Behind the $1 Billion Revenue: How Long Can Pump.fun's Money Printer Keep Running?

比推發佈於 2026-03-17更新於 2026-03-17

文章摘要

Pump.fun, a leading meme coin launch platform on Solana, has surpassed $1 billion in cumulative revenue, becoming the first on the chain to reach this milestone. Despite a broader market downturn in 2026, its dominance has solidified, capturing over 90% of daily trading volume and token creation on Solana. While its daily metrics remain strong, a significant portion of its revenue is shared with creators and LPs or used for token buybacks, which hasn't prevented its native token's price from falling over 76% from its peak. The analysis extends to other major players, revealing a market consolidation where traffic and profits are increasingly concentrated among top platforms. GMGN saw a five-fold quarterly revenue increase, primarily driven by activity on BSC, while Four.meme, BSC's main launchpad, operates at a fraction of its peak income. In contrast, platforms like Axiom, Photon, BullX, and BONKbot show steeper, sustained declines in revenue. The conclusion is that the meme coin sector is not disappearing but is undergoing a rapid shakeout. The survivors are platforms with robust, full-cycle ecosystems for token launches, trading, and liquidity. If another meme wave emerges, these established players are poised to capture the majority of the gains.

Author: Frank, PANews

Original Title: Pump.fun Joins the Billion-Dollar Club, How Much Business Does the "MEME Cash Machine" Have Left?


On March 8, Pump.fun's cumulative revenue exceeded $1 billion, making it the first platform on Solana to reach this milestone and solidifying its position as the most prominent money printer in the MEME sector. However, after the hype subsided, the question is no longer just "who made the most money," but rather how much business these MEME-driven platforms still have left.

Looking at top ecosystem projects like Pump.fun, GMGN, Four.meme, Axiom, as well as Photon, BullX, and BONK, the answer is becoming increasingly clear: MEME hasn't disappeared, but the business is increasingly concentrated among the top players, and the divergence between chains and platforms is becoming more pronounced.

Pump.fun: The "Absolute Oligarch" Across Bull and Bear Markets, Billions in Profits but Hard to Retain

If the last wave of MEME frenzy was a non-stop gold rush, then Pump.fun was undoubtedly the most profitable toll booth in this gold rush town. Public data shows that as of March 2026, Pump.fun's cumulative total revenue has exceeded $1 billion. Of this, 2024 contributed approximately $321 million, and 2025 further increased to about $664 million. Starting in 2026, the MEME industry experienced a significant downturn, but Pump.fun seemed relatively unaffected, still generating about $98.3 million in revenue to date.

In terms of market structure, Pump.fun's dominant position in the Solana ecosystem has further strengthened. Taking data from March 15 as an example, Pump.fun's token creation share reached 99.1%, the graduation rate of tokens was 94.8%, and its daily trading volume share was about 93%. That day, Pump.fun launched 24,938 tokens, while LetsBonk had only 132, Bags had 50, and Moonshot had 28. The daily volume of other token launch platforms is no longer competitive with Pump.fun.

Looking back at Pump.fun's own data, it has also maintained a surprisingly high standard. Rough calculations based on visible data from the past two weeks show that Pump.fun currently averages about 29,700 token launches per day, with approximately 157,700 daily active wallets, a daily trading volume of about $93.65 million, and daily revenue of about $870,000. At the same time, the graduation rate, long seen as a weakness of the platform, has shown signs of recovery, recently even surging to around 1.70%. Although the specific reason behind this short-term peak is not yet clear, Pump.fun's graduation efficiency is indeed improving.

However, although fee generation remains robust, for Pump.fun, it does not mean that all this revenue can be fully converted into protocol profits. First, more than half of the fees are given to creators and LPs. Second, the remaining revenue is also used for token buybacks. In the first quarter of 2026, Pump.fun generated a total of $227 million in fees, of which $123 million was distributed to creators and LPs, and the remaining $100 million was almost entirely used for token buybacks.

The problem is that the buybacks did not automatically translate into a rise in token price. As of March 16, the price of PUMP was about $0.002, still about 76.21% lower than its all-time high of $0.0088. A more reasonable explanation is that buybacks can only provide support and maintain the narrative but are insufficient to reverse the overall compression of valuations in the MEME sector. In other words, Pump.fun's cash flow machine is still running at high speed, but the market is no longer willing to give it higher valuation multiples simply because it "makes money," as it did during the last hype cycle.

In summary, for Pump.fun, the market structure remains relatively stable. Although the entire meme coin sector is experiencing a decline, it's mostly the competitors that have died off,反而 making Pump.fun's dominance even stronger. If this market can explode again, Pump.fun is likely to capture even greater红利.

GMGN: Quarterly Revenue Grows Fivefold, BSC Becomes the "New Traffic Hotspot"

GMGN's revenue saw another explosive growth in the first quarter of 2026. Total revenue for Q1 2026 reached $25.31 million, a nearly fivefold increase compared to $5.64 million in Q4 2025. This quarter's revenue also became the second-highest quarterly revenue in GMGN's history (only lower than Q1 2025's $40.81 million).

A closer look at this revenue structure shows that it is mainly driven by the BSC chain. Starting in October 2025, GMGN's trading volume on the BSC chain began to significantly exceed that on Solana, and by 2026 this trend had stabilized. To date, the trading share on the BSC chain on GMGN is nearly three times that of the Solana chain.

From an overall trading volume perspective, user activity and trading volume on GMGN improved somewhat in Q1 2026, but the increase is not as high as the revenue change suggests. Therefore, from this angle, the revenue improvement in Q1 2026 is real, but the explosive growth is likely a statistical issue with DefiLlama (BSC chain revenue data was empty before October 2025).

However, this growth was primarily driven by a surge in MEME trading volume on the BSC chain in January, which generated $16.34 million in cross-chain revenue that month. This number dropped to $5.18 million in February and is about $3.77 million so far in March. The overall level for Q1 this year is similar to that of the same period in 2025.

Four.meme: The "Face" of BSC, Daily Revenue Only a Fraction of Its Peak

If Pump.fun has almost absorbed most of the traffic on Solana launch platforms, then on BSC, the closest to a similar role is Four.meme.

DeFiLlama data shows that as of March 16, Four.meme's protocol revenue for Q1 2026 has reached $16 million, significantly lower than the $54.24 million in Q4 2025. However, looking at the monthly revenue changes this year, there has been a slight recovery.

According to visible data tracked by Dune for the last 10 days, Four.meme averages about 4,858 token launches per day, with approximately 5,749 daily users. Only about 25.7 tokens are listed on the DEX Pancake daily, and the short-term graduation rate has further dropped to around 0.53%. Judging from these data changes, the current Four.meme is also operating at a low level. Compared to the peak daily revenue of $4.22 million in October 2025, current revenue has fallen to the $200,000-$300,000 level.

For comparison, estimates based on Pump.fun's data from the past two weeks show it still averages about 29,700 token launches per day and a daily trading volume of about $93.65 million. Clearly, as the main platforms for MEME coins on Solana and BSC respectively, there is a significant gap in scale and token quality between Four.meme and Pump.fun, reflecting the development of MEME on these two chains.

Axiom: Farewell to High Growth, Stuck in a Continuous Volume Contraction Quagmire

If GMGN's growth in Q1 2026 was more like catching the红利 of the BSC rotation, then Axiom's situation is almost the opposite.

According to DeFiLlama data, as of now, the protocol's revenue in Q1 2026 is approximately $29.03 million, higher than GMGN's $25.31 million for the same period.

However, Axiom's current problem is that its business is in a state of continuous decline. According to DeFiLlama's quarterly revenue data, Axiom's protocol revenue reached highs of $133 million and $150 million in Q2 and Q3 2025 respectively, but fell to $60.66 million in Q4 2025, and is currently $29.03 million for Q1 2026. Compared to the most疯狂 phase last year, the business volume has significantly contracted. Comparing this with GMGN reveals that although both are in a post-peak decline phase, GMGN's revenue still has occasional阶段性 rebounds, while Axiom seems unable to regain its momentum.

For Axiom, it is no longer just a tool reliant on MEME hype bursts but更像是一台经历过多轮行情检验的成熟交易机器 (more like a mature trading machine that has been tested through multiple market cycles). Compared to GMGN, which is still talking about growth elasticity, Axiom's imagination space seems to be shrinking.

Photon, BullX, and BONK: The "Stragglers" After the Tide Recedes

Compared to GMGN, which still has rebounds, and Axiom, which maintains a leading scale, the revenue curves of Photon, BullX, and BONKbot have more clearly entered a downward trend in 2026.

According to DeFiLlama data as of March 16, Photon's cumulative revenue is approximately $438 million, but its quarterly revenue has declined from $122.8 million in Q1 2025, to $32.31 million in Q2, $18.99 million in Q3, $5.29 million in Q4, and is only $4.52 million so far in Q1 2026, showing a nearly阶梯式坠落 (stepped decline) trend.

BullX's cumulative revenue is about $203 million, but it also experienced rapid contraction. Quarterly revenue dropped from $87.37 million in Q1 2025 to $14.25 million in Q2, $3.86 million in Q3, $878,000 in Q4, and is only $491,000 so far in Q1 2026.

BONKbot's decline is relatively less steep but has also clearly receded. According to DeFiLlama data, its cumulative revenue is about $93.57 million. Quarterly revenue was $12.61 million in Q1 2025, then fell to $3.40 million in Q2, $2.85 million in Q3, $1.85 million in Q4, and is $1.84 million so far in Q1 2026.

However, the BONK ecosystem itself has not simultaneously熄火 (fizzled out). As of now, BONK.fun's protocol revenue for Q1 2026 is approximately $8.51 million, already higher than the $7.06 million in Q4 2025. Of this current quarter's revenue, about $6 million comes from Bonk.Fun, and about $1.84 million comes from BonkBot.

Looking at this MEME coin battle royale, it's not hard to draw a conclusion: the MEME track is not dying out; it's just that the era of wild competition has彻底终结 (completely ended), and the reshuffling speed has far exceeded everyone's expectations.

After the tide receded, the platforms that truly remained are no longer just the fastest runners but those that have built a complete closed loop encompassing launch, trading, liquidity, and fee collection. If the next wave of MEME行情 (market trend) starts again, they are most likely the ones to benefit first.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7620497

相關問答

QWhat is Pump.fun's total cumulative revenue as of March 8th, and why is this milestone significant?

APump.fun's cumulative revenue reached $1 billion as of March 8th, making it the first platform on Solana to achieve this milestone. It solidifies its position as the most prominent revenue generator in the MEME sector.

QHow has Pump.fun's revenue distribution changed, and what happens to the fees collected?

AA significant portion of Pump.fun's fees are distributed to creators and liquidity providers (LPs). For example, in Q1 2026, out of $227 million in fees, $123 million was given to creators and LPs, and the remaining $100 million was almost entirely used for token buybacks.

QWhich platform experienced a nearly 5x quarter-over-quarter revenue growth in Q1 2026, and on which blockchain was this growth primarily driven?

AGMGN experienced a nearly 5x quarter-over-quarter revenue growth in Q1 2026, reaching $25.31 million. This growth was primarily driven by a surge in activity on the BSC (Binance Smart Chain), which now accounts for nearly three times the trading volume of its Solana chain.

QHow does the current daily revenue of Four.meme compare to its peak, and what does this indicate about the BSC MEME market?

AFour.meme's current daily revenue has fallen to the $200,000-$300,000 range, which is only a fraction of its peak daily revenue of $4.22 million in October 2025. This indicates a significant cooling off and lower activity levels in the BSC MEME market compared to its previous highs.

QWhich MEME-related platforms are described as 'laggards' with clearly declining revenue curves in 2026?

AThe platforms described as 'laggards' with clearly declining revenue curves in 2026 are Photon, BullX, and BONKbot. Their quarterly revenues have shown a consistent and significant downward trend throughout 2025 and into 2026.

你可能也喜歡

BTC“数字黄金”的叙事是不是失败了?

这篇文章从三个核心问题探讨了比特币的现状与未来,强调提供的是思考框架而非投资建议。 **如何看待比特币资产?** 作者认为比特币是一种全新的、更优秀的“黄金”资产。其优势在于总量恒定、转移便捷、交易可审计。尽管早期与灰色地带关联,但合规化是趋势。目前全球数字货币渗透率仅3%-4%,类比互联网和电商的早期阶段,意味着比特币仍处于发展初期,潜力巨大但波动性也极高。 **如何理解本轮下跌?** 比特币自2025年10月高点(近12.6万美元)持续下跌,2026年2月一度跌破6.1万美元,单日跌幅达15%,随后又快速反弹。这被解读为遵循四年减半周期的共识性获利了结。特别之处在于,美国比特币ETF的批准引入了机构资金,也促使早期低成本持有者(如矿工和信仰者)进行大规模“换手”,这是资产迈向主流化的必经过程。历史数据显示,比特币历次大跌的幅度在收窄(从93%到当前的约50%),表明资产正在成熟,波动率逐步下降,但高波动仍是其获取超额回报的固有特征。 **长期如何看待发展?** 长期价值可对标黄金。当前比特币市值仅为黄金市值的约7%,若“数字黄金”叙事实现一半,上行空间依然显著。但作者提醒,短期市场脆弱,换手可能未完,底部无法预测。真正的风险并非资产归零(概率较低),而在于错误的仓位管理(如All-in或加杠杆)以及对资产缺乏深刻理解。投资者必须计算并承受潜在的最大回撤(例如从已跌50%的位置再跌50%),才能存活至长期价值兑现。 文章最后以亚马逊在互联网泡沫后暴涨为例,指出关键不在于比特币未来是否上涨,而在于投资者能否通过理性的仓位管理和深度认知,扛过剧烈波动存活到那一天。文末提问引导读者反思:当前黄金涨、比特币跌的局面,究竟意味着“数字黄金”叙事失败,还是资产进化过程中的换手阵痛?这取决于每个人对比特币最底层的信仰。

marsbit8 小時前

BTC“数字黄金”的叙事是不是失败了?

marsbit8 小時前

BTC“数字黄金”的叙事是不是失败了?

标题:BTC“数字黄金”的叙事是不是失败了? 作者:@wuk_Bitcoin 本文从三个核心问题出发,探讨比特币的现状与未来。 **如何看待比特币?** 作者认为比特币是一种全新的、更优秀的“黄金”类资产。其优势在于:总量恒定(2100万枚);资产可转移性极强,在全球不确定性时代具备溢价;所有交易链上可审计,透明度高。反驳了比特币主要用于灰色地带的过时观点,指出其正走向合规。目前全球数字货币渗透率仅约3%-4%,类比互联网和电商早期,意味着该资产类别仍处早期,潜力与巨大波动并存。 **如何理解本轮下跌?** 比特币自2025年10月高点(近12.6万美元)持续下跌,2026年2月初曾单日暴跌15%,跌破6.1万美元。这被视为遵循其四年减半周期的规律性回调,是长期持有者在周期高点锁定利润的结果。本轮下跌的特殊性在于:美国比特币ETF的批准引入了大量机构新资金,但也促使成本极低的早期持有者(矿工、OG)进行历史性抛售,即从“早期信仰者”向“长期配置机构”的换手过程。历史数据显示,比特币历次大回撤的跌幅在逐步收窄(从93%到目前的约50%),表明资产在成熟,波动率在下降,但高波动仍是获取超额回报的代价。 **长期怎么看?** 若将比特币视为“数字黄金”,其当前总市值(约1.4万亿美元)仅为黄金总市值(约20万亿美元)的7%。即使该叙事仅部分实现,上行空间依然可观。但作者强调短期风险:换手可能未结束,市场脆弱,不排除进一步下跌。真正的风险不在于资产归零(概率极低),而在于错误的仓位管理(如All-in、加杠杆)和对资产缺乏深度理解,这可能导致投资者无法承受巨大波动而提前被迫出局。 **最后对比** 作者以亚马逊在互联网泡沫破裂后股价跌95%又最终上涨42倍为例,指出关键在于“活着等到那一天”。对于比特币,核心同样是能否通过理性仓位管理活到其价值兑现之时。文末提问:当黄金大涨而比特币大跌,这究竟是“数字黄金”叙事的失败,还是资产进化过程中的阵痛?答案取决于每个人对比特币最底层的信仰。

链捕手8 小時前

BTC“数字黄金”的叙事是不是失败了?

链捕手8 小時前

从代码到认知:机器人大脑进化的万字指南

本文概述了机器人大脑从传统代码控制到现代人工智能模型驱动的演进历程。文章首先回顾了前大型语言模型(LLM)时代,机器人依赖手工编码的模块化技术栈(感知、状态估计、规划、控制)和行为树,虽稳定但泛化能力差。随后,深度学习改进了感知,强化学习和模仿学习进入了控制层,但策略仍较为狭窄。 ChatGPT的出现带来了转折。LLM最初被用作自然语言编译器,将指令转化为机器人可执行的原子技能序列(如谷歌的SayCan)。但更重要的突破是视觉-语言-动作模型(VLA),例如谷歌的RT-2和开源的OpenVLA,它能将视觉、语言信息融合,直接输出动作指令,实现了推理与行动的耦合。 目前最先进的系统采用“双脑”架构(如Figure AI的Helix、NVIDIA GR00T):一个慢速、参数多的“系统2”负责高层次推理和规划;一个快速、小巧的“系统1”负责高频动作生成。其下还可能有一个“系统0”反射层处理平衡等底层控制。出于延迟和可靠性考虑,安全关键的控制回路通常在机器人本地(如NVIDIA Jetson模块)运行,而对话界面和集群学习等任务可交由云端。 开源模型(如OpenVLA、GR00T、π0)降低了行业门槛,让初创公司能在其基础上用自有数据微调。然而,当前VLA机器人仍存在任务中途恢复能力弱、样本效率低、缺乏物理常识和长期规划能力等局限。 这催生了下一代方向:世界模型。这类模型(如NVIDIA Cosmos、Meta V-JEPA)能根据当前状态和动作预测未来结果,让机器人在行动前进行模拟和评估,从而改善恢复能力、泛化能力和长期规划。架构上主要分为像素级视频扩散、联合嵌入预测架构(JEPA)和潜在动作世界模型等流派。 文章最后指出,数据采集(特别是远程操作数据)是核心竞争力,仿真训练至关重要,机器人成本正在迅速下降。当前物理AI的发展阶段大约相当于“GPT-2时代”,虽未完全自主,但正通过架构的持续演进(从代码到感知、规划、策略,最终到世界模型),朝着更通用、更强大的方向稳步前进。

marsbit9 小時前

从代码到认知:机器人大脑进化的万字指南

marsbit9 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片