Morgan Stanley Initiates Bitcoin Miner Coverage, Rates Cipher and TeraWulf Overweight, Marathon Underweight

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-02-10更新於 2026-02-10

文章摘要

Morgan Stanley has initiated coverage on major Bitcoin miners, framing them as infrastructure businesses rather than pure cryptocurrency plays. The bank assigned Overweight ratings to Cipher Mining and TeraWulf, citing their potential to transition into stable utility-like companies through long-term power contracts and site leasing—particularly to AI tenants. Cipher is seen as well-positioned for a potential “REIT endgame,” while TeraWulf’s management experience in power and infrastructure supports its positive outlook. In contrast, Marathon Digital received an Underweight rating due to its heavy dependence on Bitcoin price volatility, mining difficulty, and energy costs, making it a higher-risk investment. Morgan Stanley emphasizes that the infrastructure model offers more predictable income and deserves higher valuation multiples.

Morgan Stanley has started formally analyzing the three major publicly traded Bitcoin miners. They argued that these miners should not be viewed as a cryptocurrency bet; instead, they should be valued as an infrastructure business. The bank has given overweight ratings on Cipher Mining and Terawulf, while giving Marathon Digital an underweight rating.

Morgan Stanley believes that once the mining company starts building large, powered sites and signing long-term contracts with customers, it starts looking like a real utility and infrastructure company. Infrastructure investors usually pay higher valuations because income is predictable and contracted with less dependence on the bitcoin value.

Why Cipher and TeraWulf Seem to be Positive

Morgan Stanley says Cipher is well-positioned for what he called a “REIT endgame.” If the Cipher leases its building and power capacity to the AI instead of mining, then risk drops, and valuation could increase. Morgan Stanley sees more upside if the transaction happens.

TeraWulf also received a similar positive rating because the management has deep power and infrastructure experience, with the company already having a history of signing hosting and data center agreements. The analyst believes that future sites can be converted from mining to AI tenants.

Why is Morgan Stanley Cautious on Marathon Digital

For Marathon Digital, Stanley took a different position. Morgan Stanley says that the MARA behaves mainly like the bitcoin price vehicle, and it actively tries to increase BTC exposure. So its stock performance depends heavily on the difficulty, power costs, and BTC price swings. Morgan Stanley warns that mining profitability faces pressure from competition and rising energy demands.

These reports arrive when the investors are debating the future identity of Bitcoin miners. Morgan Stanley replies with its report to all the investors that the infrastructure model gives more stability and deserves a higher value than pure mining.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Dogecoin Price Shows Mixed Signals as Key Technical Levels Are Tested

TagsCipher MiningJPMorganMarathon

相關問答

QWhat is Morgan Stanley's main argument regarding the valuation of major Bitcoin miners?

AMorgan Stanley argues that Bitcoin miners should not be viewed as a cryptocurrency bet but should be valued as infrastructure businesses, as they build large powered sites and sign long-term contracts, making them similar to utility companies.

QWhich two Bitcoin mining companies received an 'overweight' rating from Morgan Stanley?

ACipher Mining and TeraWulf received overweight ratings from Morgan Stanley.

QWhy does Morgan Stanley view Cipher Mining positively, specifically mentioning a 'REIT endgame'?

AMorgan Stanley views Cipher positively because it is well-positioned for a 'REIT endgame,' where leasing its building and power capacity to AI instead of mining would reduce risk and increase valuation.

QWhat is the reason for Morgan Stanley's cautious (underweight) rating on Marathon Digital?

AMorgan Stanley is cautious on Marathon Digital because it behaves mainly as a Bitcoin price vehicle, actively increasing BTC exposure, making its stock performance heavily dependent on mining difficulty, power costs, and BTC price swings, with profitability facing competition and rising energy demands.

QAccording to the report, what advantage does the infrastructure model offer to investors?

AThe infrastructure model offers more stability and deserves a higher valuation because income is predictable and contracted, with less dependence on the value of Bitcoin.

你可能也喜歡

众议院委员会公布七项加密税草案——对数字资产征税方式的重大改革

美国众议院筹款委员会发布了七份加密税收讨论草案,旨在为国内数字资产投资者的税收提供更清晰的结构。此举意在澄清关于征税时机和处理的规则,这些领域此前常令投资者和税务专业人士难以将新情况纳入旧框架。 据彭博社报道,筹款委员会主席杰森·史密斯已将建立更清晰的数字资产税收框架列为委员会首要任务之一。这些草案是首个获得国会两院税务委员会领导层支持的努力。草案涵盖了一系列问题,包括通过挖矿产生的数字代币或通过质押获得的奖励应在何时征税。委员会也在考虑为某些稳定币交易提供潜在的税收处理指引,包括某些交易是否可免除资本利得税。 俄克拉荷马州共和党议员、委员会成员凯文·赫恩指出,解决质押和加密货币挖矿的税收时机和处理方式是委员会希望解决的核心问题。草案还将把“虚假交易”限制规则扩展到数字资产,防止投资者在短时间内出售并回购实质上相似的资产以申报税收损失。 加州议员、税收小组委员会首席民主党人迈克·汤普森上月表示,立法者必须权衡“立法的风险与不立法的风险”。美国财政部、商务部及白宫已参与相关讨论。参议院方面,两党高层税务立法者据称也在制定自己的数字资产税收立法,表明两院正趋向更统一的方法,尽管细节可能仍有差异。

bitcoinist7 小時前

众议院委员会公布七项加密税草案——对数字资产征税方式的重大改革

bitcoinist7 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片