Monad gains 14% – Yet THIS price barrier could cap MON’s upside

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-02Last updated on 2026-04-02

Abstract

Monad (MON) ranked fifth in daily gains among the top 200 cryptocurrencies by market cap, rising 14% at press time. Despite the price increase, trading volume remained relatively low, suggesting a lack of strong momentum. The altcoin has been trading within a bullish rising trend channel since late January, with bounces from support levels leading to higher structural lows. The recent surge followed a bounce from the $0.021 support zone, flipping above the SuperTrend indicator and showing increased buyer activity. However, MON faces a key resistance at $0.025, which has rejected price advances multiple times in the past two months. A break above this level could open the path toward $0.028, while a rejection could lead to a drop back to $0.022. Network activity on the Monad blockchain increased, with daily transactions rising 14% over three days and total transactions reaching a new all-time high of 237.9 million. This growth was partly driven by an airdrop event for NFT holders and active users. Despite positive technical and on-chain signals, the bullish continuation depends on overcoming the $0.025 resistance.

Monad [MON] ranked fifth in daily gains among the top 200 coins by market cap, climbing 14% at press time. However, the trading volume remained relatively low despite price action rallying, indicating a lack of momentum.

The altcoin appeared to be trading in a bullish pattern, implying that the technical setup was primarily responsible for the rally, with network activity also playing a role.

What Monad price needs to rally higher

Since the last ten days of January, Monad has been trading within a rising trend channel, according to the 4-hour timeframe chart. Every time MON has reached the channel’s lower support level, subsequent bounces have resulted in higher structural levels.

The current daily surge came after the price bounced off the $0.021 zone. The price action flipped above the SuperTrend, indicating a shift in market structure over the short term. Furthermore, the Bull Bear Power (BBP) confirmed the existence of more buyers.

Such continuation in buying activity would put $0.028 in sight. However, the altcoin’s price needed to break above $0.025, the middle of the channel, which acted as resistance in the current structure.

Over the past two months alone, the $0.025 level has rejected further appreciation four times, though in one instance, the MON price faked out. That showed how important the level was in opening the room for a potential rise to $0.028.

Source: MON/USDT on TradingView

In case the sellers reject a breach of $0.025, the altcoin may drop back to $0.022. According to the technical outlook, the price action was spending more time in the lower band of the channel, indicating weakness in buying.

Network activity surges

Meanwhile, the network activity in the Monad blockchain was growing.

For instance, there was a spike in social sentiment following an airdrop event. Monad sent tokens to all holders of Monad NFTs and active chain users.

At the time of writing, the Daily Transactions jumped by 14% over the past three days, rising from a low of 1.464 million to 1.870 million. Additionally, the Total Transactions made a new all-time high of 237.9 million, as per MondVision.

Source: MonadVision

The possibility of the MON price reaching $0.028 remains uncertain, as the bulls’ strength remains low. As the new month begins, the altcoin is trading below the $0.025 resistance level. Sellers have reacted, and buyers must push the price above this level to continue the bullish trend.


Final Summary

  • Monad gained about 14% in the past 24 hours as the price respected the technical outlook.
  • MON faces a key resistance at $0.025 to hit the top of the channel at $0.028.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was Monad's (MON) daily gain percentage and its ranking among top 200 coins by market cap?

AMonad gained 14% and ranked fifth in daily gains among the top 200 coins by market cap.

QWhat key resistance level must MON break to potentially rise to $0.028?

AMON must break above the $0.025 resistance level to potentially rise to $0.028.

QWhat technical indicator confirmed the presence of more buyers in the market for MON?

AThe Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator confirmed the existence of more buyers.

QHow did Monad's network activity, specifically Daily Transactions, change in the three days leading up to the article?

ADaily Transactions increased by 14% over the past three days, rising from 1.464 million to 1.870 million.

QWhat event caused a spike in social sentiment for the Monad blockchain according to the article?

AThere was a spike in social sentiment following an airdrop event where Monad sent tokens to all holders of Monad NFTs and active chain users.

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit3h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片