# VCs的所有文章

在 HTX 新聞中心流覽與「VCs」相關的最新資訊與深度分析。潘蓋市場趨勢、專案動態、技術進展及監管政策,提供權威的加密行業洞察。

VCs 'Eat the Meat', Retail Investors 'Wash the Dishes': Is the Crypto Plot About to Unfold in the U.S. Stock Market?

VC "Eat the Meat," Retail Investors "Wash the Dishes": Is the Crypto Plot Repeating in US Stocks? The article argues that the US public equity market is increasingly failing to provide retail investors with access to high-growth, transformative companies. Historically, public markets allowed average citizens to participate in wealth creation by investing in early-stage companies like Apple and AOL, which generated life-changing returns. However, a significant trend of companies staying private for extended periods has emerged. This delays their IPOs until most of their explosive growth has already been captured by venture capital (VC) firms and private investors. As a result, by the time companies like Uber or OpenAI go public, their valuations are already extremely high (e.g., Uber at $89B, OpenAI targeting $830B), leaving minimal growth potential for public market participants. This system excludes the median American household, which is legally barred from private market investments, from profiting from the very companies they help build through consumption and labor. The author warns this dynamic creates a "K-shaped economy," exacerbating wealth inequality and risks reverting capitalism to a "neo-feudalism" where a small elite controls the new means of production (equity in transformative companies). The number of US public companies has halved since 1996, while the economy has grown, indicating a systemic shift. The public markets risk becoming merely a liquidity tool for VCs to exit mature investments, undermining the social contract that allowed broader societal participation in wealth creation.

marsbit01/24 05:43

VCs 'Eat the Meat', Retail Investors 'Wash the Dishes': Is the Crypto Plot About to Unfold in the U.S. Stock Market?

marsbit01/24 05:43

The Divergence in Value Logic Between Eastern and Western Crypto KOLs

The article explores the fundamental differences in value logic between Eastern and Western crypto KOLs. The author, drawing from experience with venture capitalists in both regions, observes that Eastern perspectives focus heavily on practical, tactical aspects of projects—such as revenue models, tokenomics, and operational logistics—treating crypto ventures like traditional businesses. In contrast, Western narratives prioritize grand, aspirational stories capable of promising 10x to 100x returns, often glossing over practical details to attract major capital. This divergence leads to opposing definitions of "key opinion." Eastern KOLs tend to deconstruct and critically analyze, while Western ones build on ambitious, high-concept narratives aimed at securing large-scale investments. The author notes that although the most influential narratives and capital formations often originate from the West (e.g., restaking, Rollup, FHE), many of the industry’s most profitable ventures (like CEXs, DEXs, payment systems) are dominated by Eastern players. Structural factors, such as lower capital costs in the West due to institutional backing, and cultural differences—Eastern societies being more pragmatic and battle-tested—contribute to this divide. The author concludes that Eastern KOLs shouldn’t be seen as "degenerate" but as fundamentally oppositional in approach. Success, they argue, lies in challenging Western narratives with Eastern value logic, forcing the global conversation to engage with a more grounded, critical perspective.

marsbit01/16 10:06

The Divergence in Value Logic Between Eastern and Western Crypto KOLs

marsbit01/16 10:06

活动图片