Morgan Stanley Initiates Bitcoin Miner Coverage, Rates Cipher and TeraWulf Overweight, Marathon Underweight

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-02-10更新於 2026-02-10

文章摘要

Morgan Stanley has initiated coverage on major Bitcoin miners, framing them as infrastructure businesses rather than pure cryptocurrency plays. The bank assigned Overweight ratings to Cipher Mining and TeraWulf, citing their potential to transition into stable utility-like companies through long-term power contracts and site leasing—particularly to AI tenants. Cipher is seen as well-positioned for a potential “REIT endgame,” while TeraWulf’s management experience in power and infrastructure supports its positive outlook. In contrast, Marathon Digital received an Underweight rating due to its heavy dependence on Bitcoin price volatility, mining difficulty, and energy costs, making it a higher-risk investment. Morgan Stanley emphasizes that the infrastructure model offers more predictable income and deserves higher valuation multiples.

Morgan Stanley has started formally analyzing the three major publicly traded Bitcoin miners. They argued that these miners should not be viewed as a cryptocurrency bet; instead, they should be valued as an infrastructure business. The bank has given overweight ratings on Cipher Mining and Terawulf, while giving Marathon Digital an underweight rating.

Morgan Stanley believes that once the mining company starts building large, powered sites and signing long-term contracts with customers, it starts looking like a real utility and infrastructure company. Infrastructure investors usually pay higher valuations because income is predictable and contracted with less dependence on the bitcoin value.

Why Cipher and TeraWulf Seem to be Positive

Morgan Stanley says Cipher is well-positioned for what he called a “REIT endgame.” If the Cipher leases its building and power capacity to the AI instead of mining, then risk drops, and valuation could increase. Morgan Stanley sees more upside if the transaction happens.

TeraWulf also received a similar positive rating because the management has deep power and infrastructure experience, with the company already having a history of signing hosting and data center agreements. The analyst believes that future sites can be converted from mining to AI tenants.

Why is Morgan Stanley Cautious on Marathon Digital

For Marathon Digital, Stanley took a different position. Morgan Stanley says that the MARA behaves mainly like the bitcoin price vehicle, and it actively tries to increase BTC exposure. So its stock performance depends heavily on the difficulty, power costs, and BTC price swings. Morgan Stanley warns that mining profitability faces pressure from competition and rising energy demands.

These reports arrive when the investors are debating the future identity of Bitcoin miners. Morgan Stanley replies with its report to all the investors that the infrastructure model gives more stability and deserves a higher value than pure mining.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Dogecoin Price Shows Mixed Signals as Key Technical Levels Are Tested

TagsCipher MiningJPMorganMarathon

相關問答

QWhat is Morgan Stanley's main argument regarding the valuation of major Bitcoin miners?

AMorgan Stanley argues that Bitcoin miners should not be viewed as a cryptocurrency bet but should be valued as infrastructure businesses, as they build large powered sites and sign long-term contracts, making them similar to utility companies.

QWhich two Bitcoin mining companies received an 'overweight' rating from Morgan Stanley?

ACipher Mining and TeraWulf received overweight ratings from Morgan Stanley.

QWhy does Morgan Stanley view Cipher Mining positively, specifically mentioning a 'REIT endgame'?

AMorgan Stanley views Cipher positively because it is well-positioned for a 'REIT endgame,' where leasing its building and power capacity to AI instead of mining would reduce risk and increase valuation.

QWhat is the reason for Morgan Stanley's cautious (underweight) rating on Marathon Digital?

AMorgan Stanley is cautious on Marathon Digital because it behaves mainly as a Bitcoin price vehicle, actively increasing BTC exposure, making its stock performance heavily dependent on mining difficulty, power costs, and BTC price swings, with profitability facing competition and rising energy demands.

QAccording to the report, what advantage does the infrastructure model offer to investors?

AThe infrastructure model offers more stability and deserves a higher valuation because income is predictable and contracted, with less dependence on the value of Bitcoin.

你可能也喜歡

美国对伊朗支持比特币支付的加密服务Hormuz Safe实施制裁

美国财政部通过外国资产控制办公室(OFAC)对两家伊朗公司——波斯湾海上保险公司(PGMIC)和霍尔木兹安全海上服务局——实施制裁,指控其建立了一套通过加密货币支付数字海上保险来规避制裁的计划。同时,八艘船舶和八家被华盛顿指为伊朗“影子船队”组成部分的公司也受到限制。 OFAC称,伊朗政府建立了一个系统,强制要求商业船舶购买强制海上保险才能通过霍尔木兹海峡。伊朗于2026年5月正式启动霍尔木兹安全平台,允许使用比特币等加密货币支付保险单,预计该平台每年可带来高达100亿美元收入。美国当局认为,这种模式使伊朗政权能够获得额外收入并规避西方制裁。 美国财长斯科特·贝森特指责伊朗利用国际航运资助恐怖主义、侵略和伊斯兰革命卫队的镇压行动。OFAC强调,这些保险本应保护船舶免遭扣押等风险,但美方认为大部分风险是伊朗自身制造的。 此外,OFAC还对八家航运公司和油轮实施了制裁,指控其在违反国际限制的情况下运输伊朗石油及石油产品。自2026年初以来,OFAC已对超过100艘与伊朗“影子船队”相关的船舶实施了制裁。受制裁公司的资产将被冻结,且美国公司被禁止与其进行交易。此次制裁是在美伊外交接触的背景下实施的,有报道称伊朗尚未回应美国通过卡塔尔提出的重返谈判建议。

cryptonews.ru13 分鐘前

美国对伊朗支持比特币支付的加密服务Hormuz Safe实施制裁

cryptonews.ru13 分鐘前

“新一轮周期前的最后阶段”。比特币在八月将何去何从

《RBK-加密》指出,比特币在7月底从多年低点反弹超10%,但受访专家预计8月不会持续上涨,反而可能跌破6万美元。专家认为,历史趋势和宏观经济因素正在压制加密货币市场,8月将是“区间测试”月份,而非趋势逆转之时。 截至7月底,比特币交易价格约为6.35万美元,较2025年10月的历史高点12.62万美元下跌约50%。自6月初以来,其价格主要在6万至6.5万美元的狭窄区间内波动。 专家指出,比特币面临不利的宏观经济环境,包括美国高利率、持续通胀和高油价,这些因素共同构成压力。高利率使得国债等固定收益资产比加密货币更具吸引力,同时投资者也流向半导体和人工智能相关股票,加剧了资本竞争。比特币现货ETF在2024年上半年出现净流出54亿美元,仅6月就流出创纪录的45亿美元,7月的资金流入微乎其微。 历史数据也显示,8月对加密货币市场通常是弱势月份,2013-2025年间8月的平均收益率为1.12%,但中位数为负7.49%,表明下跌月份居多。美国关键的加密监管法案《CLARITY Act》迟迟未获通过,也增加了不确定性。 尽管如此,专家认为当前可能正处于新周期开始前的最后阶段。每次熊市约持续400天,当前环境适合长期积累比特币。多数专家预计8月比特币将在5.8万至6.8万美元区间震荡,关键支撑位在6-6.1万美元,若跌破5.8万可能下探5-5.5万美元。上涨至6.7万并突破6.8万阻力位的概率较低。部分观点认为,市场可能需等到今年第四季度才会出现更明确的趋势性运动。 专家建议投资者可考虑在比特币和强势项目上逐步建立头寸,但应避免 meme 币和新兴代币。长期来看,市场已处于不错的入场位置。

cryptonews.ru13 分鐘前

“新一轮周期前的最后阶段”。比特币在八月将何去何从

cryptonews.ru13 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片