Tokenization arrives onchain for institutions — AMA recap with Redbelly Network

cointelegraph發佈於 2025-12-18更新於 2025-12-18

文章摘要

Sponsored content: During a Cointelegraph AMA, Redbelly Network and AMAL Trustees discussed how tokenization and deterministic finality can modernize institutional asset workflows, moving beyond manual processes like spreadsheets and delayed reconciliations. The conversation highlighted the shift from experimental pilots to production-grade tokenization infrastructure, particularly in regulated markets and private credit. A key focus was Project Acacia, a Reserve Bank of Australia CBDC pilot, where a smart asset-backed security demonstrated streamlined issuance, servicing, and secondary trading on a single source of truth. Redbelly's deterministic consensus ensures irreversible settlement and high throughput, while its zkIdentity system enables compliance checks without exposing private data. The partnership aims to upgrade asset lifecycle management by combining Redbelly's technical infrastructure with AMAL's fiduciary expertise.

Sponsored Content

Routing trillions in assets through spreadsheets and monthly reconciliations creates delays, blind spots and operational risk. During a recent Cointelegraph AMA, Alan Burt, executive chairman of Redbelly Network, and Luke Andersen, chief product officer at AMAL Trustees, outlined how tokenization and deterministic finality can streamline these workflows without breaking existing fiduciary responsibilities.

“It’s 2025 — institutions should not be relying on email-based confirmations and delayed reconciliations when assets and cash move,” Andersen said, stressing that infrastructure must now match the scale and speed of capital markets.

From experiments to an endorsed infrastructure

The discussion began with an overview of the state of institutional tokenization. Over the past two years, administrators, asset servicers and central banks have moved from lab pilots to production-grade initiatives. For Redbelly, the focus is on regulated markets and private credit, where much of the infrastructure still runs on siloed databases and manual processes.

Burt explained that Redbelly set out to bring “all the lovely things we like in permissionless DeFi” to regulated environments, with an identity and custody layer that enables collateral mobility under existing rules. He pointed to private credit and alternative assets as a starting point, where tokenization can structure workflows and prepare assets for broader distribution over time.

Andersen added that for AMAL and IQ-EQ, tokenization has shifted from an innovation theme to a board-level agenda: “Tokenization is no longer treated as a moonshot experiment, but a strategic infrastructure upgrade that C-suite and board committees are actively exploring.”

Project Acacia: smart ABS and CBDC settlement on a public chain

A central part of the AMA focused on Project Acacia, the Reserve Bank of Australia’s CBDC pilot, where Redbelly and AMAL/IQ-EQ implemented a smart asset-backed security (ABS). The goal was to show how tokenized assets and wholesale CBDC can simplify issuance, servicing, reporting and secondary trading.

Burt walked through the current flow in securitization: an originator runs a loan book, a bank provides warehouse funding and a trustee then manages payments to multiple investor tranches. Each party maintains separate systems and reconciles data every month. In Project Acacia, the underlying loans, the ABS structure and secondary trading all moved to a shared infrastructure.

“What this allowed us to do is connect the originator, the warehouse and the trustee on a single source of truth, and then add secondary trading on the Australian Bond Exchange,” Burt said. “You know exactly what you’re holding and can see through to the underlying assets before you price or impair it.”

Andersen described the pilot as a proof point for the trustee’s role in tokenized markets, showing how fiduciary oversight and digital execution can coexist. Securitization still relies on trust law and investor protection, but tokenization compresses timelines, reduces manual breakpoints and replaces document-driven flows with embedded rules, eligibility checks and deterministic settlement.

Deterministic finality, zkIdentity and a shared control layer

The AMA then turned to infrastructure requirements and risk management. For institutions, throughput alone is not enough; they need predictable costs, audit-ready accountability and guarantees that every transaction resolves in a single, irreversible state.

Burt explained Redbelly’s deterministic consensus and fixed gas model, which are designed for capital markets workloads. All validator nodes propose transactions to each other and agree on a combined “super block” before it is committed, which removes forks and reorganizes risk. This approach, developed through research at the University of Sydney and the CSIRO, Australia’s national research lab and backed by a patent, has been benchmarked at over 97,000 transactions per second with zero transaction loss under stress tests.

“We believe settlement is the core competency of the network,” Burt said. “Institutions need to know that once a block is created, there are no rollbacks, and that each transaction executes in the right sequence.”

Both speakers highlighted Redbelly’s zkIdentity system as another key piece. Rather than duplicating KYC and eligibility checks at every venue, users receive verifiable credentials that prove, in zero-knowledge, that they meet requirements for a given product or jurisdiction. Eligibility is checked at the network layer, while underlying data remains private and issuers still operate within their licences.

For AMAL/IQ-EQ, this addresses a structural compliance problem. Andersen noted: “zkIdentity lets us verify eligibility at the network layer without exposing private data, which enables regulated markets to operate on public rails while keeping controls and safeguards in place.”

The partnership between Redbelly and AMAL/IQ-EQ combines this technical foundation with existing licences, balance sheet strength and established transaction flows. AMAL Trustees brings the fiduciary role, legal enforceability and reporting obligations; Redbelly provides the shared ledger, deterministic settlement and identity layer. Together, they position tokenization as an upgrade to the way asset lifecycles are managed and funded.

相關問答

QWhat is the main problem that tokenization and deterministic finality aim to solve for institutional asset management?

AThey aim to solve the problems of delays, blind spots, and operational risk caused by routing trillions in assets through spreadsheets, email-based confirmations, and manual monthly reconciliations.

QAccording to the AMA, how has the perception of tokenization changed at institutions like AMAL and IQ-EQ?

ATokenization has shifted from being treated as a moonshot experiment to a strategic infrastructure upgrade that is now a board-level agenda, with C-suite and board committees actively exploring it.

QWhat was the goal of Project Acacia, the pilot project with the Reserve Bank of Australia?

AThe goal was to demonstrate how tokenized assets and a wholesale CBDC can simplify the issuance, servicing, reporting, and secondary trading of a smart asset-backed security (ABS) on a shared infrastructure.

QWhat are two key technical features of the Redbelly Network that make it suitable for institutional use?

ATwo key features are its deterministic consensus mechanism, which provides irreversible settlement and removes fork risk, and its zkIdentity system, which allows for verifiable eligibility checks without exposing private user data.

QHow does the partnership between Redbelly Network and AMAL/IQ-EQ combine their respective strengths?

AThe partnership combines Redbelly's technical foundation (shared ledger, deterministic settlement, identity layer) with AMAL/IQ-EQ's existing licenses, balance sheet strength, established transaction flows, fiduciary role, legal enforceability, and reporting obligations.

你可能也喜歡

从SpaceX到贸易发票:通证化如何改变全球资金流动方式

你是否想过,如果一条WhatsApp消息需要经过验证、盖章和三个不同阶段清算,两天后才送达,会有多糟糕?我们期待实时通讯,为何对金融市场没有同样的期待?如今,买卖股票通常意味着先卖出、等待结算、然后才能再买入。但代币化股票可能改变这一切。 代币化趋势因SpaceX创纪录的750亿美元IPO而进入主流视野。此后,区块链平台开始提供SpaceX及英伟达、谷歌等知名公司的代币化资产,显示市场对通过区块链获取传统资产的需求增长。纳斯达克也向SEC申请批准在其交易所进行代币化证券交易,表明这一转变已不限于加密原生平台。 代币化股票本质上仍是股票,只是存在于区块链上。其公司、价值和权利与传统股票无异,但交易方式变了:可全天候交易、秒级结算、可拆分以降低投资门槛,并能跨境转移而无须依赖传统多层中介。虽然股票是当前焦点,但代币化正扩展至其他资产类别。据RWA.xyz数据,链上私人信贷已从约50亿美元增长至超100亿美元,房地产、大宗商品和结构化债务也在逐步上链。这些资产类别总值达数百万亿美元。 然而,并非所有区块链都适合机构级结算。许多公链优先考虑开放市场活动,费用波动和结算时间不定是可接受的折衷。但受监管的代币化需要可预测的费用、确定的结算和银行级基础设施——这正是大多数公链所缺乏的。XDC网络专注于此,早在代币化股票受关注前就提供了机构级代币化能力。该网络已处理超11亿美元代币化应收账款、私人信贷和大宗商品。例如在巴西,Liqi Digital Assets报告称,到2026年初其累计代币化信贷操作达12亿巴西雷亚尔(约2.3亿美元)。 XDC网络联合创始人Atul Khekade指出,代币化讨论多集中于本就易于流动的资产,更难的是那些从未可及的资产。这些市场规模大得多,基础设施差距是当前的主要障碍。我们正处于真正的“代币化十年”的开端,而非尾声。 BCG和Ripple预测,到2033年代币化资产市场规模将达18.9万亿美元。渣打银行预计,若计入跨境信贷,2034年将达30万亿美元。实现这些目标的关键在于基础设施——哪些网络能处理巨大体量、满足合规要求并符合尚未上链市场的机构预期。 监管环境也在转向支持。巴西、新加坡、英国和欧盟均已建立法律框架,赋予代币化金融工具正式地位。美国2025年7月通过的《GENIUS法案》为支付稳定币建立了联邦基础设施。焦点已不再是代币化是否被允许,而是其规模化应用的速度。 SpaceX的IPO让代币化有了一个标志性时刻,但支持其规模化的基础设施并非一夜建成。它是在市场那些未曾成为新闻的角落,历经多年构建起来的。这正是未来十年金融体系的运行基础。

ambcrypto36 分鐘前

从SpaceX到贸易发票:通证化如何改变全球资金流动方式

ambcrypto36 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片