Behind the $1 Billion Revenue: How Long Can Pump.fun's Money Printer Keep Running?

比推發佈於 2026-03-17更新於 2026-03-17

文章摘要

Pump.fun, a leading meme coin launch platform on Solana, has surpassed $1 billion in cumulative revenue, becoming the first on the chain to reach this milestone. Despite a broader market downturn in 2026, its dominance has solidified, capturing over 90% of daily trading volume and token creation on Solana. While its daily metrics remain strong, a significant portion of its revenue is shared with creators and LPs or used for token buybacks, which hasn't prevented its native token's price from falling over 76% from its peak. The analysis extends to other major players, revealing a market consolidation where traffic and profits are increasingly concentrated among top platforms. GMGN saw a five-fold quarterly revenue increase, primarily driven by activity on BSC, while Four.meme, BSC's main launchpad, operates at a fraction of its peak income. In contrast, platforms like Axiom, Photon, BullX, and BONKbot show steeper, sustained declines in revenue. The conclusion is that the meme coin sector is not disappearing but is undergoing a rapid shakeout. The survivors are platforms with robust, full-cycle ecosystems for token launches, trading, and liquidity. If another meme wave emerges, these established players are poised to capture the majority of the gains.

Author: Frank, PANews

Original Title: Pump.fun Joins the Billion-Dollar Club, How Much Business Does the "MEME Cash Machine" Have Left?


On March 8, Pump.fun's cumulative revenue exceeded $1 billion, making it the first platform on Solana to reach this milestone and solidifying its position as the most prominent money printer in the MEME sector. However, after the hype subsided, the question is no longer just "who made the most money," but rather how much business these MEME-driven platforms still have left.

Looking at top ecosystem projects like Pump.fun, GMGN, Four.meme, Axiom, as well as Photon, BullX, and BONK, the answer is becoming increasingly clear: MEME hasn't disappeared, but the business is increasingly concentrated among the top players, and the divergence between chains and platforms is becoming more pronounced.

Pump.fun: The "Absolute Oligarch" Across Bull and Bear Markets, Billions in Profits but Hard to Retain

If the last wave of MEME frenzy was a non-stop gold rush, then Pump.fun was undoubtedly the most profitable toll booth in this gold rush town. Public data shows that as of March 2026, Pump.fun's cumulative total revenue has exceeded $1 billion. Of this, 2024 contributed approximately $321 million, and 2025 further increased to about $664 million. Starting in 2026, the MEME industry experienced a significant downturn, but Pump.fun seemed relatively unaffected, still generating about $98.3 million in revenue to date.

In terms of market structure, Pump.fun's dominant position in the Solana ecosystem has further strengthened. Taking data from March 15 as an example, Pump.fun's token creation share reached 99.1%, the graduation rate of tokens was 94.8%, and its daily trading volume share was about 93%. That day, Pump.fun launched 24,938 tokens, while LetsBonk had only 132, Bags had 50, and Moonshot had 28. The daily volume of other token launch platforms is no longer competitive with Pump.fun.

Looking back at Pump.fun's own data, it has also maintained a surprisingly high standard. Rough calculations based on visible data from the past two weeks show that Pump.fun currently averages about 29,700 token launches per day, with approximately 157,700 daily active wallets, a daily trading volume of about $93.65 million, and daily revenue of about $870,000. At the same time, the graduation rate, long seen as a weakness of the platform, has shown signs of recovery, recently even surging to around 1.70%. Although the specific reason behind this short-term peak is not yet clear, Pump.fun's graduation efficiency is indeed improving.

However, although fee generation remains robust, for Pump.fun, it does not mean that all this revenue can be fully converted into protocol profits. First, more than half of the fees are given to creators and LPs. Second, the remaining revenue is also used for token buybacks. In the first quarter of 2026, Pump.fun generated a total of $227 million in fees, of which $123 million was distributed to creators and LPs, and the remaining $100 million was almost entirely used for token buybacks.

The problem is that the buybacks did not automatically translate into a rise in token price. As of March 16, the price of PUMP was about $0.002, still about 76.21% lower than its all-time high of $0.0088. A more reasonable explanation is that buybacks can only provide support and maintain the narrative but are insufficient to reverse the overall compression of valuations in the MEME sector. In other words, Pump.fun's cash flow machine is still running at high speed, but the market is no longer willing to give it higher valuation multiples simply because it "makes money," as it did during the last hype cycle.

In summary, for Pump.fun, the market structure remains relatively stable. Although the entire meme coin sector is experiencing a decline, it's mostly the competitors that have died off,反而 making Pump.fun's dominance even stronger. If this market can explode again, Pump.fun is likely to capture even greater红利.

GMGN: Quarterly Revenue Grows Fivefold, BSC Becomes the "New Traffic Hotspot"

GMGN's revenue saw another explosive growth in the first quarter of 2026. Total revenue for Q1 2026 reached $25.31 million, a nearly fivefold increase compared to $5.64 million in Q4 2025. This quarter's revenue also became the second-highest quarterly revenue in GMGN's history (only lower than Q1 2025's $40.81 million).

A closer look at this revenue structure shows that it is mainly driven by the BSC chain. Starting in October 2025, GMGN's trading volume on the BSC chain began to significantly exceed that on Solana, and by 2026 this trend had stabilized. To date, the trading share on the BSC chain on GMGN is nearly three times that of the Solana chain.

From an overall trading volume perspective, user activity and trading volume on GMGN improved somewhat in Q1 2026, but the increase is not as high as the revenue change suggests. Therefore, from this angle, the revenue improvement in Q1 2026 is real, but the explosive growth is likely a statistical issue with DefiLlama (BSC chain revenue data was empty before October 2025).

However, this growth was primarily driven by a surge in MEME trading volume on the BSC chain in January, which generated $16.34 million in cross-chain revenue that month. This number dropped to $5.18 million in February and is about $3.77 million so far in March. The overall level for Q1 this year is similar to that of the same period in 2025.

Four.meme: The "Face" of BSC, Daily Revenue Only a Fraction of Its Peak

If Pump.fun has almost absorbed most of the traffic on Solana launch platforms, then on BSC, the closest to a similar role is Four.meme.

DeFiLlama data shows that as of March 16, Four.meme's protocol revenue for Q1 2026 has reached $16 million, significantly lower than the $54.24 million in Q4 2025. However, looking at the monthly revenue changes this year, there has been a slight recovery.

According to visible data tracked by Dune for the last 10 days, Four.meme averages about 4,858 token launches per day, with approximately 5,749 daily users. Only about 25.7 tokens are listed on the DEX Pancake daily, and the short-term graduation rate has further dropped to around 0.53%. Judging from these data changes, the current Four.meme is also operating at a low level. Compared to the peak daily revenue of $4.22 million in October 2025, current revenue has fallen to the $200,000-$300,000 level.

For comparison, estimates based on Pump.fun's data from the past two weeks show it still averages about 29,700 token launches per day and a daily trading volume of about $93.65 million. Clearly, as the main platforms for MEME coins on Solana and BSC respectively, there is a significant gap in scale and token quality between Four.meme and Pump.fun, reflecting the development of MEME on these two chains.

Axiom: Farewell to High Growth, Stuck in a Continuous Volume Contraction Quagmire

If GMGN's growth in Q1 2026 was more like catching the红利 of the BSC rotation, then Axiom's situation is almost the opposite.

According to DeFiLlama data, as of now, the protocol's revenue in Q1 2026 is approximately $29.03 million, higher than GMGN's $25.31 million for the same period.

However, Axiom's current problem is that its business is in a state of continuous decline. According to DeFiLlama's quarterly revenue data, Axiom's protocol revenue reached highs of $133 million and $150 million in Q2 and Q3 2025 respectively, but fell to $60.66 million in Q4 2025, and is currently $29.03 million for Q1 2026. Compared to the most疯狂 phase last year, the business volume has significantly contracted. Comparing this with GMGN reveals that although both are in a post-peak decline phase, GMGN's revenue still has occasional阶段性 rebounds, while Axiom seems unable to regain its momentum.

For Axiom, it is no longer just a tool reliant on MEME hype bursts but更像是一台经历过多轮行情检验的成熟交易机器 (more like a mature trading machine that has been tested through multiple market cycles). Compared to GMGN, which is still talking about growth elasticity, Axiom's imagination space seems to be shrinking.

Photon, BullX, and BONK: The "Stragglers" After the Tide Recedes

Compared to GMGN, which still has rebounds, and Axiom, which maintains a leading scale, the revenue curves of Photon, BullX, and BONKbot have more clearly entered a downward trend in 2026.

According to DeFiLlama data as of March 16, Photon's cumulative revenue is approximately $438 million, but its quarterly revenue has declined from $122.8 million in Q1 2025, to $32.31 million in Q2, $18.99 million in Q3, $5.29 million in Q4, and is only $4.52 million so far in Q1 2026, showing a nearly阶梯式坠落 (stepped decline) trend.

BullX's cumulative revenue is about $203 million, but it also experienced rapid contraction. Quarterly revenue dropped from $87.37 million in Q1 2025 to $14.25 million in Q2, $3.86 million in Q3, $878,000 in Q4, and is only $491,000 so far in Q1 2026.

BONKbot's decline is relatively less steep but has also clearly receded. According to DeFiLlama data, its cumulative revenue is about $93.57 million. Quarterly revenue was $12.61 million in Q1 2025, then fell to $3.40 million in Q2, $2.85 million in Q3, $1.85 million in Q4, and is $1.84 million so far in Q1 2026.

However, the BONK ecosystem itself has not simultaneously熄火 (fizzled out). As of now, BONK.fun's protocol revenue for Q1 2026 is approximately $8.51 million, already higher than the $7.06 million in Q4 2025. Of this current quarter's revenue, about $6 million comes from Bonk.Fun, and about $1.84 million comes from BonkBot.

Looking at this MEME coin battle royale, it's not hard to draw a conclusion: the MEME track is not dying out; it's just that the era of wild competition has彻底终结 (completely ended), and the reshuffling speed has far exceeded everyone's expectations.

After the tide receded, the platforms that truly remained are no longer just the fastest runners but those that have built a complete closed loop encompassing launch, trading, liquidity, and fee collection. If the next wave of MEME行情 (market trend) starts again, they are most likely the ones to benefit first.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7620497

相關問答

QWhat is Pump.fun's total cumulative revenue as of March 8th, and why is this milestone significant?

APump.fun's cumulative revenue reached $1 billion as of March 8th, making it the first platform on Solana to achieve this milestone. It solidifies its position as the most prominent revenue generator in the MEME sector.

QHow has Pump.fun's revenue distribution changed, and what happens to the fees collected?

AA significant portion of Pump.fun's fees are distributed to creators and liquidity providers (LPs). For example, in Q1 2026, out of $227 million in fees, $123 million was given to creators and LPs, and the remaining $100 million was almost entirely used for token buybacks.

QWhich platform experienced a nearly 5x quarter-over-quarter revenue growth in Q1 2026, and on which blockchain was this growth primarily driven?

AGMGN experienced a nearly 5x quarter-over-quarter revenue growth in Q1 2026, reaching $25.31 million. This growth was primarily driven by a surge in activity on the BSC (Binance Smart Chain), which now accounts for nearly three times the trading volume of its Solana chain.

QHow does the current daily revenue of Four.meme compare to its peak, and what does this indicate about the BSC MEME market?

AFour.meme's current daily revenue has fallen to the $200,000-$300,000 range, which is only a fraction of its peak daily revenue of $4.22 million in October 2025. This indicates a significant cooling off and lower activity levels in the BSC MEME market compared to its previous highs.

QWhich MEME-related platforms are described as 'laggards' with clearly declining revenue curves in 2026?

AThe platforms described as 'laggards' with clearly declining revenue curves in 2026 are Photon, BullX, and BONKbot. Their quarterly revenues have shown a consistent and significant downward trend throughout 2025 and into 2026.

你可能也喜歡

年薪百万抢电工,Meta急到自己办技校

AI竞赛正面临新的瓶颈:工地。美国正面临严重的电工、建筑工等技术工人短缺,这已成为微软、Meta、OpenAI等公司快速建设超大规模AI数据中心(如OpenAI耗资160亿美元的“星际之门”项目)的“头号障碍”。 尽管AI公司愿支付高薪(如电工年薪可达24-28万美元),远超传统行业,但熟练技工仍供不应求。麦肯锡预测,美国在2023-2030年间需额外培养13万名电工和24万名建筑工,而劳工统计局预计每年仍有8万个电工岗位空缺。这种短缺导致项目延迟,每月可能造成数百万美元的收入损失。 AI数据中心建设复杂,需应对巨大功耗(一座设施耗电堪比数十万户家庭)、复杂的配电系统以及高密度散热(需液冷技术)等挑战,因此亟需大量技术娴熟的工人。 为此,科技巨头开始亲自下场培养人才。例如,Meta投入1.15亿美元建立建筑工人培训学校,提供免费培训及生活补贴,以快速输送工人上岗。OpenAI则与建筑工会合作,提前锁定熟练劳动力。同时,企业也将招聘目光投向高中生,鼓励年轻人投身技工行业。这些举措已见成效,Z世代对技工职业的兴趣显著上升。 然而,更深层的挑战在于电力。AI数据中心用电量正以惊人速度增长,已推高部分地区的电价。此外,数据中心建设是项目制的,建设期需要成千上万的工人,但建成后仅需少量常驻人员。这意味着未来可能面临熟练工人短期过剩、并流向其他行业压低薪资的风险。如何实现劳动力与电力资源的长期平衡,仍是悬而未决的问题。

marsbit32 分鐘前

年薪百万抢电工,Meta急到自己办技校

marsbit32 分鐘前

OpenAI 不靠最贵的模型卖钱了

OpenAI近期调整了API定价策略,旗舰模型GPT-5.6 Luna降价80%,Terra降价20%,而顶级模型Sol未降价但新增了更快的“Fast”模式。此次调整的核心并非单纯的价格战,而是标志着OpenAI首次引导用户根据任务需求选择不同模型,而非一味追求最强模型。官方建议复杂任务可由Sol进行规划,再由Luna等成本更优的模型执行。 此举与Anthropic近期推出半价替代旗舰的Claude Opus 5策略相似,显示硅谷领先公司正形成默契:旗舰模型(如Sol、Fable)的角色正从直接盈利转向树立技术品牌和探索上限,而商业化走量和利润则主要由中端及性价比模型(如Luna、Opus)承担。这类似于汽车等行业“旗舰立形象,走量车型赚利润”的模式。 更深层的变化在于成本下降的驱动力。OpenAI透露,此次降价部分得益于由Sol模型自身参与优化底层生产内核,实现了效率提升与成本降低,开启了“模型优化模型”的自我加速循环。 行业竞争焦点正从“谁最聪明”的单项性能比拼,转向为企业提供基于任务重要性、出错成本、规模等因素的“模型组合”最优解,追求整体ROI。这类似于云计算按数据冷热使用不同存储的策略。 OpenAI的长期战略日益清晰:其真正目标并非依靠单一模型的高毛利,而是通过极低的调用成本构建庞大的开发者生态与调用量,形成类似操作系统或云平台的渗透率与用户粘性。当API调用成本低至可被忽略,AI将如水电般无缝嵌入所有业务流程,其发展也将从追求智能巅峰的“产品时代”,进入驱动全面自动化与效率的“基础设施时代”。

marsbit32 分鐘前

OpenAI 不靠最贵的模型卖钱了

marsbit32 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片