Monad surges 15% – But resistance now decides MON’s next move

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-26Last updated on 2026-03-26

Abstract

Monad (MON) surged 15% with trading volume up over 75%, pushing the price toward a key resistance level around $0.0248. The token rebounded from recent lows near $0.02039, showing signs of accumulation and buyer interest. The RSI at 61.38 indicates sustained bullish momentum without being overbought. However, exchange inflows of $684K suggest potential selling pressure as price tests resistance. Binance top traders maintain a strong long bias (57.01% long positions), supporting upside potential but increasing vulnerability to a reversal. A break above $0.0248 could target $0.0300, while failure may lead to a pullback toward support.

Monad [MON] has surged 15% while trading volume spiked over 75%, reflecting strong participation as price advanced toward resistance. Monad traded around $0.02512 after rebounding from recent lows, showing clear upward intent.

This move follows a steady recovery from consolidation near $0.02039, where buyers repeatedly stepped in. As a result, price action now reflects strengthening demand rather than random spikes.

However, the advance now meets a key reaction zone, where prior selling pressure has emerged. This positioning creates a critical moment, as rising activity aligns with MON testing resistance.

The current structure suggests strength, yet the reaction at this zone would define whether continuation holds or stalls.

Can MON break above this supply zone?

MON has reclaimed the $0.02039 support and continues printing higher lows, signaling controlled accumulation.

It now presses directly into the $0.0248 supply zone, where rejection has previously occurred. This structure shows compression beneath resistance, which often precedes expansion if buyers sustain pressure.

However, repeated tests without a breakout could weaken buyers. A clean move above $0.0248 would expose the $0.0300 level, which stands as the next visible resistance.

Until that happens, price remains inside a contested zone. The way price behaves here matters more than the move itself.

Sustained closes above this zone would confirm strength, while hesitation could invite renewed selling pressure from this level.

The RSI was around 61.38 at the time of writing, holding firmly above the midline and reflecting sustained buyer control.

It has maintained this position after gradually climbing from lower levels, showing structured strength rather than sharp spikes.

This behavior suggests buyers continue to support price during minor pullbacks. However, RSI remains below overbought territory, which leaves room for further upside attempts.

Source: TradingView

Exchange inflows rise as netflows turn positive

Recent netflow data shows a +$684K inflow, indicating tokens are moving back onto exchanges. This shift introduces a different dynamic compared to earlier phases, where outflows dominated.

As price approaches resistance, rising inflows suggest participants may prepare to distribute holdings.

This behavior often appears near key levels where traders reassess positions. However, inflows alone do not confirm selling pressure unless sustained over time.

The timing of this inflow matters, as it coincides with price testing supply. If inflows continue rising, sell-side availability would increase.

If they stabilize, the impact may remain limited. At present, netflows reflect a cautious shift rather than outright distribution.

Source: CoinGlass

Long bias holds as traders position aggressively

Binance top traders maintain a clear long bias, with long positions at 57.01% and a Long/Short Ratio near 1.33.

This positioning reflects strong directional conviction toward upside continuation. It shows traders continue building exposure even as price tests resistance.

However, elevated long positioning introduces sensitivity to sudden reversals. If price fails to break higher, these positions could unwind quickly. This dynamic creates a leveraged environment where price moves may accelerate in either direction.

The alignment between Spot strength and derivatives positioning supports the current advance.

Still, crowded positioning increases risk if sentiment shifts. At this stage, traders remain confident, yet the setup demands confirmation from price action.

Source: CoinGlass

Can MON sustain this move higher?

MON can sustain this move higher only if it secures acceptance above the $0.0248 supply zone with continued buyer support.

RSI strength and dominant long positioning support continuation. However, rising exchange inflows introduce near-term selling risk.

If buyers maintain control and absorb supply, price would likely advance toward $0.0300; otherwise, rejection would trigger a controlled pullback toward $0.02039 support.


Final Summary

  • Sustained strength above resistance would validate continuation, but rising exchange inflows could disrupt bullish structure near-term.
  • Trader positioning remains heavily long, which could accelerate upside if confirmed or trigger sharp downside if invalidated.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price of Monad (MON) and what key resistance level is it testing?

AMonad (MON) is currently trading around $0.02512 and is testing the key resistance/supply zone at $0.0248.

QWhat does the recent +$684K netflow indicate for MON's price action near resistance?

AThe recent +$684K netflow indicates that tokens are moving back onto exchanges, which suggests participants may be preparing to distribute their holdings. This introduces potential selling risk as the price tests a key supply zone.

QWhat is the Long/Short Ratio of Binance top traders and what does it signify?

ABinance top traders have a Long/Short Ratio of approximately 1.33, with long positions at 57.01%. This reflects a clear long bias and strong directional conviction toward further price appreciation.

QWhat is the significance of the RSI level at 61.38 for MON's price movement?

AAn RSI of 61.38 indicates sustained buyer control and structured strength, as it is firmly above the midline but not yet in overbought territory. This leaves room for further upside attempts.

QWhat are the two potential price targets mentioned if MON breaks above or gets rejected at the $0.0248 resistance?

AIf MON breaks above the $0.0248 resistance, the next target is the $0.0300 level. If it gets rejected, a controlled pullback toward the $0.02039 support level is likely.

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片