FLOKI’s bull trap plays out! Memecoin drops 13% in 36 hours

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-10-21Last updated on 2025-10-22

Key Takeaways

What sparked FLOKI’s bull trap?

The bullish move for Bitcoin gave the altcoin market short-term confidence, and its quick retreat swung the sentiment bearishly, taking FLOKI traders on a volatile ride.

What’s next for FLOKI?

The on-chain metrics did not reveal significant accumulation from holders. Combined with its recent bearish momentum, bulls should not bet on a recovery just yet.


The Open Interest behind FLOKI [FLOKI] saw a triple-digit percentage jump on the 21st of October.

Together with sizeable derivative inflows, the signs appeared to point toward strong bullish momentum, but AMBCrypto reported that a bull trap for FLOKI was possible.

The memecoin did indeed see its short-term bullishness fade after the 40% rally. In the 36 hours prior to the time of writing, FLOKI has shed 13.4% in value, failing to scale the local supply zone at $0.000084.

The rejection came on the back of heightened volatility for Bitcoin [BTC]. Crypto analyst Axel Adler Jr observed that the Bitcoin volatility index rose above 95% for the third time within a month.

It was a warning sign that traders should expect sharp price moves.

FLOKI 1-day ChartFLOKI 1-day Chart

Source: FLOKI/USDT on TradingView

This helped explain the bull trap that FLOKI witnessed in the past 36 hours. Despite the rejection at the supply zone at $0.0084, the market structure of FLOKI on the 1-day chart was bullish.

This internal structure shift came after the local swing high at $0.0000785 was breached during Monday’s rally. However, the Awesome Oscillator continued to flash bearish momentum.

The A/D volume indicator showed buying pressure was neither powerful nor consistent enough to force an uptrend from here.

While the internal structure shift was a bullish outcome, swing traders must remain wary of going long.

On-chain metrics signal more trouble for FLOKI bulls

Floki SantimentFloki Santiment

Source: Santiment

The mean coin age saw an abrupt drop on the 11th of October, after the massive liquidation cascade on the 10th of October. The dormant circulation also saw a huge spike.

Together, they showed a high amount of token movement between wallets, a classic sign of a wave of selling.

Over the past few days, even though the daily active addresses metric has picked up, the mean coin age has remained flat.

This showed that a network-wide accumulation phase was not underway. It reinforced the idea that FLOKI bulls should remain cautious.

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Investors Begin 'Switching Tables'

Investors Begin to “Change Tables” A notable shift is occurring in China's venture capital landscape. While the hard tech sector, especially AI, experiences a funding frenzy with record-breaking investment rounds, many investors are opting to leave traditional investment firms to join portfolio companies. This movement, termed "changing tables," marks a departure from past downturns where such moves were often a last resort. Currently, the trend is driven by proactive choice. Seasoned investors, including partners and managing directors, are being lured by attractive salaries, equity incentives, and core roles like VP, General Manager, or even co-founder at fast-growing startups in hot sectors like AI, embodied intelligence, and aerospace. This "going ashore" to companies is seen as a strategic career move. The shift is a two-way street. Booming fundraising and feverish investment activity have created intense competition among VCs for a narrow set of "star projects." Simultaneously, these high-flying tech companies, engaged in rapid, multi-round financing, urgently need talent with deep capital market expertise and institutional connections to manage their complex funding needs. Companies like Zhiyuan Robot, MoonDark AI, and MiniMax are actively recruiting from investment firms. For investors, the move also reflects concerns about the sustainability of the current market. Risks like valuation inversion between primary and secondary markets, high IPO破发 rates, increased regulatory scrutiny, and the uncertainty of eventual exits are prompting a reevaluation of the traditional VC path. While this transition offers new opportunities, it is not without challenges. Success requires adapting from evaluating companies to operating within one, focusing on execution over analysis. Nevertheless, this trend underscores the expanding career boundaries and fluidity within China's innovation ecosystem.

marsbit16m ago

Investors Begin 'Switching Tables'

marsbit16m ago

Ethereum Community in Uproar! Whose Cake is EIP-8363 Cutting Into?

**Ethereum Community Debates Controversial Staking Proposal EIP-8363** A new Ethereum proposal, EIP-8363, dubbed "Tapered Issuance Burn," has ignited heated debate within the community. The core idea is to reduce and eventually eliminate new issuance rewards for validators as the total amount of staked ETH approaches 50% of the total supply (around 60.25 million ETH). The authors, including EthCC founder Jérôme de Tychey and Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake, argue the current system perpetually incentivizes more staking, potentially leading to centralization as stake flows to large custodians and liquid staking tokens (LSTs). They also aim to reduce dilution pressure on non-staking ETH holders. Under the proposal, validator rewards from consensus-layer issuance would be partially burned based on a formula tied to the total staked amount. Net rewards would gradually approach zero as staking nears the 50% threshold. Notably, execution-layer rewards (tips, MEV) are unaffected. A proposed 18-month transition period would soften the initial impact. The community reaction has been predominantly critical. Key concerns include: * **Centralization Risk:** Critics like Obol's Oisín Kyne argue very low rewards could drive out solo stakers and smaller operators, leaving only large, cost-insensitive institutions, thus increasing validator centralization. * **Ecosystem Impact:** Aave's Stani Kulechov warns it could hurt ETH's predictable yield appeal for institutions and compress yields for LST-based DeFi strategies (e.g., recursive lending). * **Process & Timing:** Some, like ether.fi's Mike Silagadze, criticize the proposal's late submission ahead of a key upgrade deadline, limiting discussion time. Supporters believe the change is necessary to maintain ETH as a neutral reserve asset and avoid excessive security costs and holder dilution. If implemented, solo stakers would face higher relative operational costs and longer recovery times from penalties. LST yields would converge with native ETH, challenging their value proposition. The entire DeFi interest rate ecosystem, built around staking yield, could be pressured. While all ETH holders would benefit from reduced dilution, the net effect on ETH's price and adoption remains uncertain due to potential demand-side impacts from lower yields. The proposal is currently an early-stage draft and has not been officially slated for inclusion in any upcoming network upgrade.

marsbit46m ago

Ethereum Community in Uproar! Whose Cake is EIP-8363 Cutting Into?

marsbit46m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片