SEC commissioner says Crypto is ‘helping to nudge reassessment’ on privacy

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-15Last updated on 2025-12-15

Abstract

SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce stated that cryptocurrency is prompting a reassessment of financial privacy regulations during a roundtable discussion with industry leaders. The event, part of the SEC’s efforts to shape digital asset oversight, addressed balancing investor protection with privacy as blockchain-based finance grows. Peirce and other regulators acknowledged that while public blockchains increase transparency, they also drive demand for privacy tools. The discussion included representatives from Zcash, the Blockchain Association, and the Crypto Council for Innovation. Meanwhile, U.S. Senate efforts to pass comprehensive digital asset market structure legislation before 2026 face time constraints, with a key bill unlikely to advance before the year-end recess.

Regulators at the US Securities and Exchange Commission met with cryptocurrency industry leaders on Monday to discuss financial surveillance and user privacy, as part of the agency’s ongoing efforts to shape digital asset oversight.

In opening remarks at the roundtable, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, who also heads the agency’s crypto task force, joined Chair Paul Atkins and Commissioner Mark Uyeda in outlining how regulators could balance investor protection with privacy considerations as blockchain-based financial activity expands.

Atkins said crypto had the potential to become “the most powerful financial surveillance architecture ever invented,” depending on how the US government handled regulation. He cited the SEC’s previous approach, “treating every wallet like a broker,” requiring more transactions to be reported.

SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce addressing the roundtable on Monday. Source: SEC

Peirce echoed Atkins in her statement, suggesting that regulators need to “rethink when and how financial transactions are surveilled” as the crypto market grows.

“Our national degradation of financial privacy and the rules that embody it are overdue for a change, and crypto is helping to nudge a reassessment,” said Peirce, adding that crypto “opens new possibilities for transactions without financial intermediaries that are central to our existing financial surveillance paradigm [...].” She continued:

“On the other hand, as has been mentioned, the public blockchains on which many crypto transactions take place are viewable by everyone, which creates a demand for privacy-protecting tools.”

The surveillance and privacy roundtable, which included representatives from the privacy token Zcash (ZEC), the Blockchain Association and the Crypto Council for Innovation, was the task force’s sixth event discussing various aspects of digital asset regulation and policy since Peirce launched the group in January.

Many in the cryptocurrency industry have sounded the alarm about privacy as the market continues to grow and regulators, lawmakers and courts work to address concerns.

Related: US SEC’s Crenshaw takes aim at crypto in final weeks at agency

Market structure to revamp the SEC’s authority over digital assets

Amid the roundtable discussion and the imminent departure of SEC Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw, lawmakers in the US Senate are running out of time to address legislation to establish a comprehensive digital asset market structure before 2026.

Early drafts of the bill indicated that it could grant the Commodity Futures Trading Commission greater authority over cryptocurrency and alter the SEC’s regulatory priorities.

After a market structure bill, named the CLARITY Act, passed the House of Representatives in July, members of the US Senate have been engaged in negotiations to get the legislation onto the floor for a vote before the end of the year. As of Monday, this goal by Republican leaders appeared unlikely to be achieved.

The Senate Banking Committee and the Senate Agriculture Committee have both released discussion drafts of their respective versions of the bill. However, as of the time of publication, no markup hearing appeared on the banking committee’s schedule, with the chamber set to break for the holidays in the next few days.

Magazine: When privacy and AML laws conflict: Crypto projects’ impossible choice

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit3h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy MET

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Meteora (MET) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Meteora (MET) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Meteora (MET)After purchasing your Meteora (MET), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Meteora (MET)Easily trade Meteora (MET) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.1k Total ViewsPublished 2025.10.24Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy MET

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MET (MET) are presented below.

活动图片