Can the Price of Ethereum Break Through the $2000 Mark? Discussions About EIP-8361 Continue

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-05Last updated on 2026-08-05

Abstract

As of August 5th, Ethereum (ETH) is trading around $1,800, stuck below a descending trendline. It faces resistance between $1,887 and $1,918; a breakout above could propel the price towards the key psychological level of $2,000. On the daily chart, ETH trades below the 20-day SMA at $1,887.53 and the 100-day SMA at $1,918.22, remaining below three of the four major moving averages. However, it stays above the 50-day SMA at $1,788.07, continuing its recovery from June lows near $1,500. The 4-hour chart shows ETH approaching a breakout zone of $1,875-$1,885, though momentum remains weak without a clear uptrend. Market discussions continue around EIP-8361, a proposal aiming to burn an increasing share of consensus-layer rewards as the staking ratio rises, with full burning proposed after a 50% staking share is reached. This proposal is not yet approved and opinions within the ecosystem vary. Analyst Michael van de Poppe notes $1,800 as a critical support level, with a break above $2,000 potentially opening targets of $2,300 and $2,500. Ultimately, ETH's ability to sustainably recover past $2,000 appears more dependent on market demand and institutional investment than on EIP-8361.

As of August 5th, Ethereum ($ETH) is trading around $1800. The price is stuck below a descending trendline, adding a new factor to market outlooks alongside ongoing discussions around EIP-8361. Ethereum remains below the $1900 level, facing resistance in the range of $1887 to $1918. A breakout above this resistance could bring the price closer to the psychological level of $2000.

Technical Analysis and Price Movement

On the daily chart, the Ethereum price is trading below the 20-day Simple Moving Average (SMA) at $1887.53. The 100-day SMA forms another resistance at $1918.22, and the 200-day SMA is at a higher level of $2074.86.

In this configuration, Ethereum is below three of the four major moving averages. However, the price is still above the 50-day moving average at $1788.07, continuing the recovery that began after falling to around $1500 in June.

On the 4-hour chart, it can be seen that Ethereum is approaching the breakout zone between $1875 and $1885. Closing above these levels could create an opportunity for buyers to retest the $1900 level. However, momentum remains weak, and a clear uptrend has not yet formed.

EIP-8361 and Its Market Impact

EIP-8361, a proposal being discussed among Ethereum developers, aims to reduce the number of consensus-level rewards issued as the share of staked $ETH increases. The proposal envisions burning an increasing portion of validator rewards. It is suggested to burn all newly issued consensus-level rewards after a 50% staking share is reached. However, this proposal has not yet been approved, and there are differing opinions within the Ethereum ecosystem.

Analyst Michael van de Poppe stated that the $1800 level is a critical support level, and a breakout above $2000 could make levels of $2300 and $2500 accessible. However, Ethereum's ability to recover after reaching the $2000 level seems to depend more on market demand and institutional investment than on EIP-8361.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the approximate trading price of Ethereum as of August 5th according to the article?

AAs of August 5th, Ethereum was trading around $1800.

QAccording to the technical analysis, which key Simple Moving Average (SMA) levels form the main resistance for Ethereum?

AThe main resistance levels are formed by the 20-day SMA at $1887.53 and the 100-day SMA at $1918.22.

QWhat is the primary goal of the discussed EIP-8361 proposal for the Ethereum network?

AThe primary goal of EIP-8361 is to reduce the amount of consensus-layer issuance rewards as the share of staked ETH increases, eventually proposing to burn all newly issued consensus-layer rewards after a 50% staking share is reached.

QAccording to analyst Michael van de Poppe, what is the critical support level for Ethereum's price mentioned in the article?

AAccording to analyst Michael van de Poppe, the $1800 level is a critical support level.

QWhat does the article suggest is a more significant factor for Ethereum's ability to recover past $2000 than the EIP-8361 proposal?

AThe article suggests that Ethereum's ability to recover past $2000 depends more on market demand and institutional investment than on the EIP-8361 proposal.

Related Reads

Goldman Sachs Comments on SanDisk and Western Digital Earnings: Strong Performance, But Market Expectations Too High

Highsmith commented on Sandisk and Western Digital's earnings reports, noting that while both companies delivered strong quarterly results, excessively high market expectations are likely to prevent their stock prices from benefiting. The firm anticipates downward pressure on both stocks following the earnings releases. The core issue, according to Highsmith, is not a deterioration in fundamentals but rather market expectations that have overshot reality. Despite impressive beats on revenue, gross margin, and EPS for the quarter, guidance that simply meets or falls slightly below lofty expectations is being interpreted negatively. For Western Digital, Q2 revenue was largely in line with forecasts, while gross margin and EPS beat estimates. However, its Q3 revenue guidance midpoint matched consensus, and gross margin/EPS guidance was only slightly above. Highsmith views this as "not surprising enough" given pre-earnings optimism, maintaining a Neutral rating and a $650 price target. Sandisk's Q2 results significantly exceeded consensus for revenue and EPS. However, its Q3 guidance disappointed, with revenue and gross margin midpoints below Highsmith's forecasts and consensus. Although the stock has declined ~40% from its June peak, Highsmith believes the below-consensus guidance will lead to further pressure, while maintaining a Buy rating and a $2,200 target due to longer-term potential. Highsmith also warns of a negative spillover effect on Micron Technology's stock due to its similar end-market exposure to Sandisk.

marsbit1h ago

Goldman Sachs Comments on SanDisk and Western Digital Earnings: Strong Performance, But Market Expectations Too High

marsbit1h ago

After the Lending Markets Disappear, What's Left for These Public Chains?

"The Lending Market Vanishes: What Remains for These Blockchains?" Last week, Aave announced the closure of its lending markets on six blockchains where each generated less than $5,000 in quarterly revenue. This move highlights a critical trend: while the DeFi lending sector is growing overall, it is becoming highly concentrated on a few leading chains like Ethereum, Base, and Arbitrum. The article analyzes the cascading effects when a major lending protocol like Aave exits a chain. Past examples, such as Harmony Protocol and Fantom (later rebranded as Sonic), demonstrate that losing core lending infrastructure leads to a complete collapse of the credit ecosystem. This is because a functional lending market relies on a costly, interconnected stack of services—including reliable price oracles (often maintained by the largest protocol), deep DEX liquidity for liquidations, and stablecoin issuers willing to support native minting and redemption. Once the primary lending demand disappears, maintaining this infrastructure becomes commercially unviable, triggering an exodus of other service providers. The six chains Aave is leaving (including Soneium, Aptos, zkSync, and Scroll) are in an even weaker position than Harmony or Fantom were. They never developed substantial native lending demand despite significant initial funding. Aave's departure will likely accelerate the withdrawal of oracle providers, market makers, and stablecoin issuers, as their business cases depend on a functioning credit market. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle of centralization, where resources and activity consolidate on the most viable chains. The dilemma mirrors challenges in traditional finance, such as global banks withdrawing correspondent banking services from small countries due to high fixed compliance costs. However, unlike the traditional system where institutions like the World Bank can provide subsidies, there is no such safety net in the decentralized crypto space. The key takeaway is that while launching a new blockchain is cheap, operating a full-featured, sustainable credit infrastructure on it is extremely expensive. Aave has now set a minimum annual revenue threshold of $2 million for new chain deployments, roughly covering these fixed costs. The future for many smaller chains may be a fragmented ecosystem with flawed, unofficial forks of major protocols, or they may be left with nothing at all as DeFi lending continues its aggressive consolidation.

marsbit1h ago

After the Lending Markets Disappear, What's Left for These Public Chains?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片