Injective’s ‘supply squeeze’ clears with 99% vote – What’s next for INJ?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-20Last updated on 2026-01-20

Abstract

Injective's 'supply squeeze' proposal was overwhelmingly approved with 99.89% of the vote. The plan aims to dramatically reduce the INJ token supply by doubling the token burn rate and cutting staking reward emissions in half. This aggressive deflationary upgrade complements the existing community buyback program, which has already removed over 6.8 million tokens from circulation. Despite the bullish tokenomics update, the price reaction was muted. INJ saw a brief 4% rally but gave back gains due to broader market pressures, including a Bitcoin dip. Futures market data showed persistently low demand and negative sentiment, indicating the update was overshadowed by macro conditions. It remains to be seen if the deflationary measures will significantly boost INJ's price long-term.

Injective will move forward with its aggressive deflationary plan. The proposal, dubbed “supply squeeze,” received unanimous approval, with 99.89% voting in favor, the blockchain said in a statement.

The Layer 1 chain added,

“The new chapter of INJ is live now to dramatically reduce the token supply, enabling INJ to become one of the most deflationary assets over time.”

The proposal was first floated on the 16th of January and aimed to offer a complementary but fixed solution to the INJ token’s community buyback program.

According to the proposal, IIP-617, INJ’s total supply reduction rate would be doubled. In other words, the supply reduction would be increased by 100% as part of a “structural upgrade to INJ tokenomics.”

For the unfamiliar, Injective [INJ] debuted with a total supply of 100,000,000 tokens and serves as the governance token for the Injective ecosystem.

Injective’s annual inflation rate or emissions distributed as staking rewards are dynamic and fluctuate between 5% and 10% based on an 85% staking ratio.

In the past, the chain’s deflationary plan involved using collected fees to drive token buybacks. Over 6.8 million INJ tokens have been removed from supply via the buyback program.

But the new plan takes it a notch higher. It will cut emissions by half and increase buybacks to tighten supply.

Will the deflation plan boost INJ’s outlook?

However, the results and views on buyback programs across various chains, such as Hyperliquid [HYPE], Pump.fun, and Jupiter [JUP], have been mixed.

Some bill it as a “token value accrual,” while others, like Jupiter, see it as a waste of resources if the token’s price doesn’t rally.

Whether INJ’s double approach will clear Jupiter’s doubts remains unclear.

In the meantime, INJ tracked broader market sentiment rather than the bullish update.

It rallied 4% after the update but erased some of those gains at the time of writing as Bitcoin [BTC] dipped to $90K following U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Europe.

After slipping below $5, INJ briefly dropped to December lows near $4.4 and may retest support or drop to $4.42 if pressure persists.

Besides, the overall demand on the Futures market remained muted.

Over the past week, Futures CVD (Cumulative Volume Delta), or demand for INJ on the Futures market, became increasingly negative from the 15th of January and dipped even lower despite the ‘supply squeeze’ update.

In fact, even the Open Interest (OI) remained unchanged near $25 million despite the bullish tokenomics update.

Taken together, these data sets showed that broader market sentiment overshadowed the positive INJ development. It remains to be seen whether the price will catch up later.


Final Thoughts

  • Injective approved a plan to cut its dynamic annual emissions, currently 5%-10%, in half.
  • Speculative interest and demand remained low despite a slight 4% bounce after the positive update.

Related Questions

QWhat was the result of the 'supply squeeze' proposal vote for Injective?

AThe 'supply squeeze' proposal received unanimous approval with 99.89% of the vote in favor.

QWhat is the main goal of Injective's new tokenomics plan, IIP-617?

AThe main goal of IIP-617 is to double the total supply reduction rate of INJ, making it one of the most deflationary assets over time by cutting emissions in half and increasing buybacks.

QHow did the price of INJ react immediately after the proposal update, and what was the broader market influence?

AINJ rallied 4% after the update but then erased some of those gains as Bitcoin dipped to $90K following U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on Europe, showing that broader market sentiment overshadowed the positive news.

QWhat was the trend for INJ's Futures Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) after the proposal?

AThe Futures CVD for INJ became increasingly negative from January 15th and dipped even lower after the 'supply squeeze' update, indicating muted demand in the futures market.

QWhat are the two key takeaways listed in the article's 'Final Thoughts'?

AThe two key takeaways are: 1) Injective approved a plan to cut its dynamic annual emissions (5%-10%) in half, and 2) Speculative interest and demand remained low despite a slight 4% price bounce after the update.

Related Reads

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

Decoding Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure: The Reality Over the past year, I've been building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, Google, and dozens of startups. A clear conclusion emerges: true, large-scale demand does not yet exist. Startups face structural challenges. Data points illustrate this gap. Stripe's Agent commerce platform has over 1,000 merchants but only single-digit transacting agents. Visa's Agent payment token requires 9-month KYC and a $250M revenue threshold, accessible only to giants like Amazon. On-chain analysis reveals actual daily Agent transaction volume is around $17k, half of which are test transactions. The article analyzes four potential markets: **1. Agent-to-Merchant (A2M):** Current AI shopping UX is often inferior to traditional e-commerce for visual, comparison-heavy purchases (clothing, electronics). Chat interfaces are a step back. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," fearing future obsolescence, not current demand. Potential exists in high-frequency, low-decision purchases (e.g., food delivery) or simplifying terrible UX (complex checkouts, non-native shoppers), but these require massive consumer distribution channels dominated by giants like DoorDash and Amazon. **2. Agent-to-API (A2A):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing for core APIs (compute, data). The argument for micro-payments via crypto for sub-dollar API calls is addressed by pre-paid balances today. The deeper issue is supplier resistance; major SaaS firms rely on enterprise contracts, not fractional cent pricing. Opportunity lies in the long tail of niche services, but this is a smaller market catering to developers, a historically low-paying group. **3. Agent-to-Agent (A2A):** This remains a theoretical long-term vision with near-zero current transaction volume. It involves unique challenges: discovery, trust, negotiation, dispute resolution. When it materializes, it will require a fundamentally new settlement infrastructure for high-speed, variable-value, multi-party transactions. It's a real long-term bet, but not the current market. **4. Agent-to-Finance (A2F):** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors incumbents with regulatory licenses, compliance infrastructure, and existing client relationships. **The Real Issue:** Why is infrastructure still being built? Incumbents can afford long-term bets, and payment companies see every problem as a nail for their payment hammer. However, payment is just one piece. The core challenge is *coordination*—orchestrating work between Agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is part of settlement, which is part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. Startups lack the infinite runway of giants and must find today's real market, which, after a year of exploration, lies outside these four categories—in an area with real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit1h ago

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

marsbit1h ago

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

The article "Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition" explores prediction markets as a focal point of excitement in 2025 for investors, crypto enthusiasts, and media. It traces their intellectual lineage from Friedrich Hayek's ideas on dispersed knowledge and market coordination to Robin Hanson's Logarithmic Market Scoring Rule (LMSR), which incentivizes truthful information sharing. The piece argues that a16z's significant investment in prediction market platform Kalshi (valued at $220B) transcends mere financial speculation. a16z frames prediction markets as a new form of "media" that provides "presence"—a way for individuals to actively engage with and influence world events through financial stakes, countering postmodern detachment. By wagering on outcomes, users become "super observers," and the market's aggregated probabilities gain authoritative power to define event truth and importance. The article uses media company MTS ("Monitoring The Situation") as a case study of a16z's "new media" strategy: rapidly producing high-intensity, multi-format content to "take over the timeline." However, prediction markets like Kalshi are presented as the ultimate piece in this media empire. Their real-money, crowd-sourced probabilities possess a unique "reality distortion field" and perceived objectivity, potentially swaying public opinion and granting a private company unprecedented interpretive power over reality. Ultimately, Kalshi's immense valuation is attributed not just to its exchange model, but to its role as a foundational component in a16z's envisioned new media landscape, where prediction markets define narrative and truth.

链捕手1h ago

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片