Cross-Border Payment Giant Wise Lands on NASDAQ

marsbit發佈於 2026-05-16更新於 2026-05-16

文章摘要

Fintech company Wise has successfully listed its A-class shares on the Nasdaq stock exchange under the ticker "WSE," while maintaining its secondary listing on the London Stock Exchange. This move, more of a primary listing transfer to the US than a traditional IPO, reflects Wise's strategic shift to be closer to a key growth market, attract a broader investor base, and support its business evolution. Founded in London by two Estonians to solve personal pain points with costly and opaque international bank transfers, Wise initially grew as TransferWise by offering faster, cheaper, and more transparent currency exchange and cross-border payments. It has since expanded beyond a simple transfer tool into a comprehensive global financial services platform, offering multi-currency accounts, business services, debit cards, and the Wise Platform, which provides its infrastructure to banks and other institutions. Wise's latest fiscal year data highlights its scale: $243 billion in cross-border transaction volume, $39 billion in customer balances, and nearly 19 million customers. The company continues to emphasize its low average fee of 0.52% and fast transaction speeds, with 75% of payments arriving within 20 seconds. The Nasdaq listing aligns with Wise's ambitions in the US market, where it aims to grow its consumer and business user base and, critically, deepen partnerships with American banks through Wise Platform. To further strengthen its US operations, Wise is reportedly see...

Author: Zhijia Ge, Zhifu Zhijia

Two Estonians in London, seeking to save on a bank currency exchange fee, devised a method for matching funds between friends. Over a decade later, the company debuted on NASDAQ under the name Wise, with a market cap fluctuating around $15.5 billion.

Zhifu Zhijia has learned that Wise Group plc Class A ordinary shares began trading on NASDAQ on May 11, 2026, under the ticker symbol "WSE". On the same day, Wise maintained its secondary listing on the London Stock Exchange, with the LSE code "WISE".

As of delayed trading on May 11, WSE was quoted at $15.40, up $0.90 from the previous reference price, an increase of approximately 6.21%.

Wise's official disclosed data for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, also shows that the company's annual cross-border transaction volume reached $243 billion, customer-held funds balance reached $39 billion, transaction revenue was $1.9 billion, and net revenue was $2.5 billion. For a company that started with low-cost cross-border remittances, this scale is sufficient to support its market positioning as a "leading global cross-border payment company".

This is not a traditional initial public offering. Wise did not issue new shares to raise capital nor completely exit the London market. Instead, through a reorganization arrangement, Wise Group plc was placed as the new ultimate parent company of the group, and the primary listing location was moved to the US via a dual listing approach.

Wise's relocation of its primary listing to the US corresponds to a change in its business identity. A company that grew from a cross-border remittance tool is now using the US primary listing to reorganize its investor base, business narrative, and governance structure.

Wise, Born from Exchange Rate Gaps

The starting point of Wise's story is not complicated. Two young Estonians living in London, one needed pounds, the other needed euros. Taavet Hinrikus was an early employee at Skype, living in London but receiving income in euros; Kristo Käärmann was working at Deloitte at the time, also in London with income in pounds, but had a euro mortgage to repay in Estonia.

They both had to exchange currencies through banks, and both encountered the same problem.

Bank transfers were expensive, exchange rates were opaque, and fees were often hidden in seemingly inconspicuous exchange rate spreads. Cross-border fund movement was originally a very specific daily life issue, but the complex bank processes and non-transparent pricing methods created distance.

Their initial solution was simple. Taavet kept his euros in Europe, Kristo kept his pounds in the UK, and they matched funds at a rate close to the real exchange rate, each arranging funds locally. This way, the money didn't need to travel between the two countries every time, and the expensive bank exchange costs were bypassed.

This method later evolved into TransferWise.

What first attracted users wasn't complex financial concepts, but changes ordinary users could understand at a glance: using the real exchange rate, fees laid out transparently, and clear arrival times. Cross-border transfers were no longer a black box at bank counters, nor a process users could only passively wait for after payment.

This determined Wise's subsequent product character. It has always positioned itself with transparent pricing, low fees, and speed as its main labels. Users see not only whether they can send money but also know in advance how much they pay in fees, how much the recipient will ultimately receive, and approximately when the funds will arrive.

In the traditional bank cross-border remittance system, fees are often scattered across service charges, exchange rate spreads, intermediary bank fees, and delivery delays. Wise targeted these hidden costs from the start. It didn't enter the market with "more complex financial products" but with clearer pricing and more predictable delivery experiences, reducing user uncertainty about cross-border remittances.

This starting point influenced Wise's later expansion direction. Wise later expanded into accounts, business payments, cards, Wise Platform, and connections to local payment systems, but its early product logic never disappeared: cross-border fund flows should be faster, cheaper, and more transparent.

From a currency exchange arrangement between two friends to a listed company with a market cap fluctuating around $15.5 billion, Wise's growth was not solely driven by capital. It initially solved a real user pain point, and behind that pain point lay the long-standing issues of cost, efficiency, and transparency in global cross-border payments.

From this starting point, Wise's later expansion was not a deviation from cross-border remittances but rather the continuation of applying the product logic of "cheaper, more transparent, faster" to accounts, business payments, and institutional services.

The Ambition Without 'Transfer'

Wise was once called TransferWise. The name was direct, its core being cross-border transfers.

Early users understood it simply: use it to send money, cheaper than traditional banks; use it for currency exchange, prices are clearer; use it for transfers, delivery speed is more predictable. This positioning quickly gained TransferWise a batch of users involved in cross-border living, studying, working, freelancing, and small businesses.

But if a cross-border payment company remains only at "cheap transfers," it easily hits growth boundaries.

User remittance frequency is limited, per-transaction fees continue to decline, and market competition constantly squeezes profit margins. Wise's real subsequent change was expanding single cross-border remittances into a cross-border capital service system around individuals, businesses, and institutions.

Renaming to Wise was the external manifestation of this change.

From TransferWise to Wise, losing "Transfer," the company hopes the market sees it no longer as a single transfer tool. Today's Wise serves both personal cross-border transfers and business payments, multi-currency accounts, debit cards, customer-held funds balance management, and also provides cross-border payment capabilities to banks, financial institutions, and businesses through the Wise Platform.

Individual users use Wise to complete international transfers, currency exchange, overseas spending, and multi-currency fund management. Business users use Wise to receive payments from overseas customers, pay suppliers, manage multi-currency accounts, and handle payments in international operations. Institutional clients can embed Wise's cross-border payment capabilities into their own products and systems via the Wise Platform.

Wise's business has expanded from "helping users send one transfer" to "helping users and institutions manage cross-border fund flows." Single transactions are still important, but accounts, balances, cards, local payment system access, and institutional partnerships are becoming more critical.

Wise's officially disclosed data supports this change.

The latest financial report shows Wise's cross-border transaction volume reached $243 billion, a year-on-year increase of 31%; customer-held funds balance reached $39 billion, up 40%; transaction revenue reached $1.9 billion, and net revenue reached $2.5 billion. The company also served nearly 19 million personal and business customers in the 2026 fiscal year.

This data indicates that Wise can no longer be appropriately understood merely as a low-fee remittance tool. A low-fee remittance tool needs user growth and brand recognition; a cross-border capital platform requires a global payment network, an account system, local payment system access, compliance capabilities, institutional partnerships, and long-term understanding from capital markets. Wise's NASDAQ primary listing is happening precisely at this stage of its business.

Wise mentioned in its latest listing announcement that its global payment network consists of over 80 licenses and 8 markets directly connected to local payment systems, supporting over 40 currencies. Among payments completed via Wise, 75% arrive within 20 seconds, and 96% within 24 hours. The company also stated its average fee rate is 0.52%, lower than the global industry's common 3% to 5% charging level.

The value of a cross-border payment platform is not only the transaction entry point but also includes license coverage, local payment system access, delivery efficiency, cost control, pricing transparency, and large-scale processing capacity. The story Wise wants to tell has expanded from "cheap remittances" to "global capital service network."

A New Coordinate on NASDAQ

This is not Wise's first entry into public capital markets.

In 2021, Wise listed on the London Stock Exchange via a direct listing. At that time, it was one of the representative cases of UK fintech companies listing in London. The London market needed tech companies, UK fintech needed iconic listed companies, and Wise happened to be at that intersection.

In less than five years, Wise moved its primary listing to NASDAQ, retaining a secondary listing arrangement on the LSE.

Wise's shift to a US primary listing indeed means one fewer fintech representative case for the London market, but this migration doesn't only correspond to a geographical change in capital markets. For Wise itself, US market expansion, investor coverage, stock liquidity, and the cooperation potential of Wise Platform with banks and platform institutions are the more direct business contexts.

Reasons Wise previously provided in documents include: expanding the investor base, especially enabling more US-based institutional and retail investors to participate; enhancing stock liquidity; creating conditions for future inclusion in major US indices; and improving Wise's brand recognition among US customers.

In Wise's latest listing announcement, Chairman David Wells also mentioned that the US listing brings the company closer to the world's deepest, most liquid capital market and better matches the important growth opportunity that the US represents.

The US market holds two layers of meaning for Wise.

The first layer is users and business. The US itself is one of the most active markets for global cross-border fund flows. Studying abroad, immigration, freelancing, cross-border employment, overseas e-commerce, and global supply chains continuously generate small-amount, high-frequency, and enterprise-level cross-border payment needs. Wise's past rapid growth relied precisely on deconstructing the complex, opaque, slow, and expensive issues in traditional international remittances, using lower prices and faster speeds to capture some of the cross-border payment experience advantages from banks.

The second layer is institutional cooperation. Wise previously specifically mentioned in documents that the US has over 4,000 banks, including several global large banks. For Wise Platform, this is not an ordinary market statistic but a set of potential cooperation entry points. The core of Wise Platform is embedding the cross-border payment, multi-currency account, card issuance, and local payment network capabilities Wise has built into the systems of banks, financial institutions, platform companies, and large enterprises via APIs and institutional partnerships.

Wise's official listing announcement also emphasized that the company already serves millions of US consumers and businesses through Wise Account, Wise Business, and Wise Platform, and will continue to expand its local presence in the US to reach more US banks, online platforms, and cross-border transaction users. This statement directly links the NASDAQ primary listing with US business expansion.

The NASDAQ primary listing will also change how Wise faces investors.

Wise has previously mentioned that its 2026 fiscal year performance will be presented in US dollars and under US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), rather than continuing primarily in pounds and under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Currency, accounting standards, trading markets, and comparable companies will all influence how investors understand a company's growth and profits.

After entering the US primary market, Wise needs US investors to understand it in familiar ways. It is no longer just a fintech company in the London market, nor just a success story among European startups. It must place itself within the narrative systems of platform-type tech companies, payment network companies, and global fintech companies more familiar to the US market.

Wise did not completely exit London; the LSE still maintains trading arrangements. However, the most important trading and pricing venue shifts to the US. London remains part of the company's history, regulation, and shareholder structure, while NASDAQ becomes its capital market home field for the next growth stage.

From a capital market perspective, Wise's move to NASDAQ seeks deeper liquidity, broader investor coverage, and higher visibility. From a payment business perspective, it is also placing the US market in a higher position, paving the way for Wise Platform, US bank partnerships, and USD payment capability building.

The US primary listing addresses capital market understanding, while Wise Platform and US payment capabilities address business network issues.

From Bank Rival to Bank Partner

Wise Platform is a more critical piece in Wise's subsequent growth.

If early TransferWise mainly replaced bank cross-border remittance services, then Wise Platform reconfigures Wise's relationship with banks, platforms, and enterprises. In the past, users bypassed banks to use Wise for cheaper cross-border transfers; now, banks may also embed Wise's capabilities into their own products, using Wise to improve their clients' cross-border payment experience.

This is a role change. Wise is both a challenger to traditional banks' cross-border remittance business and a potential supplier of cross-border payment capabilities to banks.

Wise disclosed in its Form 20-F filing that Wise Platform can open capabilities such as instant cross-border transfers, multi-currency accounts, card issuance, and access to global local payment systems, wallets, and card networks to partner institutions.

The filing also mentioned that Wise Platform has been adopted by banks like Itaú, Mandiri, Nubank, Monzo, etc., but currently, this business contributes less than 10% of transaction revenue. The company's long-term goal is for Wise Platform to contribute over 50% of cross-border transaction volume.

If this goal is achieved, Wise's valuation logic will further change. Personal remittance business brings user scale and transaction volume, business account operations bring more stable cash flow and business relationships, while Wise Platform could turn Wise into a cross-border payment capability provider behind banks and platforms.

When a cross-border payment company reaches a certain scale, low fees are no longer just a front-end pricing strategy but also depend on back-end network capabilities. Whoever can more directly access local payment systems has a better chance to reduce intermediary layers, lower processing costs, improve delivery certainty, and output these capabilities to banks and platforms.

Building payment capabilities in the US market is precisely a key next-phase action for Wise.

A Reuters report mentioned that Wise has applied to establish a national trust bank in the US and plans to seek a master account with the Federal Reserve. If approved, Wise would have the opportunity to reduce reliance on intermediary banks, improve USD payment processing efficiency, and gain stronger control over its largest currency fund flows.

This step is important for Wise.

The US dollar is one of the core currencies in global cross-border payments. For a cross-border payment platform, USD fund processing efficiency, clearing costs, and account control capabilities directly impact user prices, delivery speed, and profit margins. Whether it can reduce dependence on intermediary banks and process USD fund flows more directly will affect Wise's competitiveness in the US market.

The NASDAQ primary listing and US payment capability building correspond to two arrangements for Wise in capital markets and business networks, respectively. Changing the listing location itself won't improve payment efficiency, but it can increase Wise's visibility, investor coverage, and business trust in the US market. Meanwhile, actions related to a national trust bank and master account are closer to back-end fund processing capabilities.

Combined, Wise is telling a complete story in the US market: front-end has individual and business clients, institutional side has Wise Platform, capital side has NASDAQ primary listing, and back-end is advancing more direct USD payment processing capabilities.

As cross-border payment competition becomes platform-based, early price advantages need to be supported by licenses, networks, accounts, local payment system connections, compliance capabilities, and institutional partnerships. Wise's growth has reached this stage.

For cross-border payment companies, truly long-term effective cost advantages ultimately return to local payment system access, fund processing efficiency, and compliance coverage capabilities.

China Corridor and the Market Cap Test

Wise is not entirely unrelated to mainland China.

Wise's official help center shows it supports individuals and businesses sending Renminbi to China, with receipt methods involving Alipay, WeChat Pay, UnionPay-related accounts, and bank transfers.

For sending Renminbi out of China, Wise states that this service is provided in cooperation with a licensed third-party payment institution regulated by the People's Bank of China and is only applicable to personal accounts meeting identity, work, and tax record requirements, with funds only transferable to the user's own overseas account or Wise account.

Wise's role in China-related cross-border fund scenarios mainly manifests as service reach and cooperation channel arrangements; mainland China licensed payment institutions assume the role of local channels. The "Lakala - Reserve Fund Account" appearing in Wise's payment instructions also corresponds to the practical arrangements for local payments, bank transfers, and reserve fund management in cross-border capital services.

Wise already has service reach in China-related cross-border fund scenarios, but Renminbi outflow services from China are completed via cooperation channels with domestic licensed payment institutions.

Cross-border payment is not a purely technical issue.

It involves local regulatory permits, payment institution reserve fund accounts, bank app transfers, user identity and tax materials, fund usage purposes, consistency of payer and payee account names, among other links. Wise's ability to integrate these complex requirements into the user process is part of its product capability; but in each market, it must design service boundaries according to local rules.

Listing on NASDAQ will not automatically change Wise's business boundaries in mainland China. It can bring higher US market visibility, better stock liquidity, and more investor coverage, but cross-border payment business itself remains constrained by local payment, foreign exchange, anti-money laundering, and client fund protection rules in each market. Capital market migration can change the company narrative but cannot bypass local regulatory requirements.

Beyond business boundaries, corporate governance is also an unavoidable part of Wise's primary listing location migration.

In 2025, when Wise shareholders voted on related arrangements, the proposal also included an extension of the dual-class share structure. Wise's Class A and Class B shares do not have equal voting rights, with Class B shares possessing higher voting power. Co-founder Taavet Hinrikus publicly opposed related proposals, with core dissatisfaction being that the primary listing location migration and voting rights arrangements were placed in the same package for voting.

This controversy reflects the balance between long-term founder control, ordinary shareholder rights, capital market preferences, and the company's long-term strategy as a fintech company enters the mature listed stage.

Dual-class share structures are not uncommon among US tech companies, and the market often accepts founders retaining stronger voting rights in exchange for strategic continuity and long-term investment. But such arrangements naturally trigger governance disputes, especially when bound together with listing location migration, whether ordinary shareholders have sufficient choice becomes a focal point of controversy.

Wise ultimately gained shareholder support, and the path to US primary listing continued. But the governance dispute left a practical question: when a payment tech company needs both long-term infrastructure investment and faces public market investors, how does it find balance between founder control, shareholder protection, and business long-termism.

Cross-border payments involve regulation, compliance, system investment, and long-term network building, indeed requiring operators to have a longer cycle. But listed companies must also respond to investor demands for transparency, equal rights, and governance constraints.

After listing on NASDAQ, new competition for Wise won't only occur in stock price performance. US investors will next watch whether its user growth can continue, whether cross-border transaction volume can continue to expand, whether customer-held funds balances and card business can bring more stable income, whether Wise Platform can grow from a low-proportion business into a long-term growth source for the company, and whether it can truly open bank partnership space in the US market.

The growth path of global cross-border payment companies is transitioning from single-point product competition to comprehensive capability competition. Early users care about whether transfers are cheap and fast; business customers care about payment coverage, account management, reconciliation efficiency, and compliance materials; banks and platforms care about interface capabilities, stability, costs, customer experience, and regulatory responsibility division; capital markets care about scale, revenue structure, profit margins, governance, and long-term growth space.

Wise's NASDAQ primary listing brings all these issues into public market pricing simultaneously. It is no longer content to be a representative of UK fintech, nor tells only a story of "cheaper international transfers." It must make the US capital market believe that Wise has the opportunity to become part of the global capital flow network and continuously amplify scale at the individual, business, and institutional cooperation levels.

Of course, NASDAQ won't automatically give Wise a higher valuation. The US market has stronger liquidity, broader investor coverage, and more direct requirements for growth, profitability, and governance.

Wise needs to prove that its low-fee strategy can coexist with profitability; its customer growth can be sustained; its Wise Platform can turn from a long-term goal into real transaction volume; its regulatory compliance capabilities in multiple markets like the US, Europe, and Asia can support larger-scale fund flows; and its governance structure won't become a source of long-term valuation discount.

Wise moving from London to NASDAQ appears to be a change in listing location, but behind it is a change in the development stage of a cross-border payment company. It once challenged traditional banks with low fees and transparent exchange rates; now it must rely on accounts, platforms, networks, compliance, and capital market understanding to support the next growth phase.

By choosing NASDAQ, what Wise truly faces is whether the US market, institutional partnerships, and local payment capabilities behind its approximately $15.5 billion market cap can support the next phase of growth.

相關問答

QWhen did Wise Group plc's Class A shares begin trading on the Nasdaq, and under what ticker symbol?

AWise Group plc's Class A shares began trading on the Nasdaq on May 11, 2026, under the ticker symbol 'WSE'.

QWhat was the primary reason for the founders of Wise to create their initial solution?

AThe founders created their initial solution to avoid the high and non-transparent foreign exchange fees charged by traditional banks when they needed to transfer funds between Estonia and the UK for personal expenses.

QWhat is the long-term strategic goal for the volume contribution of Wise Platform to the company's total cross-border transactions?

AThe long-term strategic goal is for Wise Platform to contribute over 50% of the company's total cross-border transaction volume.

QHow does the company's move of its primary listing to Nasdaq relate to its business expansion, particularly in the United States?

AThe move aligns with the company's expansion strategy in the US market, aiming to improve brand awareness, facilitate potential banking partnerships (especially for Wise Platform), access a deeper investor base and capital markets, and support efforts to establish more direct US dollar payment processing capabilities.

QWhat was one of the key corporate governance issues highlighted during the process of moving Wise's primary listing to Nasdaq?

AA key governance issue was the bundling of the primary listing relocation with a proposal to extend a dual-class share structure (giving certain shares higher voting rights) into a single shareholder vote, which sparked debate about founder control versus shareholder rights.

你可能也喜歡

SharpLink CEO:如何理解以太坊开发者刚刚突破 100 万?

SharpLink CEO分享了其对以太坊开发者总数突破100万的见解。根据Electric Capital数据,以太坊历史开发者总数已达1,012,824人,其中约23.2万人在过去一年保持活跃,构成了加密领域最庞大的技术人才库。 作者认为,加密领域的核心竞争并非单纯追求速度与低费用,而是顶尖建设者的选择。以太坊凭借十年积累的制度、文化、经济与生态结构,形成了难以复制的综合优势,已成为可编程金融和互联网原生资本的默认操作系统。 这百万开发者正致力于攻克行业最前沿的挑战:通过预计2026年的Glamsterdam升级提升核心协议可扩展性;通过同步可组合性技术让众多Rollup如一条链般协同工作;以及积极布局抗量子能力,以太坊基金会已成立专门团队推进,目标是2029年前完成迁移。 更深层的护城河在于网络效应:以太坊的可组合性让应用像乐高积木一样互操作,EVM和Solidity技能在数百个网络中通用,形成了“更多开发者→更多工具与流动性→更多应用”的飞轮。此外,由超90万验证者保障的可信中立性、模块化扩展架构以及顶尖的研究与文化氛围,共同巩固了其作为大型机构首选信任层的地位。 作者在访问亚洲以太坊社区后强调,以太坊的竞争优势在于汇聚了改变未来金融的建设者,其生态不仅是链上活跃,更在成为互联网原生金融的长期协调层。

链捕手2 分鐘前

SharpLink CEO:如何理解以太坊开发者刚刚突破 100 万?

链捕手2 分鐘前

从身份协议到AI入口,World的野心有多大?

近期,加密市场中的WLD成为焦点,其价格持续上涨,市值突破30亿美元。这一热度源于World项目正式进入“The Simple Plan”第三阶段,其发展逻辑正从早期的代币激励转向实用驱动。World的核心目标是构建全球“人格证明”网络,通过扫描虹膜的World ID解决互联网中验证真实人类身份的关键问题。随着生成式AI爆发,区分真人与AI变得日益紧迫。 World的落地场景正在拓宽,覆盖企业端、个人端及AI Agent端。企业方面,与Zoom等公司合作应对深度伪造;个人层面,瞄准社交与票务等场景的真人验证需求;AI Agent端则推出AgentKit,旨在建立人与AI间的可信授权框架,为未来AI经济奠定信任基础。 市场上涨背后是对“真人身份”稀缺价值的重估。在AI内容成本趋近零的未来,真人身份与行为可能成为稀缺资源。World的运营策略也更聚焦,资源集中于高价值城市以构建网络效应,同时下一代Orb设备将实现自助化以降低扩张成本。 宏观来看,World可能推动加密叙事从金融扩展到身份基础设施,身份或成为可组合资产。它也有望成为AI Agent经济的关键入口,解决Agent归属、可信与验证问题。World ID 4.0引入的费用机制开启了协议的收入来源,使其商业模式更趋清晰。 总之,WLD的上涨反映了市场对World在AI时代定位的认可——其野心是成为验证人类身份的关键入口。随着AI与人的界限模糊,掌握人格证明网络可能意味着掌握下一代互联网的重要枢纽。

marsbit1 小時前

从身份协议到AI入口,World的野心有多大?

marsbit1 小時前

没有腾讯,燧原还剩什么?

燧原科技科创板IPO获通过,成为国产GPU“四小龙”中最后一家上市的公司。其招股书揭示了一个核心问题:公司营收高度依赖单一客户腾讯,2025年销售额的74.9%(按另一口径超80%)来自腾讯。 与其他“四小龙”先融资、讲故事的路径不同,燧原从成立起就锚定大客户交付,营收增长迅猛,2026年第一季度同比暴增1474.85%。这种陡峭增长源于超级大客户的算力订单集中释放。 腾讯大规模采购燧原芯片,背后是自身庞大的AI算力需求(如混元大模型、元宝等)以及构建可控、稳定算力供应链的战略考量。燧原超过80%的加速卡及模组收入来自推理产品,精准匹配了腾讯大模型落地的急需。 腾讯不仅是燧原第一大客户,也是持股20.26%的第一大股东。这种“股东+客户”的深度绑定,在产业逻辑上被视为供应链培育。腾讯通过确定性订单帮助燧原迭代工艺,而自身业务系统与燧原芯片的深度集成也形成了较高的替换成本,构成了燧原的生态护城河。 行业格局逐渐清晰:英伟达为规则制定者,华为昇腾走国家级路线,而燧原、摩尔线程等商业化玩家则依靠市场订单。燧原的定位愈发偏向“腾讯生态的算力底座”,其产品路线图与腾讯需求高度协同。 文章指出,中国AI芯片行业已告别PPT融资驱动,进入残酷的订单交付周期。未来比拼的关键不再是技术参数,而是订单量、交付能力和生态绑定深度。燧原手握腾讯长期且金额翻倍的采购订单,这或许比技术本身更能体现其现阶段价值。国产芯片的长期主义,在于赢得客户的信任、场景和持续订单。

marsbit1 小時前

没有腾讯,燧原还剩什么?

marsbit1 小時前

BTC 市场脉搏:第25周

比特币市场显现试探性反弹,但结构证据指向企稳而非趋势逆转。上周关键变化是交易者行为显著转变:永续合约CVD从-7.7亿美元转为+1.82亿美元,现货CVD从-2.05亿美元回升至接近盈亏平衡。RSI自超卖区反弹94.8%,但仍处29.1低位,显示缺乏持续买盘主导。 反弹基础脆弱:现货成交量骤降40.4%至58亿美元,期货未平仓合约再降3%至306亿美元,表明上涨主要由空头回补驱动。多头资金费率下降22.3%,ETF交易量下降38.1%至111亿美元,市场流动性减弱而非健康改善。 市场恐慌情绪有所缓解:波动率利差一周内压缩85%至4.07%,期权参与者快速下调尾部风险定价。25-Delta偏度从19.07%降至15.99%,反映下行保护需求减少。ETF净流出改善65.5%至-4.65亿美元,ETF MVRV回升至1.06。投降速度放缓:已实现盈亏比改善46%,NUPL收窄14%,但两者仍处亏损区间。 链上数据显示市场活动趋冷:活跃地址减少6.3%,实体调整转账量下降38.8%至39亿美元。已实现市值变化加深至-1.3%,表明资金持续流出网络。积极信号在于供应结构:热资本占比和短期持有者/长期持有者比率均跌破下轨,显示近期买入的供应已被大量清洗,持有者结构正转向长期主导。 目前仅50.8%流通供应处于盈利状态,低于55.1%的下轨,虽压制抛压但也延长投资者压力期。总体而言,市场正在构建盘整基础而非确认反转,缺乏成交量、衍生品规模收缩及资金持续外流表明,市场仍需等待真正的信心与机构资金回归作为催化动力。

insights.glassnode1 小時前

BTC 市场脉搏:第25周

insights.glassnode1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片