Injective’s ‘supply squeeze’ clears with 99% vote – What’s next for INJ?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-20Last updated on 2026-01-20

Abstract

Injective's 'supply squeeze' proposal was overwhelmingly approved with 99.89% of the vote. The plan aims to dramatically reduce the INJ token supply by doubling the token burn rate and cutting staking reward emissions in half. This aggressive deflationary upgrade complements the existing community buyback program, which has already removed over 6.8 million tokens from circulation. Despite the bullish tokenomics update, the price reaction was muted. INJ saw a brief 4% rally but gave back gains due to broader market pressures, including a Bitcoin dip. Futures market data showed persistently low demand and negative sentiment, indicating the update was overshadowed by macro conditions. It remains to be seen if the deflationary measures will significantly boost INJ's price long-term.

Injective will move forward with its aggressive deflationary plan. The proposal, dubbed “supply squeeze,” received unanimous approval, with 99.89% voting in favor, the blockchain said in a statement.

The Layer 1 chain added,

“The new chapter of INJ is live now to dramatically reduce the token supply, enabling INJ to become one of the most deflationary assets over time.”

The proposal was first floated on the 16th of January and aimed to offer a complementary but fixed solution to the INJ token’s community buyback program.

According to the proposal, IIP-617, INJ’s total supply reduction rate would be doubled. In other words, the supply reduction would be increased by 100% as part of a “structural upgrade to INJ tokenomics.”

For the unfamiliar, Injective [INJ] debuted with a total supply of 100,000,000 tokens and serves as the governance token for the Injective ecosystem.

Injective’s annual inflation rate or emissions distributed as staking rewards are dynamic and fluctuate between 5% and 10% based on an 85% staking ratio.

In the past, the chain’s deflationary plan involved using collected fees to drive token buybacks. Over 6.8 million INJ tokens have been removed from supply via the buyback program.

But the new plan takes it a notch higher. It will cut emissions by half and increase buybacks to tighten supply.

Will the deflation plan boost INJ’s outlook?

However, the results and views on buyback programs across various chains, such as Hyperliquid [HYPE], Pump.fun, and Jupiter [JUP], have been mixed.

Some bill it as a “token value accrual,” while others, like Jupiter, see it as a waste of resources if the token’s price doesn’t rally.

Whether INJ’s double approach will clear Jupiter’s doubts remains unclear.

In the meantime, INJ tracked broader market sentiment rather than the bullish update.

It rallied 4% after the update but erased some of those gains at the time of writing as Bitcoin [BTC] dipped to $90K following U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Europe.

After slipping below $5, INJ briefly dropped to December lows near $4.4 and may retest support or drop to $4.42 if pressure persists.

Besides, the overall demand on the Futures market remained muted.

Over the past week, Futures CVD (Cumulative Volume Delta), or demand for INJ on the Futures market, became increasingly negative from the 15th of January and dipped even lower despite the ‘supply squeeze’ update.

In fact, even the Open Interest (OI) remained unchanged near $25 million despite the bullish tokenomics update.

Taken together, these data sets showed that broader market sentiment overshadowed the positive INJ development. It remains to be seen whether the price will catch up later.


Final Thoughts

  • Injective approved a plan to cut its dynamic annual emissions, currently 5%-10%, in half.
  • Speculative interest and demand remained low despite a slight 4% bounce after the positive update.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the result of the 'supply squeeze' proposal vote for Injective?

AThe 'supply squeeze' proposal received unanimous approval with 99.89% of the vote in favor.

QWhat is the main goal of Injective's new tokenomics plan, IIP-617?

AThe main goal of IIP-617 is to double the total supply reduction rate of INJ, making it one of the most deflationary assets over time by cutting emissions in half and increasing buybacks.

QHow did the price of INJ react immediately after the proposal update, and what was the broader market influence?

AINJ rallied 4% after the update but then erased some of those gains as Bitcoin dipped to $90K following U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on Europe, showing that broader market sentiment overshadowed the positive news.

QWhat was the trend for INJ's Futures Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) after the proposal?

AThe Futures CVD for INJ became increasingly negative from January 15th and dipped even lower after the 'supply squeeze' update, indicating muted demand in the futures market.

QWhat are the two key takeaways listed in the article's 'Final Thoughts'?

AThe two key takeaways are: 1) Injective approved a plan to cut its dynamic annual emissions (5%-10%) in half, and 2) Speculative interest and demand remained low despite a slight 4% price bounce after the update.

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片