们对下个月美国大选前市场走势的基本判断。

  • BTC 在 $ 65-66 k 区间反弹受阻,加上地缘政治局势升级,导致价格短暂跌破此前 $ 60-61 k 的区间支撑,但在$ 60 k 附近支撑强劲,稳住了价格。

  • 我们认为短期在  $ 60.5-60 k 的支撑位应能暂时稳住,而上涨可能在 $ 65 k 附近受限。整体来看,市场可能会进入盘整阶段,等待大选结果这一新的催化因素进而明确方向。

市场大事件

  • 中国的刺激政策带来的市场热情有所消退,市场焦点转向了中东不断升级的地缘政治局势。在伊朗导弹袭击以色列后(似乎造成的损害比以色列承认的更严重),以色列誓言报复,尽管目前报复的具体形式尚不明确。而美国似乎在努力劝说以色列,缓和局势,以防事态升级。紧张的地缘政治局势对加密货币价格施加了压力,BTC/USD 一度跌破 $ 60 k,ETH/USD 跌破 $ 2400 —— 近期加密货币价格与美股走势高度相关(未展现任何避险特性。)

  • 美国就业数据大幅超出预期,失业率回落至 4.05% ,新增就业岗位比预期多出 10 万!这提振了上周五的美国股市价格以及美元兑法定货币的汇率,不过加密货币反而因与股市相关的因素表现上涨,胜过了美元和美国利率的影响。表明市场的股市 Beta 效应更为显著,压过了美元和美国利率的影响。

  • 美国就业数据远超预期,失业率回落至 4.05% ,新增就业人数比预期高出 10 万!这提振了上周五的美股价格,同时美元兑法定货币走强。加密货币在这一数据发布后也出现了反弹,但其涨幅主要受到股市的 beta 影响,而不是美元与美国利率的 beta。

  • 在副总统候选人辩论中,Vance 表现出色,使得大选民调重新回到 50/50 局面。鉴于 Vance 为 Trump 阵营带来了更多中期的信誉,且支持加密货币,这将增加选举利好的可能性(之前 Trump 民调落后于 Harris,市场对此预期较为保守)

ATM 隐含波动率:

BTC波动率:一周回顾2024年9月30日–10月7日

  • 受地缘政治局势影响,BTC/USD 现货遭到清算,价格短暂跌破 $ 60 k,实际波动率从非常低迷的水平回升。尽管如此,高频和固定期限实际波动率仍仅在 40-45 的水平(较上周 35 有所上升),而每日波动率则在 45-49 左右。

  • 随着现货价格稳定在 $ 60 k,同时因上周五美股反弹而回升,隐含波动率在周末大幅回落,降至近期周期的新低。由于实际波动率低迷且需求不足,市场对持有头寸显得十分谨慎。周末的实际波动率极低(<25),但周一早晨因中东局势的缓和推动 BTC/USD 现货价格上涨 2.5% 后略有回升。

  • 除非中东局势再次升级或 CPI 数据出现显著异常,本周我们继续预期 Gamma 表现保持低迷(隐含波动率的前端将承压)。

  • 在周末前,市场从隐含波动率曲线中剔除了风险溢价,导致选举的波动率定价再次降低。鉴于目前距离选举仅剩四周,且选举赔率为 50/50 ,市场的关注很快将转向这次选举,以此作为下一个新的催化剂。随着选举日的临近,事件定价预计会随之上升。

偏斜/凸性:

BTC波动率:一周回顾2024年9月30日–10月7日

BTC波动率:一周回顾2024年9月30日–10月7日

  • 本周,偏斜价格有所回落,市场上出现大量 12 月看涨期权的供应(比例看涨价差)。此外,从实际波动率的角度来看,地缘政治消息导致现货价格向下波动的幅度更加剧烈,使得短期期限(尤其是 10 月到期和 11 月 8 日到期)的看跌合约需求相对较强。

  • 凸性在本周保持横盘,虽有部分比例看涨价差的供应,但被翼部期权(执行价格在 55/70 k 范围外)直接需求所抵消。

BTC波动率:一周回顾2024年9月30日–10月7日

您可在 t.signalplus.com 使用 SignalPlus 交易风向标功能,获取更多实时加密资讯。如果想即时收到我们的更新,欢迎关注我们的推特账号@SignalPlusCN,或者加入我们的微信群(添加小助手微信:SignalPlus 123)、Telegram 群以及 Discord 社群,和更多朋友一起交流互动。
SignalPlus Official Website:https://www.signalplus.com

Related Reads

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the Idaho-based memory chip maker, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion, securing its position as one of the top three DRAM manufacturers alongside Samsung and SK Hynix. Its survival and growth story is marked by a unique combination of political maneuvering and hard-won manufacturing efficiency, but also strategic missteps that now challenge its future. Founded in 1978 in Boise without significant government or capital backing, Micron repeatedly turned to Washington for survival during critical junctures. In the 1980s, it filed anti-dumping complaints against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which Micron had earlier licensed its 64K DRAM technology to. In 2002, Micron avoided heavy fines in a price-fixing investigation by acting as a whistleblower against its competitors, cementing its reputation as a "political opportunist." A major strategic error occurred in 2013 with its $2.5 billion acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. This deal burdened Micron with integrating incompatible manufacturing processes just as the industry was pivoting toward HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), a critical technology for AI. SK Hynix had launched its first HBM chip that same year. By the time AI demand exploded with ChatGPT in 2022, SK Hynix commanded about 85% of the HBM3 market, while Micron, playing catch-up, held only around 3%. In 2017, Micron employed similar tactics against a new competitor, Chinese startup Fujian Jinhua, by alleging intellectual property theft, which led to U.S. sanctions effectively crippling the firm. However, this strategy backfired in 2023 when China banned Micron's products from its critical infrastructure, causing its revenue share from China to plummet from 14% in FY2023 to just 7.1% by FY2025. Today, Micron faces a triple squeeze: it lags in the high-margin HBM race, faces pricing pressure in low-end DRAM from Chinese manufacturers like CXMT, and has lost crucial access to the booming Chinese AI server market. Despite its political strategies, Micron's core strength is its exceptional manufacturing cost control, achieved through decades of engineering. Its DRAM chips have a smaller cell area than its rivals, yielding more chips per wafer. This efficiency has been vital for weathering industry downturns. However, this advantage cannot compensate for the decade lost in HBM development. Micron is now racing to ramp up production of its HBM3E, certified by NVIDIA, and develop HBM4. Its future hinges on whether it can close this technological "time debt" through relentless R&D and execution, in a marathon where its competitors, having started earlier, are not slowing down.

marsbit12m ago

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

marsbit12m ago

Deconstructing Mysterious Researcher Serenity's Chokepoint Algorithm and the Global Revaluation of Equity Assets

Unmasking Serenity's "Chokepoint Theory": A Framework for AI-Era Investment This article deconstructs the investment methodology of the pseudonymous online researcher Serenity (formerly AleaBito on Reddit), who claims extraordinary returns by identifying critical bottlenecks in AI and robotics supply chains. Rejecting Wall Street's typical top-down analysis, Serenity employs a bottom-up, reverse-engineering approach. Starting with an end product like an Nvidia GPU cluster, he meticulously maps the global supply chain down to its most essential, irreplaceable physical components—the "choke points." These are low-profile, often monopolized sub-sectors where a disruption could paralyze entire downstream industries, analogous to a strategic strait controlling global oil flow. His primary focus is the physical evolution of AI data centers, specifically the shift from copper interconnects to silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO). He identifies five critical, monopolized technical barriers within CPO: high-precision fiber alignment components (e.g., FOCI), external light sources and high-power lasers (e.g., SIVE), molecular beam epitaxy equipment (ALRIB/Riber), ultra-high-purity red phosphorus raw materials, and Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) wafers (Soitec). Serenity extends this framework to humanoid robotics, arguing that while the AI "brain" resides in the US, the physical "body" hardware (actuators, gears, motors) is dominated by Asian manufacturers. He highlights a looming "demand tsunami" for specific rare earth elements essential for robot motors, presenting a severe future supply chain and geopolitical challenge. The article cites several of his investment targets (RPI, SIVE, Soitec, VLN, NBIS) where identifying such choke points, coupled with correcting market mispricings (e.g., ticker code confusion for VLN), allegedly led to significant re-ratings. Ultimately, the article posits that Serenity's core value is not in providing stock picks, but in demonstrating a paradigm: using deep technical analysis to find the silent, indispensable "physical switches" within complex systems, thereby exploiting institutional research blind spots. However, it warns of major risks, including illiquidity in micro-cap stocks, potential "pump-and-dump" accusations, and the foundational gamble that his identified technological paths (like CPO) are the correct and inevitable ones.

marsbit14m ago

Deconstructing Mysterious Researcher Serenity's Chokepoint Algorithm and the Global Revaluation of Equity Assets

marsbit14m ago

Cross-strait Regulators Jointly Block Hong Kong Stock Account Openings: Where Can Your Money Go Now?

**Summary:** On May 22, 2026, financial regulators in mainland China and Hong Kong launched a synchronized crackdown targeting informal channels used by mainland investors to trade in Hong Kong and US stocks via Hong Kong-based securities firms. The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) issued a stringent circular to licensed brokers, mandating stricter onboarding procedures for mainland clients. New requirements include a mandatory written declaration stating that all investment funds originate from *outside* mainland China and are from legal sources. The SFC also demanded the closure of accounts opened with suspicious documents and dormant accounts. Simultaneously, China's securities regulator, along with seven other ministries, initiated a two-year rectification plan, penalizing firms like Futu and Tiger Brokers for illegal cross-border operations. This effectively ends the previously common grey-area practice for mainlanders. Immediate impacts are evident. Social media reports show mainland investors traveling to Hong Kong for in-person account openings are now frequently denied after signing the new declaration, even at firms like uSMART that still accept applications. The declaration acts as both a compliance shield for brokers and a filter for clients. While major internet brokers have halted new mainland accounts, limited options remain. A few Hong Kong-licensed firms like uSMART, Fosun Wealth, and Cheerful still offer avenues, but approval is not guaranteed and hinges on proving offshore fund sources. Crucially, funding accounts must now be in the investor's own name at qualified Hong Kong or international banks, blocking previous informal methods like third-party transfers. For compliant access, official channels like Stock Connect, QDII, and the Cross-boundary Wealth Management Connect remain open. Individuals with verifiable overseas residency or status have better prospects. The crackdown signals the definitive end of the loosely regulated expansion period, forcing mainland investors toward stricter, fully compliant pathways for overseas asset allocation.

marsbit19m ago

Cross-strait Regulators Jointly Block Hong Kong Stock Account Openings: Where Can Your Money Go Now?

marsbit19m ago

Iran and the Fed -- Three Scenarios That Will Impact Global Markets Next

"Three Scenarios for Iran and the Fed Shaping Global Markets" Iranian geopolitics and the Fed's monetary policy path are two dominant themes for markets. Deutsche Bank Research outlines three scenarios linking Iran ceasefire outcomes to Fed policy, with oil prices as the key transmission channel. **Scenario 1: Peace Deal.** A breakthrough leading to the Strait of Hormuz reopening would ease near-term Fed tightening pressure. Recent inflation would be viewed as a temporary energy shock. However, medium-term risks remain; rate hikes could resurface in 2027 if inflation persists. **Scenario 2: Stalemate.** A breakdown in talks and a prolonged Strait closure, but no major escalation, is deemed the scenario with the *highest* Fed hike risk. Sustained high oil prices would feed into core inflation and threaten inflation expectations, while not severely damaging demand enough to give the Fed a reason to pause. This environment could necessitate multiple Fed rate hikes in 2026. **Scenario 3: Conflict Escalation.** Renewed conflict and sharply higher oil prices create a two-way risk for Fed policy. On one hand, it would risk severe inflation expectations de-anchoring, forcing a hawkish response. On the other, extreme oil prices could severely damage demand and the labor market, potentially shifting the Fed's focus toward easing. The ultimate policy decision would depend on which risk materializes first. Overall, Deutsche Bank's framework emphasizes that the path for oil prices, dictated by Iran, will define the nature of inflation pressures and ultimately determine the Fed's policy space. Key signals to watch include ceasefire progress, whether Brent crude stabilizes below $100, and any shift in Fed officials' rhetoric from discussing cuts to potential hikes.

marsbit28m ago

Iran and the Fed -- Three Scenarios That Will Impact Global Markets Next

marsbit28m ago

Hash Global Founder: Why I Also Choose to Liquidate All My ETH Holdings?

Hash Global founder explains his decision to sell all ETH holdings, despite recognizing the potential regulatory clarity from the US CLARITY Act as a positive development. He argues against the narrative that such clarity would automatically grant ETH a "monetary premium" comparable to Bitcoin or gold. The core of his critique is that market valuation for ETH remains tied to fundamental network metrics—like mainnet revenue, DeFi activity, staking yield, and competition—rather than a pure store-of-value narrative. He contends that legal classification solves compliance issues for institutions but does not inherently create the deep, historical consensus required for monetary status. Furthermore, Ethereum's complexity and role as a multi-functional infrastructure asset (gas, collateral, settlement layer) work against the simple narrative needed for such a premium. Looking forward, he suggests that the rise of DeFi and tokenized real-world assets (RWA) will mean ETH is not the only yield-bearing asset; tokenized gold, treasuries, and others will also offer programmable yield. Thus, ETH's "yielding" advantage diminishes. He believes monetary premium will likely remain with Bitcoin, physical gold, and potentially tokenized gold, while ETH's value is more accurately framed as a crucial infrastructure asset. Ultimately, he views CLARITY's benefit as reducing a "regulatory discount" on ETH, not unlocking trillions in monetary re-rating. ETH's long-term value is significant but stems from its network effects, developer ecosystem, and role in on-chain finance—not from being a direct substitute for gold.

marsbit30m ago

Hash Global Founder: Why I Also Choose to Liquidate All My ETH Holdings?

marsbit30m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片