Inside Neo Blockchain Fallout: Co-Founders Trade Barbs Over Money and Power

ccn.comPublished on 2025-12-31Last updated on 2025-12-31

Abstract

Neo blockchain co-founders Da Hongfei and Erik Zhang are engaged in a public dispute over financial transparency and governance. Zhang accuses Hongfei of withholding financial reports for years and demands full disclosure of the Neo Foundation's assets and expenditures. He also states that Hongfei will step back from Neo mainnet operations starting January 1, 2026, to focus on side projects. Hongfei counters that Zhang controls the majority of NEO and GAS tokens and has refused to transfer them to multi-signature wallets despite previous agreements. Both claim to act in Neo’s best interests, but the conflict has raised concerns about governance and trust within the community. The disagreement underscores ongoing tensions in the project's management since its rebrand from Antshares in 2017.

Key Takeaways

  • Neo co-founders Erik Zhang and Da Hongfei are publicly fighting over the project’s finances and control.
  • Zhang says Hongfei has kept the finances secret for years and must now share a full report.
  • The argument undermines trust in Neo, with both parties claiming to protect the project.

The Neo blockchain, often referred to as the “Chinese Ethereum” due to its smart contract capabilities and focus on digital assets, has been rocked by a public feud between its co-founders, Da Hongfei and Erik Zhang.

This dispute centers on financial transparency, control over the project’s treasury, and allegations of governance hijacking.

Earn Crypto with These Top Mining Apps
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"}' data-trk="67d19e1ff74d32de176c1b03" href="https://www.miningrigrentals.com?ref=2742248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Mining Rig Rentals<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67d19e1ff74d32de176c1b03" href="https://www.miningrigrentals.com?ref=2742248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Mining Rig Rentals

promotions
Earn a commission on your referral\u2019s transactions.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67d19e1ff74d32de176c1b03" href="https://www.miningrigrentals.com?ref=2742248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Earn a commission on your referral’s transactions.
Coins
6
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="67d19ee2f74d32de176c1b5f" href="https://hashing24.com/?rid=53616c7465645f5fe8657fbf16217f483baff299e53f4db4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Hashing24<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67d19ee2f74d32de176c1b5f" href="https://hashing24.com/?rid=53616c7465645f5fe8657fbf16217f483baff299e53f4db4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Hashing24

promotions
Earn 3-10% on referral purchases<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67d19ee2f74d32de176c1b5f" href="https://hashing24.com/?rid=53616c7465645f5fe8657fbf16217f483baff299e53f4db4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Earn 3-10% on referral purchases
Coins
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="67d1a119f74d32de176c1be1" href="https://accounts.binance.com/en/register?ref=DTDJBNX1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Binance Pool<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67d1a119f74d32de176c1be1" href="https://accounts.binance.com/en/register?ref=DTDJBNX1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Binance Pool

promotions
Sign up, verify, deposit 100 USDT, get 100 USDT bonus<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67d1a119f74d32de176c1be1" href="https://accounts.binance.com/en/register?ref=DTDJBNX1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Sign up, verify, deposit 100 USDT, get 100 USDT bonus
Coins
5
Claim Offer

Chinese Ethereum Killer Controversy

As of Dec. 31, the co-founders had exchanged pointed allegations on X, with each believing the other was to blame for opacity and potential resource waste.

Neo co-founder Erik Zhang accused Da Hongfei of failing to disclose Neo Foundation finances and urged a complete, verifiable report.

He said Hongfei will step back from Neo mainnet work, effective Jan. 1, 2026, to focus on NeoX and SpoonOS.

Hongfei replied that Zhang controls most NEO funds and consensus power, stating that one person should not run the project. He had long pushed for moving NEO/GAS to NF multisig wallets, but Zhang had repeatedly delayed the transfer.

“Before today, I avoided raising this publicly to protect community confidence and to give space for an orderly resolution. That silence was born of the hope that he would honor his promise. That restraint has now been misinterpreted. I should have done this earlier.”

This has sparked concerns about Neo’s future stability, particularly considering its history of pivots from Antshares to Neo, as well as migrations such as N3.

The controversy between the two founders of the popular blockchain network highlights deeper issues in decentralized project management, where personal control over funds can undermine community trust.

Neo’s History

The latest spat between the two co-founders stems from a protracted historical conflict of oversight.

Zhang alleged that Hongfei approached him privately, before 2025, claiming that joint oversight was inefficient and suggesting that one of the founders step down.

The co-founder allegedly agreed to withdraw, believing it would benefit Neo.

Zhang realized that Hongfei was working on AEON, a new blockchain project with its own coin that might potentially utilize Neo’s resources.

This motivated Zhang to return and question what he regarded as a conflict of interest.

According to Zhang, a phone call agreement was reached, where Hongfei would disclose financial reports and shift focus to side projects, such as NeoX, a cross-chain bridge, and SpoonOS, an operating system layer for Neo.

Erik posts publicly on Dec. 31, accusing Da of failing to honor the agreement. He demands the immediate disclosure of NF assets and expenditures, stating that Da will no longer handle Neo mainnet matters as of Jan. 1, 2026.

Da responds, countering that Erik controls the “super majority” of NEO/GAS in personal custody, refusing to transfer to multisig wallets despite promises. Da pledges a full 2025 financial report in Q1 2026 and vows to pursue treasury transfer through “all available remedies.

Da Hongfei and Erik Zhang established Antshares in 2014, which was later rebranded to Neo in 2017 amid China’s blockchain boom. Da Hongfei, who is sometimes referred to as the public face, has prioritized company development, collaborations, and ecosystem expansion.

The current spat revolves around the NF’s treasury—estimated to include significant NEO/GAS holdings and allegations that one founder has monopolized access, leading to a “black box” of unaccounted expenditures.

Community sentiment reflects displeasure with both parties for undermining confidence. Users and analysts describe it as a “governance breakdown” and a “trainwreck,” seeking rapid disclosures to restore credibility.

Some note danger signals, such as blocked access to reports, which mimic bigger blockchain governance flaws encountered in projects like Mantra DAO.

Top Picks for Ethereum
  • Best Exchanges for Ethereum Get A Great Offer When You Join These Exchanges
  • Buy Ethereum Fast & Easy How To Buy Ethereum With a Credit Card Now
  • Best Online Casinos for Ethereum See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main issue causing the public feud between Neo's co-founders, Da Hongfei and Erik Zhang?

AThe main issue is a dispute over financial transparency and control of the Neo Foundation's treasury, with accusations of secret finances and governance hijacking.

QWhat specific action did Erik Zhang demand from Da Hongfei regarding the Neo Foundation's finances?

AErik Zhang demanded that Da Hongfei immediately share a full and verifiable financial report of the Neo Foundation's assets and expenditures.

QAccording to Da Hongfei's counter-argument, what control does Erik Zhang have over the project's assets?

ADa Hongfei stated that Erik Zhang controls a 'super majority' of NEO and GAS tokens in personal custody and has refused to transfer them to multi-signature wallets as promised.

QWhat change in Da Hongfei's role did Erik Zhang announce, effective January 1, 2026?

AErik Zhang announced that Da Hongfei would step back from working on the Neo mainnet to focus on side projects, namely NeoX and SpoonOS.

QHow has the community reacted to the public dispute between the two Neo co-founders?

AThe community has reacted with displeasure, describing the situation as a 'governance breakdown' and a 'trainwreck' that undermines trust, and is calling for rapid disclosures to restore credibility.

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit3h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy NEO

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing NEO (NEO) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy NEO (NEO) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your NEO (NEO)After purchasing your NEO (NEO), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade NEO (NEO)Easily trade NEO (NEO) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

2.0k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy NEO

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of NEO (NEO) are presented below.

活动图片