Market Expert Reveals Why Ethereum Is A Better Bet Than Solana

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-06-04Last updated on 2026-06-04

Abstract

A market analyst argues that Ethereum (ETH) is a better long-term investment than Solana (SOL) despite recent price declines for both. While acknowledging Ethereum's weak price structure, falling network fees, and Solana's rapid growth in application fees, the analyst highlights key bullish factors for ETH. These include Ethereum's dominant share of on-chain stablecoin value (approximately $161.8 billion, or 50.7% of the total) and growing institutional interest, exemplified by BlackRock's recent filing for ERC-20 products on the Ethereum blockchain. The analyst projects that if the stablecoin market grows to $3 trillion by 2030 as forecasted, and Ethereum maintains its significant market share, over $1.5 trillion in value could be anchored to its network. This potential, coupled with the prospect of institutional asset tokenization, supports bullish long-term scenarios for Ethereum's market cap, ranging from 400% to 2,400% growth by 2029.

A crypto market expert has shared reasons why believes that despite the ongoing bearishness in the market right now, Ethereum (ETH) is still a better investment than Solana (SOL). Over the past few months, Ethereum has been in a slump, with its price falling below key support levels and underperforming the broader market. Meanwhile, Solana has seen its fair share of declines, plummeting by over 10% this past week. Despite the weakness across both assets, the analyst still picks Ethereum over Solana, citing ETH’s bullish drivers beyond price action and market trends.

Why Ethereum Is A Better Investment Than Solana

Emperor Osmo, a market analyst on X has presented a compelling case for why Ethereum remains a stronger bet than Solana despite ETH crashing more than 9.5% in the past week to trade near $1,870 at the time of writing. The analyst said he understands why many market participants and investors have turned bearish on the ETH price, pointing to weak price structure and declining network fees.

Osmo noted that Ethereum’s fee revenue has fallen sharply, while Solana continues to close the gap. According to him, Solana has generated about $3.859 billion in annual app fees compared to Ethereum’s $3.868 billion. The difference now stands at only $9 million after years of ETH maintaining a dominant lead.

The analyst also highlighted that Solana’s app fees are growing by roughly 9.5% per month, while ETH;s are declining by about 6.4%. Despite these trends, the analyst believes one key metric continues to support Ethereum’s long term bullish outlook. He revealed that the second largest cryptocurrency is currently sitting on about $161.8 billion in stablecoins, representing roughly 50.7% of all stablecoin value onchain.

Osmo also pointed to growing institutional interest in Ethereum’s ecosystem. He noted that BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, recently filed permissioned ERC-20 treasury products on Ethereum, picking the ETH blockchain above all others.

In addition, the analyst referenced projections from the U.S. Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, that the stablecoin market could eventually grow to $3 trillion by 2030. Based on those figures, Osmo argued that if Ethereum maintains its substantial stablecoin market share, more than $1.5 trillion in value could eventually be anchored to the network.

As a result, he believes that even if ETH’s current price reflects concerns around slowing fees and weak market structure, it does not represent its potential value backed by stablecoin growth and long term network retention.

Analyst Outlines Bull, Base, And Bear Case Scenarios For ETH

In an accompanying chart, Osmo mapped out bull, base, and bear case scenarios for Ethereum if it captures a significant slice of institutional stablecoin AUM. The analyst frames ETH’s potential upside against a projected $3 trillion stablecoin market, with retention hinging on whether the blockchain can ship what institutions need.

Source: Token Terminal

His bull case projects tokenized funds driving a 2,400% surge in ETH’s circulating asset market cap by December 2029. The base case puts that figure at 1,150%, while even the bear case holds upside at 400%.

ETH bears pull price below $2,000 | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QAccording to the analyst Emperor Osmo, what is the main reason Ethereum is considered a better investment than Solana despite its recent price slump?

AThe analyst believes Ethereum's long-term bullish outlook is supported by its massive stablecoin holdings, which represent about 50.7% of all onchain stablecoin value, and growing institutional interest, such as BlackRock filing ERC-20 treasury products on Ethereum.

QWhat key metric does Emperor Osmo highlight where Solana is closing the gap with Ethereum?

AEmperor Osmo highlights that Solana is closing the gap in annual app fee revenue. Currently, the difference is only $9 million, with Solana generating about $3.859 billion compared to Ethereum's $3.868 billion.

QWhat are the projected growth trends for app fees on Ethereum and Solana according to the article?

AAccording to the article, Solana's app fees are growing by roughly 9.5% per month, while Ethereum's app fees are declining by about 6.4% per month.

QWhat potential future market size for stablecoins does the analyst reference, and what implication does this have for Ethereum?

AThe analyst references a projection from U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that the stablecoin market could grow to $3 trillion by 2030. If Ethereum maintains its substantial market share, more than $1.5 trillion in value could be anchored to its network.

QWhat are the three scenarios (bull, base, bear) outlined by the analyst for Ethereum's potential market cap growth by December 2029?

AThe analyst's scenarios for Ethereum's circulating asset market cap growth by December 2029 are: a bull case projecting a 2,400% surge, a base case projecting a 1,150% surge, and a bear case projecting a 400% surge.

Related Reads

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

Claude Code introduces dynamic workflows, enabling AI to coordinate teams of specialized agents for complex tasks. This transforms Claude from a code assistant into a programmable workbench. Workflows address key limitations of single-agent systems: agentic laziness (premature task completion), self-preferential bias (favoring own outputs), and goal drift (losing sight of original objectives). The system allows Claude to dynamically create execution frameworks using JavaScript. It can split tasks, dispatch parallel agents for isolated work (e.g., in separate worktrees), implement adversarial validation, run tournaments, and synthesize results. This multi-agent approach is valuable for tasks requiring deep research, factual verification, code migration, root cause analysis, large-scale triage, and qualitative sorting. Key patterns include: classify-and-route, fan-out-and-synthesize, adversarial verification, generate-and-filter, tournaments, and loop-until-done. While token usage is higher, workflows excel where tasks resemble programming—needing problem decomposition, isolated context, hypothesis testing, and handling many details. They extend Claude Code's utility beyond technical work to areas like business plan review, resume screening, and naming brainstorm. The feature is not a universal solution but points to a future where AI tool competitiveness depends on organizing reliable, reusable, and auditable execution flows for complex goals.

marsbit39m ago

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

marsbit39m ago

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

Hyperliquid: The 24/7 Trading "Convenience Store" for Wall Street Hyperliquid, a decentralized cryptocurrency exchange, has become a go-to platform for Wall Street traders seeking to trade around the clock, especially during traditional market closures. Founded by Jeff Yan, a former quantitative trader, after the FTX collapse, the platform emphasizes user self-custody of assets. It offers a wide range of perpetual contracts—leveraged derivatives with no expiry—on assets from Bitcoin and crude oil to the S&P 500 and even pre-IPO companies like SpaceX. A notable example involves a hedge fund trader who capitalized on geopolitical news over a weekend, securing a 243% return on oil derivatives before markets reopened. The platform, run by just 11 employees, generated approximately $800 million in revenue last year, and its native token HYPE has seen significant growth. Its rise highlights the merging of traditional finance and crypto. While U.S. users are currently restricted, recent CFTC rule changes could open access. The platform is known for its transparency, having processed $10 billion in liquidations during a market crash while competitors faltered. Regulators warn of the high risks and complexity of perpetual contracts for retail investors. Key to its appeal is a strong community culture, direct engagement with founders, and a simple interface. Despite rules against VPN use, it attracts global users with its permissionless approach. Hyperliquid plans to expand into prediction markets and options, aiming to eventually host all financial activity.

marsbit39m ago

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

marsbit39m ago

Who Funds the Agents?

**Summary: Who Funds AI Agents?** OpenAI recently shut down a feature allowing AI agents to shop for users, highlighting the challenge of creating a secure and regulated environment for agent-driven transactions. While payment infrastructure exists, a crucial governance layer—defining spending limits, fraud detection, tax handling, and return policies—is largely missing. The potential is enormous: AI agents already processed $73M across 176M transactions last year, with McKinsey forecasting this could grow to $3-5T in global consumer commerce by 2030. The core competition isn't just about processing payments, which can be very cheap (especially with crypto-based settlement), but about controlling the rules that govern agent spending. Key players like Stripe and Coinbase are racing to dominate this governance layer. Stripe's acquisition of wallet provider Privy allows it to set spending policies, identity checks, and human-in-the-loop approvals directly at the wallet level. Similarly, Coinbase's stack, including its x402 protocol and AgentKit, embeds governance rules. This vertical integration across settlement, wallet, and governance layers is becoming the dominant strategy. Control over the governance layer is where significant future value lies. If agents handle trillions in transactions, even a small fee for managing compliance, fraud prevention, and policy enforcement could generate billions in annual revenue. The companies that successfully integrate across the payment stack will capture value from idle agent balances, transaction fees, and governance services, positioning themselves as the foundational banks of the AI agent economy.

marsbit1h ago

Who Funds the Agents?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片