Morgan Stanley Initiates Bitcoin Miner Coverage, Rates Cipher and TeraWulf Overweight, Marathon Underweight

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-02-10更新於 2026-02-10

文章摘要

Morgan Stanley has initiated coverage on major Bitcoin miners, framing them as infrastructure businesses rather than pure cryptocurrency plays. The bank assigned Overweight ratings to Cipher Mining and TeraWulf, citing their potential to transition into stable utility-like companies through long-term power contracts and site leasing—particularly to AI tenants. Cipher is seen as well-positioned for a potential “REIT endgame,” while TeraWulf’s management experience in power and infrastructure supports its positive outlook. In contrast, Marathon Digital received an Underweight rating due to its heavy dependence on Bitcoin price volatility, mining difficulty, and energy costs, making it a higher-risk investment. Morgan Stanley emphasizes that the infrastructure model offers more predictable income and deserves higher valuation multiples.

Morgan Stanley has started formally analyzing the three major publicly traded Bitcoin miners. They argued that these miners should not be viewed as a cryptocurrency bet; instead, they should be valued as an infrastructure business. The bank has given overweight ratings on Cipher Mining and Terawulf, while giving Marathon Digital an underweight rating.

Morgan Stanley believes that once the mining company starts building large, powered sites and signing long-term contracts with customers, it starts looking like a real utility and infrastructure company. Infrastructure investors usually pay higher valuations because income is predictable and contracted with less dependence on the bitcoin value.

Why Cipher and TeraWulf Seem to be Positive

Morgan Stanley says Cipher is well-positioned for what he called a “REIT endgame.” If the Cipher leases its building and power capacity to the AI instead of mining, then risk drops, and valuation could increase. Morgan Stanley sees more upside if the transaction happens.

TeraWulf also received a similar positive rating because the management has deep power and infrastructure experience, with the company already having a history of signing hosting and data center agreements. The analyst believes that future sites can be converted from mining to AI tenants.

Why is Morgan Stanley Cautious on Marathon Digital

For Marathon Digital, Stanley took a different position. Morgan Stanley says that the MARA behaves mainly like the bitcoin price vehicle, and it actively tries to increase BTC exposure. So its stock performance depends heavily on the difficulty, power costs, and BTC price swings. Morgan Stanley warns that mining profitability faces pressure from competition and rising energy demands.

These reports arrive when the investors are debating the future identity of Bitcoin miners. Morgan Stanley replies with its report to all the investors that the infrastructure model gives more stability and deserves a higher value than pure mining.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Dogecoin Price Shows Mixed Signals as Key Technical Levels Are Tested

TagsCipher MiningJPMorganMarathon

相關問答

QWhat is Morgan Stanley's main argument regarding the valuation of major Bitcoin miners?

AMorgan Stanley argues that Bitcoin miners should not be viewed as a cryptocurrency bet but should be valued as infrastructure businesses, as they build large powered sites and sign long-term contracts, making them similar to utility companies.

QWhich two Bitcoin mining companies received an 'overweight' rating from Morgan Stanley?

ACipher Mining and TeraWulf received overweight ratings from Morgan Stanley.

QWhy does Morgan Stanley view Cipher Mining positively, specifically mentioning a 'REIT endgame'?

AMorgan Stanley views Cipher positively because it is well-positioned for a 'REIT endgame,' where leasing its building and power capacity to AI instead of mining would reduce risk and increase valuation.

QWhat is the reason for Morgan Stanley's cautious (underweight) rating on Marathon Digital?

AMorgan Stanley is cautious on Marathon Digital because it behaves mainly as a Bitcoin price vehicle, actively increasing BTC exposure, making its stock performance heavily dependent on mining difficulty, power costs, and BTC price swings, with profitability facing competition and rising energy demands.

QAccording to the report, what advantage does the infrastructure model offer to investors?

AThe infrastructure model offers more stability and deserves a higher valuation because income is predictable and contracted, with less dependence on the value of Bitcoin.

你可能也喜歡

股票跌得比加密货币还狠,钱去了哪?

7月底,韩国Kospi指数罕见连续两天触发熔断,全球半导体股集体暴跌。SK海力士业绩虽创纪录但不及预期,股价重挫,其两倍做多杠杆ETF市值更蒸发超万亿港元。与此同时,比特币却从低点反弹约15%,呈现“股票跌出币圈样,比特币装死躺赢”的反常局面。 此次暴跌并非全市场恐慌,而是对前期最拥挤交易(如AI半导体)的精准去杠杆。催化剂包括不及预期的财报、中国存储芯片扩产带来的竞争压力,以及日元套息交易平仓带来的流动性压力。分析认为,产业逻辑未死,死的是过高的杠杆。 那么,从股市流出的资金是否流入了比特币?答案是否定的。比特币的相对抗跌,是因为它在5月至6月已提前经历大幅调整,美国现货比特币ETF曾出现历史性资金外流。真正的避险资金流向了黄金。数据显示,比特币与黄金的相关性已降至极低水平,“数字黄金”叙事在此次危机中暂时失效。机构将两者视为不同资产:黄金用于避险,比特币用于博弈高波动回报。 资金未来的流向取决于三个条件:全球流动性压力缓解、美联储在不引发衰退的前提下降息,以及美国CLARITY加密法案的最终落地。当前,比特币与纳斯达克指数的走势正在脱钩,其价格更依赖全球流动性而非单一科技股盈利。这种低相关性可能使其在未来成为机构资产配置中分散风险的选择。尽管当前并非避风港,但比特币已提前出清,为未来资本重新配置占据了有利位置。

marsbit4 分鐘前

股票跌得比加密货币还狠,钱去了哪?

marsbit4 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片