$235mln Ethereum whale buying follows $2.8K breakdown – What happens next?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-26Last updated on 2026-01-26

Abstract

Ethereum broke below the $2.8K support, dropping to $2,787, extending a week of bearish momentum. Despite the decline, large investors seized the opportunity to accumulate. A new wallet bought 61K ETH ($171M) from Binance, while another whale purchased 70K ETH ($203.6M) over five days. Additionally, an institution swapped WBTC for 2,868 ETH. In total, whales accumulated 83,868 ETH worth $235.41 million, signaling strong conviction. Exchange data showed significant outflows, confirming aggressive accumulation. However, panic selling persisted, with some whales selling at a loss. Technical indicators like the MACD and RVI remain bearish, suggesting potential further downside to $2,633, though whale demand could support a rebound to $3,070 if sustained.

Ethereum breached the $2.8k support and dropped to a low of $2787 before buyers stepped in to defend the key support.

In fact, as of this writing, ETH traded at $2863, down 2.63% on the daily charts, extending a week-long bearishness.

With the altcoin’s weakness persisting and the price continuing to decline, whales and institutions keep buying the dip.

Ethereum whales and institutions continue to buy the dip

After Ethereum [ETH] fell below $2.8k, it created another buying window for investors, especially large entities. According to Onchain Lens, a newly created wallet purchased 61,000 ETH, worth $171.15 million, from Binance.

Lookonchain also reported another whale purchase. According to the on-chain monitor, OTC Whale bought another 20K ETH for $56.13 million.

Over the past 5 days, this whale has bought 70,013 ETH, valued at $203.6 million, and now holds 100,130 ETH, worth $283.79 million.

Additionally, World Liberty Financial [WLFI] rotated from Bitcoin [BTC] into ETH as Ethereum becomes increasingly affordable.

According to Lookonchain WLFI team swapped 93.77 WBTC, worth $8.08 million, for 2,868 ETH. In total, these whales accumulated 83,868 ETH worth $235.41 million.

Often, when whales and institutions accumulate during a prolonged period of weakness, it speaks of conviction. As such, these market players perceive the current conditions positively and see them as short-lived.

Furthermore, exchange activities echoed this whale-driven accumulation phase. According to CoinGlass, Ethereum has recorded negative Netflow for three consecutive days, with $2.69 billion in ETH flowing out of exchanges.

At press time, Netflow was -$68.9 million, a significant drop from -$224 million the previous day. A sustained negative netflow suggested higher outflows, a clear sign of aggressive spot accumulation.

Panic sellers remain extremely active

While some whales and institutions have turned to accumulate ETH at a discount, others panicked amid a prolonged stay below $3k.

According to Lookonchain, a whale panic-sold 5,500 ETH for $16.02 million at $2,912. Just days ago, the whale purchased 2000 ETH for $5.97 million at $ 2,984.

Historically, the whale has tended to purchase at higher levels and sell at lows, thereby realizing significant losses.

Additionally, a long-term dormant whale returned after nine years and deposited 50,000 ETH worth $145.25 million, according to Lookonchain.

When whales sell during a downtrend, it signals fear and a lack of conviction in the market, leading them to close to avoid further losses. This continued selling has further strained the market, leading to lower prices.

Bearish momentum is still prevalent

Despite continued whale accumulation, ETH has faced intense downside pressure, making whale demand inadequate for an upside reversal.

On the contrary, the downward momentum has remained elevated. In fact, the altcoin’s MACD dropped to -51, falling deeper into the bearish zone, signaling seller dominance.

Likewise, its Relative Vigor Index (RVGI) also fell into negative territory, currently holding at -0.3, validating downside strength.

These market conditions signal potential trend continuation, with ETH likely to drop below $2.8k again towards $2633. However, with whales accumulating, they have effectively held a $2.8k zone, and sustained demand from the group could lift ETH towards $3070.


Final Thoughts

  • Ethereum whales continue buying the dip, adding 83,868 ETH worth $235.41 million.
  • Ethereum [ETH] dipped to $2.7k before slightly rebounding to $2.8k amid intense bearish pressure.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the total amount of Ethereum purchased by whales and institutions as reported in the article?

AWhales and institutions accumulated a total of 83,868 ETH worth $235.41 million.

QWhat key support level did Ethereum breach before buyers stepped in?

AEthereum breached the $2.8k support level and dropped to a low of $2787 before buyers defended it.

QWhat on-chain metric indicated aggressive spot accumulation of Ethereum?

AA sustained negative netflow, with $2.69 billion in ETH flowing out of exchanges over three consecutive days, indicated aggressive spot accumulation.

QWhat are the two potential price targets mentioned for Ethereum's next move?

AETH could drop below $2.8k towards $2633 or, with sustained whale demand, lift towards $3070.

QWhich technical indicators showed that bearish momentum was still prevalent for Ethereum?

AThe MACD dropped to -51, falling deeper into the bearish zone, and the Relative Vigor Index (RVGI) fell into negative territory at -0.3, both signaling seller dominance and downside strength.

Related Reads

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit30m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit30m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit50m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit50m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit58m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit58m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片